Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
8 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V20

views
     
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 23 2016, 08:34 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Mar 23 2016, 02:36 PM)
gonna equip the panzer with what? 105mm smoothbore cannon and IR/Thermal scope?  sweat.gif

but then again, Israel quite successful with their upgraded Shermans during Arab-Israel War..
*
Lucky if can retrofit Panzer III turret with anything, considering they were originally were armed with tiny 50mm gun only.
Considering the Arab-Israel wars are already 60 years ago, an age before ATGMs, irrelevant remains irrelevant. laugh.gif
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 23 2016, 09:25 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Mar 23 2016, 09:08 PM)
Why unstable? There is after all Stryker MGS... can be used as assault gun than pure IFV killer. Or urban ambush against tank side armour, 105mm would have much higher chance of scoring a kill.

edit: Oh its still unknown what armament will be mounted...
*
The concept itself is ridiculously stupid. I wish everyone drop it already. tongue.gif
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 24 2016, 07:59 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(Gregyong @ Mar 24 2016, 07:31 AM)
you mean even though the turret can turn 360, firing at the wrong angle can tip it? tongue.gif
*
No, I mean the idea of recommissioning 60-year old tanks to active service. Especially if the separatists have even more tanks and armored vehicles than some developing countries.

user posted image


This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Mar 24 2016, 08:02 AM
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 24 2016, 04:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(Fat & Fluffy @ Mar 24 2016, 10:07 AM)
user posted image
*
Due respect to the Singapore military, but when I see how a skinny dude with glasses is responsible for my life and security, it doesn't give me that much confidence terrorists aren't going to give it a go. laugh.gif
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 24 2016, 05:01 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(Fat & Fluffy @ Mar 24 2016, 04:56 PM)
I guess it is better than a obese 300 pounder that can barely carry his own weight...

Well, these sentries arent the fittest... but no doubt they are operational ready soldiers, trusted and tested to be able to do their job...
*
user posted image
laugh.gif

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Mar 24 2016, 05:02 PM
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 25 2016, 04:07 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Mar 25 2016, 03:03 PM)
That ship in your original quote is more or less a frigate... just need bolt on CIWS and SSMs. I wouldn't be surprised if they are "fitted for, but not with"... aka what the Littoral Combat Ship was supposed to be like
*
user posted image

user posted image
The ship you are referring to is actually a downgraded Type 053H2G 'Jiangwei I'-class frigate. The PLAN retired the class, stripped most of their military weapons (although they retained the twin turreted 37mm guns) and gave 3 of those ships to the coast guard.
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 29 2016, 09:20 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(Fat & Fluffy @ Mar 29 2016, 10:55 AM)
why need a trailer... cant the vehicle move by itself? unless of course not fully assembled..  i believe fuel consumption for that trailer would be higher...
*
confused.gif

user posted image
rclxms.gif

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Mar 29 2016, 09:48 PM
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 29 2016, 11:58 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(caksz @ Mar 29 2016, 10:57 PM)
kinda normal , better flatbed then put unnecessary stress.
*
That's my point. Everyone does it. Using civilian flatbeds for trucking around armored vehicles for transit are pretty much SOP. It saves on wear and tear, plus heavy armored vehicles travelling on their own can damage roads pretty bad. Strange someone with military experience finds this practice peculiar. brows.gif

user posted image
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 30 2016, 10:26 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Mar 29 2016, 10:34 AM)
nice... can't see the mast mount tho.
*
Probably contains basic recon gear like high-def TV cams, FLIR and whatnot.
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 30 2016, 11:02 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Mar 30 2016, 10:45 AM)
Is that protrusion on the rear ground based radar? What I wanted to see was the approx height retracted of the mast mount and whether its telescopic or folding.
*
Seeing that there's no visible folding mast, i'd guess that the AV8 uses a telescoping mast. As to the height of the mast, i'd say it would be at least as long as the height of the AV8 hull body where it is contained? If the height of the hull is around 3 meters, that would probably mean the mast is around that length? If so, a reasonable assumption would be that the mast could, at least, be extended to 7 meters off the ground? (3 meters mast+ 3 meters hull+ 1meters wheels)

To me that sounds logical enough and probably would be the best answer we have at this time. hmm.gif
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 30 2016, 11:22 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Mar 30 2016, 11:02 AM)
CV90 with Vingtaqs II, most of the system seen is featured on a telescopic mast

user posted image
*
I'd prefer a lighter, less conspicous AFV as a recon vehicle though, probably something wheeled. Recon missions have different parameters than combat missions. You don't need that much firepower and armor on recon. Going for stealth and mobility is a better option.

user posted image
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 30 2016, 11:56 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(DDG_Ross @ Mar 30 2016, 11:49 AM)
in the era of "multi-roling everything" nowadays vehicles like these is getting less favour, and recon task nowadays is most likely done by covert ops special forces teams
*
Probably ok in nowaday's lower-intensity wars, but probably not so suited in a fast-moving conventional war.
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 30 2016, 12:15 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Mar 30 2016, 12:06 PM)
Nowadays all it takes is a 2 man scout team with a radio to report movement, call down fires etc. Was reading a book about Afghanistan, it seems the US SOF even can tap and trace Taliban radio and send text/data with a small laptop sized unit, all encrypted and via satellite.
*
Again, in low-intensity wars. A house compound with 20 Taliban dudes would certainly be easily scouted by small SOF teams with laptops and stuff. SOF teams nowadays get it easy because the size and capability of their main enemy (mostly rural insurgents and third world armies & militias) is far, far inferior compared to them.

