Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

6 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Learn from costly mistakes of Sunway BRT, says Penang Institute News

views
     
waja2000
post Mar 2 2016, 10:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(starcian @ Mar 2 2016, 08:52 PM)
So that caused high fare due to BRT cost RM117million/km
Let's see how much the fare going to be for KVMRT that cost RM450million/km
Good luck
*
QUOTE(JimbeamofNRT @ Mar 2 2016, 09:07 PM)
lol. to KLshould cost more than RM 10 per journey then
*
can't compare Bus with rail service.
if follow recently LRT fare increasing news, RapidKL already said MRT will follow rate as LRT base on distant.
if 51KM, end-to end expected around RM6-7. but most people will take half way means to KL mostly, cost around RM3-4
waja2000
post Mar 2 2016, 10:27 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
137 posts

Joined: Oct 2006
QUOTE(hoimangkuk @ Mar 2 2016, 06:24 PM)
user posted image
*
this building is built after Monorail is complate, just like Kerinchi Station people already know & accept it
LaVilla.
post Mar 2 2016, 10:37 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
75 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
QUOTE(JimbeamofNRT @ Mar 2 2016, 10:22 PM)
PH.  smile.gif
*
haha is a great place tongue.gif I love to handout at Mr Roti Canai there haha
psycho1
post Mar 2 2016, 10:41 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
37 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


All the while I thought the BRT project was funded by Sunway group themselves. Really fucuk, why the heck federal governement spend so much for the fucuk BRT for the Sunway group. The whole design is meant for the convenient of Sunway group and to put money into their pocket.
JimbeamofNRT
post Mar 2 2016, 10:50 PM

the Original Lanji@_ Chicken Rice Shop Since 2002
******
Senior Member
1,902 posts

Joined: Sep 2012

QUOTE(psycho1 @ Mar 2 2016, 10:41 PM)
All the while I thought the BRT project was funded by Sunway group themselves. Really fucuk, why the heck federal governement spend so much for the fucuk BRT for the Sunway group. The whole design is meant for the convenient of Sunway group and to put money into their pocket.
*
best kan?


psycho1
post Mar 2 2016, 11:10 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
37 posts

Joined: Jan 2009


QUOTE(JimbeamofNRT @ Mar 2 2016, 10:50 PM)
best kan?
*
634M for this fucuk project, just so Jeffrey Cheah can charge more tuition fees to his students and his new property development.
spacelion
post Mar 2 2016, 11:20 PM

Ada Liu
******
Senior Member
1,689 posts

Joined: Mar 2009
From: Probation?
eh no i work near USj and i've never seen bus on this BRT before. didn't know its open already.
hoimangkuk
post Mar 3 2016, 12:00 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
214 posts

Joined: Jul 2006
From: from the country that only know complaining


QUOTE(waja2000 @ Mar 2 2016, 10:27 PM)
this building is built after Monorail is complate, just like Kerinchi Station people already know & accept it
*
but its still a good idea to renovate building and make a station in it...
maraippo
post Mar 3 2016, 12:08 AM

~PoPoPoPoPo~
******
Senior Member
1,165 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Kami's Palace


QUOTE(Zi-Tech @ Mar 2 2016, 10:16 PM)
LRT extension price already published in new fare on LRT websites... you may find all station fare there... and it is not so high... from my house (putra heights) to KLCC around RM5.60 which is if not mistaken around 22-24 station....(13 extension + maybe 10 station from kelana jaya to klcc... not remember)

and also you may find the new fare calculation sometimes very odd... for example,monorel kl sentral to imbi will be 3.2, but to bukit bintang is 2.50... this is due to base fare(which is fixed) and kilometer bracket like 1-5km is rm0.125/km 5.1-10km is rm0.112/km...only know about this at ktm station...this is applied to all rail system except klia express

for BRT, only using when free riding only...
*
Nice. If its like that, its dirt cheap. 5.60 can avoid jam, toll, parking and spend time in coach doing something else
JimbeamofNRT
post Mar 3 2016, 09:03 AM

the Original Lanji@_ Chicken Rice Shop Since 2002
******
Senior Member
1,902 posts

Joined: Sep 2012

QUOTE(psycho1 @ Mar 2 2016, 11:10 PM)
634M for this fucuk project, just so Jeffrey Cheah can charge more tuition fees to his students and his new property development.
*
He is, after all, a businessman.

haih.

if he didn't do it. somebody else will do it.

I still remember Sunway's so called mini monorail, IIRC the service was discontinued in early 2000s

http://www.funnymalaysia.net/11-facts-abou...-petaling-jaya/

user posted image

user posted image
Zi-Tech
post Mar 4 2016, 12:45 AM

Eh, pangkat sudah tukar ka
*****
Senior Member
774 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: Shah Alam, Selangor/ Gambang, Kuantan, Pahang



QUOTE(JimbeamofNRT @ Mar 2 2016, 10:21 PM)
http://www.myrapid.com.my/deals/promotions...norail-services

Rm 4.80 bro from PH to KLCC via KJ Line per journey . correct me if I am wrong.

single rider ok lah.
*
yup... 4.80... maybe sebelum ni salah line tengok... hahaha maklumlah table dia besar sangat... nak zoom satu2...hehehe okla return only less than rm10 compare to use car, fuel, toll, parking... more than rm50...
kadiology
post Mar 4 2016, 02:42 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
114 posts

Joined: Feb 2005


I think there are no mistakes for this project except for the crazy high fare. I hope they proceed with BRT klang - KL soon.
differ
post Mar 4 2016, 03:18 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
404 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
Might as well take Uber.
darth5zaft
post Mar 4 2016, 06:27 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
901 posts

Joined: Feb 2012


A highly political statements disguised as an analytical reports for the consumption of gullible idiots.

