http://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/ma...-size-evolution

So women get these features because men choose them for aesthetics, just like how some dog breeder force breed dogs with cute but weak/useless features.
After many generation of selective partnership, bigger breasts and rounder buttocks become more common among female offspring, but there are no practical or scientific functions for these features, other than pleasing men.


Bigger breasts dont produce more milk, already proven false.

http://www.babycenter.com/404_is-it-true-t...ilk_10310185.bc

Bigger hips for easy child birth is also not true.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/...50313094557.htm

Too many myths already.

This post has been edited by StephMujan: Dec 19 2015, 03:47 PM

You tak suke, you pigi cari achik.

you mean ancient people got small to no boob and flat butt? which universe they do research?

so.. care to share your measurements steph?

then mengikut TS, those batang besar only just for show, no practical usage.

Bodoh.. without big breast and round buttocks, how to attract billionaire to kawin them...

To me big boobs and butt = fat people. If u are thin and have those, = cosmetic job. Sorry i'm no fan of Barbie Girl.

I dont really measure them?
I only know my weight due to work requirement.
I dont think being too self conscious is good, lazy to keep track.

Actually, its different for males, longer and bigger penises may have a competitive function.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/20...a-health-weird/

There are skinny women big large breasts and buttocks, its just genetic.
Due to selective breeding.

The way u talk is like farm people. Its not like there are any benefits in having big boobs and butts. The human physical balance also lost. If u farm people for meat, that makes a lot of sense.

Who says for aesthetics only?
Bigger breast = more milk
Bigger hips = better for child bearing

Plop2 weiii

No drillz fail tered

Imagine kim kardashian now.... dammm

so does vegeterians

big nenen,.. more milk,.. who said no evolutionary use ??

whoever wrote that article must be airport with no ass
using 'scientific' articles to justify their buthurtness

Its not my choice to make, its both male and female preference.
Humans do selectively breed with desirable partners, not randomly, so yes we are farming each other.
But the problem is we dont choose rationally, just like some dog breeds are created for cuteness but very weak and get sick easily.

Bigger breasts dont produce more milk, already proven false.

http://www.babycenter.com/404_is-it-true-t...ilk_10310185.bc

Bigger hips for easy child birth is also not true.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/...50313094557.htm

Too many myths already.

Actually, vegetarian diet is good for some people, but not all.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19562864

Thin anorexia wimminz will hurt my balls, my hips and my thigh when sexing..

Not a pleasant feeling, its like fucuking a hard plywood with the edges constantly hitting your balls.

Sorry, all those thin as fucuk wimmiz are banned from my list..kalau they nekid pun I dunwan.

See my link below, already proven false for a long time.

http://www.babycenter.com/404_is-it-true-t...ilk_10310185.bc


I dont think the researchers and professors are paid to make false claims.
They would be fired by their employers.

Are you single? Ever dated?
I'm sure some men prefer them.

Married with one son..

Yeah ive dated a few before.

Kesian those guys with thin girls..wonder if they tried sexing with busty and bootylicious girl before..

Sudah cuba nak lagi hahaha.

Then you have no reason to complain, unless you are dating someone in secret?

Just sharing my past experience with forever alone guys here..

Because practical experience is more important than just aesthetic look of an anorexic girls who look nice in clothes but delivers a painful sexual intercourse.

Personally that alone can be considered as an important factor to have a girl with FUNCTIONAL features of big boobs and big booty

Want to have a good sex life, hourglass girls will keep you happy for a LONG LONG TIME.

This post has been edited by NUR_VER.3: Dec 19 2015, 02:34 PM

How skinny have you dated until can feel the bone? As girls, even a really skinny girl will have a softer body compared to men, unless you have dated girls with anorexia?
I'm unsure if you are telling the truth or just guessing?

LoL its either you are a guy who never dated skinny girls or u are a girl..

Any guys who dated skinny and curvy girls will know which one gives better experience and comfort. Nothing to it really just a simple logic of having that extra layer of fat to absorb the impact.

So you are guessing?
My sister is very skinny, so are some of my friends, I can never feel their "bones" when we hug.
The only time I can feel the bone is when I hug my boyfriend or male friends.

By that logic, animals only has sex when they want to breed, with the exceptions of conobos apes afaik.

Human's shouldn't have sex unless they want to breed?

Lol, there are some skinny girl with big boobs.

Lol, dont u know. Many of researchers is pay by some company to make bogus claim like eating more vitamin is important, drink milk can strengthen bone, u need protein shake to build muscle and the list is go on

Hug is not equal to sex

U got a lot to learn, girl..

But i aint got the time to teach ya all that, gotta go play with my son now.

Bai bai

Article written by AA cup users and flat square ass and post by AA cup size with similar square small bony ass TS.

Yep... got some AA with small square bone ass clan in the K/tard world. Sad Life.

So the need for longer and bigger penises is okay and have competitive function, while bigger boobs, rounder asses have no function?

Okay, whatever...

Emm big tits, round ass

So gay

no.

big boobs n big butt are caused by high estrogen level

its a clear indication for man that that woman is fertile and ready to be mated.

There is no benefit in telling the world big breasts and round butts have no practical functions, no money to be made.
In fact, telling them the opposite would sell more "products" to increase breast or buttock size.

