Something like this, perhaps? charger
Sony Xperia X-series - Official Thread V1, Xperia XZ Announced! Triple Sensing Tech
|
|
 Nov 9 2016, 10:11 AM
|
 
Senior Member
1,061 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Don't know.   
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Nov 9 2016, 01:27 PM
|
Junior Member
420 posts Joined: May 2011 
|
QUOTE(raymondtong94 @ Nov 9 2016, 09:59 AM) haven't seen one other than UCH-12. The UCH-12 is too expensive.. haha it also seems to be lacking in 3rd party support.  QUOTE(BlitzAce @ Nov 9 2016, 10:11 AM) Hm.. Seems okay wo.. Should be RM50-60 if sold here. Gonna keep an eye out for more reputable brand like Belkin.. haha |
|
|
Nov 9 2016, 01:35 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,061 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Don't know.
|
I don't think there's any of the big brands that makes PE chargers, been looking around for a while now, actually.
|
|
|
Nov 9 2016, 01:46 PM
|
|
Junior Member
420 posts Joined: May 2011
|
QUOTE(BlitzAce @ Nov 9 2016, 01:35 PM) I don't think there's any of the big brands that makes PE chargers, been looking around for a while now, actually. Aww.. That's just sad..Oh btw, XA Ultra retail price just dropped RM200..  I just bought it a week ago.. |
|
|
Nov 9 2016, 03:21 PM
|
Junior Member
387 posts Joined: Jun 2011 From: Tip of Mainland Asia
|
Sony doesn't use Qualcomm Quick Charge tech? Their fast charging is proprietary?
|
|
|
Nov 9 2016, 03:34 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#426
|
Senior Member
11,096 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Your kokoro
|
QUOTE(LightningChan @ Nov 9 2016, 01:27 PM) The UCH-12 is too expensive.. haha QUOTE(LightningChan @ Nov 9 2016, 01:46 PM) Aww.. That's just sad.. If you become my girlfriend, i will get you one for free. Oh btw, XA Ultra retail price just dropped RM200.. I just bought it a week ago..  Jokes aside, yes, understandable for those whom bought it recently. Coz i faced this situation before. Money went down to the drain. QUOTE(powerangah @ Nov 9 2016, 03:21 PM) Sony doesn't use Qualcomm Quick Charge tech? Their fast charging is proprietary? No. Because sony uses different chipset for their phones, each chipset has their own fast charging technology. If Qualcomm, use QC. If Mediatek, use Pump Express.This post has been edited by raymondtong94: Nov 9 2016, 03:35 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 9 2016, 03:51 PM
|
|
Junior Member
420 posts Joined: May 2011
|
QUOTE(raymondtong94 @ Nov 9 2016, 03:34 PM) If you become my girlfriend, i will get you one for free. Haha.. Jokes aside, yes, understandable for those whom bought it recently. Coz i faced this situation before. Money went down to the drain. But then again, RM1699 with 1 year extended warranty and an overly priced thin rubber casing vs RM1499 with nothing. I think my deal was better la..  Gonna compile and post some test shots with the XA Ultra rear and front camera soon  |
|
|
Nov 9 2016, 03:51 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,061 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Don't know.
|
Someone should bring in those PE chargers and sell em here
 |
|
|
Nov 9 2016, 04:34 PM
|
|
Junior Member
420 posts Joined: May 2011
|
QUOTE(BlitzAce @ Nov 9 2016, 03:51 PM) Someone should bring in those PE chargers and sell em here That is actually a good idea.. Many phones uses Mediatek SoCs nowadays.. HTC, Sony, Xiao Mi, Oppo are the main phones I see on the list.  |
|
|
Nov 9 2016, 05:14 PM
|
|
Junior Member
387 posts Joined: Jun 2011 From: Tip of Mainland Asia
|
QUOTE(raymondtong94 @ Nov 9 2016, 03:34 PM) If you become my girlfriend, i will get you one for free. Samsung uses Exynos but still compatible with qcJokes aside, yes, understandable for those whom bought it recently. Coz i faced this situation before. Money went down to the drain. No. Because sony uses different chipset for their phones, each chipset has their own fast charging technology. If Qualcomm, use QC. If Mediatek, use Pump Express. |
|
|
Nov 9 2016, 05:24 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#431
|
|
Senior Member
11,096 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Your kokoro
|
QUOTE(powerangah @ Nov 9 2016, 05:14 PM) Samsung uses Exynos but still compatible with qc Because their Exynos chipset is based on Qualcomm's quick charging technology, so it's compatible vice versa. |
|
|
Nov 9 2016, 06:44 PM
|
|
Junior Member
387 posts Joined: Jun 2011 From: Tip of Mainland Asia
|
QUOTE(raymondtong94 @ Nov 9 2016, 05:24 PM) Because their Exynos chipset is based on Qualcomm's quick charging technology, so it's compatible vice versa. Ahh that makes sense |
|
|
Nov 9 2016, 07:05 PM
|
|
Junior Member
420 posts Joined: May 2011
|
As a photographer of sorts, I had to do a simple review on the XA Ultra's camera.