1)We can go see the details and rendering of klang BRT from SPAD website, we can also see their overall plan in KVURDP

2) The klang BRT is at grade and aren't elevated stations, a fair report who designed as a intellectual piece would never "accidentally" miss that. What kind of idiots compared and try to implied similarly in cost and fares structure for 2 completely different system.

3)The LRT station connection to the BRT system which would be it main feeders aren't open yet. How can it be a failure when it hasn't been finished yet? Shouldn't they wait till the line open this year to make such an assessment and claims?

4) shouldn't a propaganda pieces be written and paid for by the party itself than putting it under the government where tax payers money and land is used to paid for stuff like this?

It's good to mention prasarana debts, should Also mention of 27 billions commitments for the penang lrt project that is sign few months before such an action be illegal under federal law which would limit direct nego contact to under 300 millions?

ganz
post Mar 4 2016, 06:50 AM

Livin' Ain't No Crime
******
Senior Member
1,139 posts

Joined: Mar 2005



QUOTE(psycho1 @ Mar 2 2016, 10:41 PM)
All the while I thought the BRT project was funded by Sunway group themselves. Really fucuk, why the heck federal governement spend so much for the fucuk BRT for the Sunway group. The whole design is meant for the convenient of Sunway group and to put money into their pocket.
*
Not u alone.. Most of Malaysian think the same.. sad.gif

SUSVape [On]
post Mar 4 2016, 06:57 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,098 posts

Joined: Nov 2015
QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Mar 4 2016, 06:27 AM)
A highly political statements disguised as an analytical reports for the consumption of gullible idiots.

1)We can go see the details and rendering of klang BRT from SPAD website, we can also see their overall plan in KVURDP

2) The klang BRT is at grade and aren't elevated stations, a fair report who designed as a intellectual piece would never "accidentally" miss that. What kind of idiots compared and try to implied similarly in cost and fares structure for 2 completely different system.

3)The LRT station connection to the BRT system which would be it main feeders aren't open yet. How can it be a failure when it hasn't been finished yet? Shouldn't they wait till the line open this year to make such an assessment and claims?

4) shouldn't a propaganda pieces be written and paid for by the party itself than putting it under the government where tax payers money and land is used to paid for stuff like this?

It's good to mention prasarana debts, should Also  mention of 27 billions commitments for the penang lrt project that is sign few months before such an action be illegal under federal law which would limit direct nego contact to under 300 millions?
*
Confirn written by a pas member
FatalExe
post Mar 4 2016, 07:27 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
695 posts

Joined: Jan 2008


QUOTE(darth5zaft @ Mar 4 2016, 06:27 AM)
A highly political statements disguised as an analytical reports for the consumption of gullible idiots.

1)We can go see the details and rendering of klang BRT from SPAD website, we can also see their overall plan in KVURDP

2) The klang BRT is at grade and aren't elevated stations, a fair report who designed as a intellectual piece would never "accidentally" miss that. What kind of idiots compared and try to implied similarly in cost and fares structure for 2 completely different system.

3)The LRT station connection to the BRT system which would be it main feeders aren't open yet. How can it be a failure when it hasn't been finished yet? Shouldn't they wait till the line open this year to make such an assessment and claims?

4) shouldn't a propaganda pieces be written and paid for by the party itself than putting it under the government where tax payers money and land is used to paid for stuff like this?

It's good to mention prasarana debts, should Also  mention of 27 billions commitments for the penang lrt project that is sign few months before such an action be illegal under federal law which would limit direct nego contact to under 300 millions?
*
Did u download and read the full 26 page report? The report is written by a non partisan member and is all about BRT systems, has nothing to do with DAP's songlap projects

By the way, the report mentions Lowyat forum as well in its opening pages haha

This post has been edited by FatalExe: Mar 4 2016, 07:34 AM
SUSVape [On]
post Mar 4 2016, 07:36 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,098 posts

Joined: Nov 2015
QUOTE(Zi-Tech @ Mar 4 2016, 12:45 AM)
yup... 4.80... maybe sebelum ni salah line tengok... hahaha maklumlah table dia besar sangat... nak zoom satu2...hehehe okla return only less than rm10 compare to use car, fuel, toll, parking... more than rm50...
*
Rm50?

You drive a ferrari?
JimbeamofNRT
post Mar 4 2016, 10:39 AM

the Original Lanji@_ Chicken Rice Shop Since 2002
******
Senior Member
1,902 posts

Joined: Sep 2012

QUOTE(Zi-Tech @ Mar 4 2016, 12:45 AM)
yup... 4.80... maybe sebelum ni salah line tengok... hahaha maklumlah table dia besar sangat... nak zoom satu2...hehehe okla return only less than rm10 compare to use car, fuel, toll, parking... more than rm50...
*
if single person ok lah can save a bit

but bring the whole family, I think I better drive my barge
JimbeamofNRT
post Mar 4 2016, 10:40 AM

the Original Lanji@_ Chicken Rice Shop Since 2002
******
Senior Member
1,902 posts

Joined: Sep 2012

QUOTE(Vape On @ Mar 4 2016, 07:36 AM)
Rm50?

You drive a ferrari?
*
sounds like RX-7. rotary power!

6 Pages « < 3 4 5 6 >
Bump Topic Add ReplyOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0199sec    0.39    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 04:01 PM