QUOTE(ronho @ Jul 18 2016, 10:12 PM)
And don't forget the suckish Hwang REITs & Infra Fund too....Xuzen
Fundsupermart.com v14, Happy 牛(bull!) Year
|
|
Jul 18 2016, 10:32 PM
Return to original view | Post
#101
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 20 2016, 10:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#102
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
Jul 21 2016, 11:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#103
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
QUOTE(yklooi @ Jul 21 2016, 11:01 AM) would someone with knowledge in insurance be so kind and free to open another FSM thread solely for FSM insurance? I'm so happy, I'm sooooooo happy... at long last, a website that can compare apple to apple; orange to orange insurance product. No need to ask quotation from various agents to hunt for the best deal! Yay!or should "I" refer those that posts FSM's insurance related stuffs to the insurance threads? I Xuzen |
|
|
Jul 21 2016, 12:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#104
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
QUOTE(dasecret @ Jul 21 2016, 12:01 PM) Limited insurer at the moment though. But glad to see that they are selling non-par plans which is not so commonly sold by the agents. Look forward to seeing the forumers here compare and critically assess the products although I don't need another insurance plan Limited for now, but I am very sure more insurer will jump on the bandwagon. Question - the health insurance - is it guaranteed renewal? Or general insurance style, subject to annual renewal and once you claim that's the end of it Look at FSM UT, they now cover almost the entire industry's offering except "you know who Xuzen |
|
|
Jul 21 2016, 10:19 PM
Return to original view | Post
#105
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
Manulife US equity naik!
Manulife India also naik! RHB Asian Income also naik! Looks like the market don't give a darn to Brexit! Xuzen |
|
|
Jul 22 2016, 11:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#106
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
Story telling time:
If you all recall during the early of this year, the whole market came tumbling down and what was the cause? China! Yes China and its stupid circuit-breaker fiasco! No where was safe, no geographical region was spared..... and this dump was persistent for quite some time, half a year perhaps. Now, contrast this with brexit. It created such hoo-haa, so much noise. When it actually happen, the market reacted. However if you notice it, the hoo-har and scare is soo short lived. Like the firework during fourth of july. All fanfare, entertaining but very short lived and does not impact much. What my point is, China fiasco is so long lived compared to this Brexit thingy. This means that, the world just don't give a f3cking care about a small ang-moh island anymore. This small ang-moh island has lost its significance in the larger scheme of things. Xuzen |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 22 2016, 01:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#107
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
Jul 22 2016, 01:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#108
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
Jul 22 2016, 02:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#109
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
QUOTE(aoisky @ Jul 22 2016, 12:05 AM) Just for sharing:I have noticed that the risk adjusted return of Malaysia centric fund is going downhill. Just a heads up to fellow FSM-UTF investors, perhaps it is time to reduce the weightage? As for me, for the remaining 2H-Yr2016, I will reduce by method of reversal DCA my M'sia centric UTF to about 20%. At the beginning of the year, it was at 40%. I am going to increase the Asia-Pac region (30%) and US (35%). India (15%) and M'sia (20%). Xuzen |
|
|
Jul 22 2016, 02:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#110
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
Jul 22 2016, 07:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#111
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
QUOTE(Pink Spider @ Jul 22 2016, 02:15 PM) IMHO, China centric UTFs are too volatile and unpredictable for my risk appetite. If you do recall, I wrote about it before. I got burned by it in mid 2015. I have just looked at the chart again and China centric UTFs have not recover fully from the mid 2015 dropp and mind you, it has already been one year since.With regards to Korea, why bother about it? There are no Korea centric UTF available. I will just buy into Asia-Pac ex Japan UTF and let the fund manager allocate it accordingly to his best knowledge / skill. But what do I know? I am no fund manager. At best I was just a Unit Trust Agent / CONsultant. Xuzen This post has been edited by xuzen: Jul 22 2016, 07:46 PM |