You are lying and just guessing.

Well, according to the data, I dont do the research. lol

Those are fat tissues, no correlation in any research done.

As long as your didi happy

A new study explores the issue: "Are fat-bottomed girls smarter?" Researchers at the University of Pittsburgh and the University of California at Santa Barbara put it scientifically: "Is gluteofemoral fat a privileged store of neurodevelopmental resources?"

According to the Chicago Tribune, the answer is a resounding "yes." And there is icing on the cake. Researchers claim that broad-bottomed women also have smarter children.

In a study of more than 16,000 women, the curvy girls consistently outscored their skinny counterparts on intelligence tests. And there is icing on the cake. Children of curvier women outscored the children of slender moms too.

However, it is not simply a big butt that indicates a high IQ. What matters is the size of your hips in relation to the size of your waist.

estrogen is female sex hormone #fact


higher sexual hormone during puberty leads to more developed breast and buttock size by promoting growth and accumulation of adipose(fat) tissue in that key area #fact

low estrogen level in women leads to possibility of suppression of ovulation and inadequate thickening of endometrial wall #fact

are u a woman? do u know why ur breast swells and feel tender ard the time u gonna menstruate?

This post has been edited by kurangak: Dec 19 2015, 04:07 PM

Well that's interesting, the articles dont have any citation to factual sources and different sites actually quoted different university, all without citation.
Even funnier when most of the sites are tabloid sites and promoting Kim Kardashian for some reason.
I cant even find any third party verification.


Not much difference for me, my mother, my sister and about any female friends and relatives I know, only pregnancy have shown visible size differences.
May I know where you get these "data" from?

Skinny girls are obviously not getting enough nutrition, which means their kids won't be as healthy.

Big booty and nen-nen girl are healthier, which means babies also healthier.

Also? Who say no evolutionary purpose? Girls with big booty and nen-nen are more likely to get wealthier husbands which means more and healthier babies too.

Those girls who say no evolutionary purpose just jelly they don't have big booty and nen-nen.

Dude, you are confused. What this article says is:

The whole article, despite mentioning childbirth, actually focuses on locomotion.

As for the other article...

Babies of other primates do not have large brains, so large hip for easy child birth is not required. We just can't compare human to other primates.

This post has been edited by river.sand: Dec 19 2015, 06:05 PM

but big boobs = higher confidence liao... my boobs are small, thus i has little confidence

Ts Bodo.

It's about fertility. Aka sex hormones

But there are other theories...
http://www.livescience.com/32745-why-do-wo...ve-breasts.html

kesian ts, dint evolve correctly, its for the offspring duh

TS, how bout your puberty transformation? Ada bulat bulat?

That's interesting.

Everyone has some?

I tasted more than 1 handful

Conclusion yes asset is vital hhhnnggghhh

did you even read the article you linked?

from the books n literatures that i studied back in university time. n experience told by my ex gfs n my wife.

btw do u take birth control pills? do u know the mechanism of action of those pills?

This post has been edited by kurangak: Dec 19 2015, 07:51 PM

Taking pills just for sex is disturbing, no.
You have to give me better sources, I cant trust you by your words alone.

This post has been edited by StephMujan: Dec 19 2015, 11:01 PM

Tak suka pergi main bontot, nothing has changed alot in that area.

a simple google on those facts that ive given to u would be suffice...

dun expect me to spoonfeed u... besides all those literature that ive read is on hard copy. u dun expect me to gip u which page, wat title, wat publication number to u rite?

so u are big butt???

Em, I thought you made the claim first?
Burden of evidence is on the claimer?
If I made a claim and someone ask for evidence, do I ask them to provide the evidence instead? No logic right?

I'm not skinny, but not very curvy like movie stars.

why shud i? those were the things that i studied in books n on paper...

ok fine by me... u go find ganong's review of medical physiology, guyton n hall medical physiology, ob/gyn elsevier, lippincott pharmacology...page wat, u gonna search it urself its impossible for me to know/remember...

thats what came up in my mind... theres alot of ebook online for u to download...

This post has been edited by kurangak: Dec 20 2015, 01:02 AM

sapa bukak thread

Sorry, cant take your words without evidence.
"Google it" or "find it yourself" is not a good answer.

next article more niceee

http://www.theguardian.com/science/2010/au...-carole-bondage

Why does my girlfriend only achieve orgasm when tied up?

From anonymous male

Dear Carole, Why does my girlfriend enjoy being tied up? Sex always involves rope, handcuffs or restraints of some sort, and often uniforms. She is anything but submissive outside the bedroom, but seems unable to achieve orgasm without being restrained in some way.

When we have "vanilla" sex she enjoys it, but when tied she always has multiple orgasms. While I'm not complaining at her tastes, I'm not sure I can see the evolutionary benefit … apart from attracting men who are dominant in bed, which, at the risk of doing myself down, seems a dubious sort of goal at best.

(If it's all the same with you, in the event that you publish this, I'd rather remain anonymous: she reads the Guardian too.)

sure whatever

Bigger breast and ass means good genes.

Nowadays its not about the results.

Its more about who the hell funded the research.

came for drilz...

no drillz...

disappointed...

Cum for drills

But no drills

Disappointed