How about against a peer or near-peer enemy with good electronic security and capable surveillance equipment? An enemy armed UAV would probably find and smoke any SOF teams less than 30 minutes after they landed by submarine. laugh.gif

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Mar 30 2016, 12:20 PM
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 31 2016, 12:09 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(Fat & Fluffy @ Mar 31 2016, 09:13 AM)
Indonesia awaits Philippines' green-light to free abducted sailors
*
There is definitely no way this won't end badly. laugh.gif
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 31 2016, 01:15 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(IReallyNeed Answers @ Mar 31 2016, 12:49 PM)
did i just heard KM SIAKAP?

our version of McBoaty? haha
*
What's so funny about naming boats after sea life? It's pretty common.

You'd think that the US Navy Seawolf submarines was named after some type of badass sea-going wolf is it? Here's bursting your bubble. From Wiki:
QUOTE
USS Seawolf (SSN-21), the lead ship of her class, is the fourth submarine of the United States Navy named for the seawolf, a solitary fish with strong, prominent teeth and projecting tusks that give it a savage look.
In truth the Seawolf submarines were named after this beauty:

user posted image

laugh.gif

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Mar 31 2016, 01:17 PM
MilitaryMadness
post Mar 31 2016, 02:24 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(IReallyNeed Answers @ Mar 31 2016, 02:21 PM)
haha, no disrespect la, but i really find that naming it as KM Siakap kinda funny.

not because it's some ugly looking stupid fish or what, just that it's something that i will more often than not have it for dinner, but now tertiba become the name of the ship haha

i didnt say seawolf sound nicer pun, tak kesah pun if seawolf ke, subwolfer ke, itu dia orang punya pasal la.

but im just assuming somewhere around us, there's a KM Todak! gansa sial

user posted image
*
Got KM Marlin for APMM. So no biggie there. laugh.gif

user posted image
QUOTE
Vessel History

KM MARLIN is a training ship that had been presented by The Nippon Foundation, Japan to the Malaysian Maritime Enforcement Agency. Ship was launched on 30 January 2006 and was to be completed in March 2006. A total of 10 members of the MMEA was commissioned to bring back the ship to Malaysia. Ships sailed from Naha, Japan on 4 April 2006 and arrived in Port Klang 14 Apri 2006. Naming ceremony and reception were held at KM MARLIN National Hydrographic Centre on 1 June 2006 with completion by Datin Rosmah Mansor, wife, daughter of the Deputy Prime Minister. KM MARLIN placed under the supervision of the MMEA Training center based in Kuantan, Pahang.


MilitaryMadness
post Mar 31 2016, 03:54 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


Anybody for the idea of fighting pirates and kidnappers with disguised armed ships as bait? (similar to the WW2 concept of 'Q' Ships).

"Nothing to see here, just a harmless vulnerable merchant ship sailing very close to known pirate attack areas....hey are those people on the boat armed with AKs heading for us?"

Solution: open the container side panel containing a twin-barrel 20mm autocannon mount and blast away.

Any pirate in the area wishing to attack any merchant ships will have to think twice afterwards and wonder if their targets will shoot back at them.

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Mar 31 2016, 04:12 PM
MilitaryMadness
post Apr 1 2016, 12:10 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


Night vision and FLIR should be on board every APMM patrol boat. That's as basic as security surveillance equipment goes. I'm surprised that doesn't come as standard. hmm.gif
MilitaryMadness
post Apr 1 2016, 07:36 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Apr 1 2016, 12:41 AM)
still sounds better than USS Tuna, USS Sardine, USS Mackerel whistling.gif
*
The problem is there has indeed existed ships (submarines to be exact) named USS Tuna and USS Mackerel. So, as I said, totally no biggie there. laugh.gif

user posted image
Badge of USS Tuna

user posted image
Badge of USS Mackerel

But on the restructuring of the US Navy naming conventions, we may never get to see such colorful names again. Now submarines are boringly named after major cities (USS Los Angels) or dead presidents (USS Jimmy Carter). doh.gif

This post has been edited by MilitaryMadness: Apr 1 2016, 07:55 AM
MilitaryMadness
post Apr 2 2016, 11:35 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,302 posts

Joined: Oct 2010
From: Over your shoulder


QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Apr 2 2016, 08:29 PM)
impossibru... GLA no aircraft or heli punya brows.gif
*
Manned aircraft are probably beyond their capabilities. Small UAVs with IEDs on suicide missions though, are quite possible IMHO. IS are quite competent in their use of UAVs for battlefield surveillance. Using them for direct attack are probably a natural progression.

8 Pages « < 2 3 4 5 6 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0780sec    0.22    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 04:44 AM