|
|
Jul 22 2016, 07:27 PM
Return to original view | Post
#112
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
QUOTE(Pink Spider @ Jul 22 2016, 02:06 PM) This brings to my mind that not all advise are applicable universally. If a reader of this forum from Singapore, then the USD/MYR factor will definitely not applicable to him or her which in this case this investor should view the US exposure as neutral.Xuzen |
|
|
Jul 23 2016, 11:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#113
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
QUOTE(aoisky @ Jul 23 2016, 10:42 AM) I am partial to RHB Asian Income In lieu of Ponzi 2.0.Also I want to make a statement about Manulife India. This is a very high risk UTF and should be part of a larger portfolio. I would never buy it as a standalone fund. Xuzen |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 23 2016, 11:21 AM
Return to original view | Post
#114
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
Jul 23 2016, 02:53 PM
Return to original view | Post
#115
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
QUOTE(prince_mk @ Jul 23 2016, 11:13 AM) TQ to your idea and sharing. I am glad you made some gain. It was all bad news since Jan 2016. Hopefully this 2H should offer some reprieve. I made some gain out of them. What is next step? Keep toppin up on Asia Pac market ? I exited India last year. Yes, I will top up on Asia-Pac ex Japan exposure. On a separate note, I want to highlight an observation. Take a look at two distinct country centric UTF; namely CIMB Greater China (0.96) and Manulife India (0.92). The number inside the brackets are the Sharpe Ratio as taken from FSM website (Fund Selector function). Now, take a look at UTF RHB China-India fund (1.06). Two separate individual country has lower sharpe ratio individually but when combined in a portfolio, the sharpe ratio get ramp up by 15 bps. From Morningstar, the correlation-coefficient of these two country stock market is very low, that is, at 0.28. So, the point here I want to make is, low correlation-coefficient which is the quantitative measurement of diversification will improve the risk-adjusted return of portfolio. Xuzen P/S Some explanation of academic terms: Risk is a concept or idea. Volatility is the observable outcome of risk and Standard Deviation is the qualitative measurement of volatility. Similarly diversification is a concept or idea. Covariance is the observable outcome of diversity and Correlation-Coefficient is the qualitative measurement of diversification. In simple layman term, it is like high and low. It is a perception, how high? How low? Length is the observable outcome. And meter is the qualitative measurement of length. Let's say Mt Everest is higher than Mt Kinabalu. How high you may ask. Mt Everest is 13,000 meters whereas Mt Kinabalu is 10.000 meters. So we can say Mt Everest is 3,000 meters lengthier than Mt Kinabalu. This post has been edited by xuzen: Jul 23 2016, 03:35 PM |
|
|
Jul 24 2016, 01:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#116
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
Jul 25 2016, 12:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#117
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
Jul 25 2016, 08:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#118
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
|
|
|
Jul 25 2016, 11:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#119
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
QUOTE(dasecret @ Jul 25 2016, 08:58 PM) But when equity rally, RHB Asian income fund won't run as fast. Any plan to switch to an asia PAC eq fund? My Ponzi 1.0's IRR exceeded Asian income fund jor My style has always been to seek stability rather than to chase return.Ponzi 1.0, that is Affin-Hwang Asia Ex Japan fund is exposed to Asia small cap equities. When she rebounds, sure geng wan like what is happening now. When vice-versa happens, also very geng! I choose the middle way. Bear in mind, in my portfolio I have Eastspring investment small cap fund and also Manulife India equity fund, that is , both are very high risk, just like Ponzi 1.0. I let them do the job equivalent to Ponzi 1.0. I think lately most of the portfolios are very black. Give yourself a pat on the back, sister, for staying invested even during the doldrums period from Jan 2016 to Jun 2016. Xuzen This post has been edited by xuzen: Jul 25 2016, 11:43 PM |
|
|
Jul 25 2016, 11:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#120
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,436 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0808sec
0.57
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 12:23 PM |