So for a few random shots  » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Macro shots (With NEX-3N shots to show what I am focusing on)  » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Selfie » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Overall, pretty disappointed with the camera. The resolution is there but it takes really near perfect condition to get a nice shot. Front camera however, is really nice. Pros : - Overall good color reproduction - Fair speed at taking pictures - Large screen so its easy to spot for details - Good resolution - Front camera flash and OIS helps alot - Comfortable shutter button despite being thin Cons : - Poor autofocus speed - Phase detection not fast enough in some cases - Poor macro focusing(iPhone 5 does better) - Rear camera no OIS. Pressing the shutter button fast may shake the photo - Stock camera app settings and control are quite limited even on manual mode - No custom white balance - Auto mode sucks as auto white balance is not accurate most of the time indoors - Single LED flash not powerful enough for further subjects in the dark Thanks for reading  |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 9 2016, 07:29 PM
|
|
Senior Member
11,096 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Your kokoro
|
QUOTE(LightningChan @ Nov 9 2016, 07:05 PM) » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Anyway, just joking. Nice review BTW. No doubt a photographer's sight. I have a A6000 but mostly serves as my leisure camera. And reading this review made me wanna write a camera review for my Xperia XZ. |
|
|
Nov 9 2016, 07:43 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#435
|
|
Junior Member
420 posts Joined: May 2011
|
QUOTE(raymondtong94 @ Nov 9 2016, 07:29 PM) Oh well, i believe your PM inbox gonna flooded with people to ask for your number, and i might be the first. A6000!!! My dream camera! Anyway, just joking. Nice review BTW. No doubt a photographer's sight. I have a A6000 but mostly serves as my leisure camera. And reading this review made me wanna write a camera review for my Xperia XZ. I'm curious though on XZ's triple sensor. |
|
|
Nov 10 2016, 10:21 AM
|
Senior Member
978 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: PJ
|
QUOTE(LightningChan @ Nov 9 2016, 07:05 PM) Pros : I have the Xperia X, not sure whether the focusing distance is the same. - Overall good color reproduction - Fair speed at taking pictures - Large screen so its easy to spot for details - Good resolution - Front camera flash and OIS helps alot - Comfortable shutter button despite being thin Cons : - Poor autofocus speed - Phase detection not fast enough in some cases - Poor macro focusing(iPhone 5 does better) - Rear camera no OIS. Pressing the shutter button fast may shake the photo - Stock camera app settings and control are quite limited even on manual mode - No custom white balance - Auto mode sucks as auto white balance is not accurate most of the time indoors - Single LED flash not powerful enough for further subjects in the dark Last week I tried to use the rear camera to snap a high res photo of a printed 3/4R picture, it just won't focus when I get too near to the photo, was trying to get it as close as possible to get better resolution. So what I did was to pull back, and then just zoom in, make sure the zoom is less than 2X. Since the X camera have 24 MP which is too much, I guess don't mind sacrificing a bit. It is not really the same with macro focus, but guess it is a workaround. |
|
|
Nov 10 2016, 04:07 PM
|
|
Junior Member
420 posts Joined: May 2011
|
QUOTE(kiwlm @ Nov 10 2016, 10:21 AM) I have the Xperia X, not sure whether the focusing distance is the same. Yup. Basically if your focus distance is lesser than the minimum focusing distance the lens won't focus. Stepping away and zooming in to focus is one way to do it. You can also snap the picture at your widest angle and then crop it later. Quality should still be okay if you don't crop too much since its a 20mp+ camera. Safer than zooming because photos tend to be blurry from handshake.Last week I tried to use the rear camera to snap a high res photo of a printed 3/4R picture, it just won't focus when I get too near to the photo, was trying to get it as close as possible to get better resolution. So what I did was to pull back, and then just zoom in, make sure the zoom is less than 2X. Since the X camera have 24 MP which is too much, I guess don't mind sacrificing a bit. It is not really the same with macro focus, but guess it is a workaround. If only there are manual focusing option. That way can maximize the use of the camera's focusing distance. Still, very disapointed with the camera la.. haha This post has been edited by LightningChan: Nov 10 2016, 04:08 PM |
|
|
Nov 10 2016, 05:22 PM
|
|
Senior Member
11,096 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Your kokoro
|
QUOTE(LightningChan @ Nov 10 2016, 04:07 PM) Yup. Basically if your focus distance is lesser than the minimum focusing distance the lens won't focus. Stepping away and zooming in to focus is one way to do it. You can also snap the picture at your widest angle and then crop it later. Quality should still be okay if you don't crop too much since its a 20mp+ camera. Safer than zooming because photos tend to be blurry from handshake. This is why you should get the XZ, periodically. If only there are manual focusing option. That way can maximize the use of the camera's focusing distance. Still, very disapointed with the camera la.. haha Coz XZ features full manual control (finally, lol). |
|
|
Nov 10 2016, 06:10 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#439
|
|
Junior Member
420 posts Joined: May 2011
|
QUOTE(raymondtong94 @ Nov 10 2016, 05:22 PM) This is why you should get the XZ, periodically. But it's so pricey and bezel so thick.. XDCoz XZ features full manual control (finally, lol). I think there's 3rd party camera apps that allow manual focus as well.. Haha. |
|
|
Nov 10 2016, 06:17 PM
Show posts by this member only | IPv6 | Post
#440
|
|
Senior Member
11,096 posts Joined: Feb 2011 From: Your kokoro
|
QUOTE(LightningChan @ Nov 10 2016, 06:10 PM) But it's so pricey and bezel so thick.. XD XA Ultra bezels thicker leh... I think there's 3rd party camera apps that allow manual focus as well.. Haha. Just to let you know only, Camera FV if i remember correctly...  |
| Change to: |  0.0306sec
 1.28
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 02:24 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.