Manulife speaker is super bullish on India and China
Take his words with a grain of salt.
Fundsupermart.com v13, Merry X'mas and Happy 牛(bull!) Year
Fundsupermart.com v13, Merry X'mas and Happy 牛(bull!) Year
|
|
Jan 16 2016, 02:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#61
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
Manulife speaker is super bullish on India and China
Take his words with a grain of salt. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 16 2016, 08:14 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#62
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
Jan 16 2016, 08:18 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#63
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
Jan 16 2016, 09:53 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#64
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(eleven dragon @ Jan 16 2016, 08:30 PM) Still not too convinced with the India market...maybe already got too many recent negative perspectives on foreign equity fund..choose not to purchase, aka not to add another headache haha... hmm... don't know whet the PE of 6.2 is forward PE or trailing PE. I remember another guy mentioned that earnings are dropping. Even if economy improves, aunty/uncle investors may be reluctant to enter, after getting burned.Well, for China fund...just utilize 0.5% special rate to top up...with PE ratio of 6.2 and giant trillions foreign reserves, plus words of promise not to further devaluation of RMB from the Prime, i do believe that it is just a matter of time for China to get back to its growing track...at least sound more promising than India.... my 2cents haha... And don't trust the promise of no further RMB devaluation. Chairman of PBoC made similar promise last year. Regarding India, reform has stalled. But if Modi can eventually push through reform, things will be better. This post has been edited by river.sand: Jan 16 2016, 09:57 PM |
|
|
Jan 17 2016, 03:21 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#65
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
Jan 18 2016, 08:43 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#66
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
For those who are undecided over whether to buy Indian fund, here is something you may find interesting...
QUOTE Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi launched a number of initiatives on Saturday to support the country’s start-ups, including a 100 billion rupee ($1.5 billion) fund and a string of tax breaks for both the companies and their investors. Modi’s high-profile event in New Delhi – attended by hundreds of investors and entrepreneurs, including the founder of taxi-hailing app Uber, Travis Kalanick – promised a shot in the arm for the sector, with exemptions from tax and compliance inspections for three years. “Start-up does not mean a billion-dollar company where thousands of people work. It is about employing even five people, and developing India.” Modi unveiled plans for a new 100 billion rupee fund: a structured fund of funds that will invest in venture capital funds over a period of four years, financed by the government and the state-owned Life Insurance Corp.(LIC). He also said start-up companies would benefit from cheaper and faster patent applications, enjoying 80% rebates on the cost of patents. A mobile app would allow companies to be set up within a day, he promised. Moreover, they will be exempt from income tax for the first three years in which they make a profit. Their investors could also benefit: recognized funds of funds could see exemptions from capital gains tax, Modi said. http://fortune.com/2016/01/16/modi-india-s...=timehp-popular This post has been edited by river.sand: Jan 18 2016, 08:43 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 18 2016, 03:19 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#67
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(ZH888 @ Jan 18 2016, 02:50 PM) Bro, buy when down la, not buy when the market up Not as simple as that.wrong wrong thinking but its in the head of most of the investors Market drop 20% = 20% discount for the fund you bought. buy buy buy Now MEGA sale !!!! Buy if you believe the value will rebound. But if you don't know, just do DCA. Who knows there will be more discount next month... |
|
|
Jan 18 2016, 06:44 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#68
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
Jan 20 2016, 10:26 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#69
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
Jan 21 2016, 10:08 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#70
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(sunshine-kc @ Jan 21 2016, 10:02 PM) DAVOS Summit. For (1), if OPEC agree to cut production, oil prices will rebound.Please view what the Market Players are saying about the Current Sell-Off. Blame the 1) Oil & 2) CHINA So is there any resolution / solution to both the OIL and CHINA Problem ??? http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2016-...ff-in-equities- SIFUs ...... Please Comment. For (2), no easy solution. |
|
|
Jan 22 2016, 09:26 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#71
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
Jan 23 2016, 10:05 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#72
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
Jan 23 2016, 02:00 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#73
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(melz84 @ Jan 23 2016, 11:17 AM) not selling anything... You are not buying stocks directly. You are investing in UT, and paying for the salaries of the fund managers.since i just started investing.. my inv still a very small amount my whole portfolio is in red and negative ROI sifus.. do you think it's wise for me to hold them with a max stop loss at 20% of inv ? sorry.. i'm still a newb in all this.. I expect a good fund manage to cut loss for us. Well, unless the FM are lousy ones... |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 23 2016, 02:21 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#74
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(kimyee73 @ Jan 23 2016, 02:10 PM) For US stock need to wait till end of the month to know. Right now S&P 500 monthly chart is below it's 20 EMA. If this rally can't break 20 EMA and bounce back down, we could be in for a big crash. I tried technical analysis before, but struggled with it.May I know why you look at 20 EMA, and not 10 or some other numbers? How about some numbers Chinese like, such as: - 18, 28 - 7x7 = 49 |
|
|
Jan 23 2016, 09:14 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#75
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(j.passing.by @ Jan 23 2016, 02:37 PM) Depending on what category of funds - balanced or equity. The fund manager cannot pull out everything and swing from 100% to 0% as he likes. Only you can pull all out. Let's take equity fund as an example:What the FM can do is beating the fund's benchmark. He cannot 'cut loss' for every single investor... if investor buys lump-sum when the market is hot, that's the investor's problem, not the FM's. (A) Some stocks will still do well when the market is down. One example is KAREX in Bursa Malaysia; (B) Some stocks may have their prices beaten down, but long term prospect remain intact. MAYBANK may belong to this category. (Some would say AIRASIA and AAX too, but I am wary of airline stocks.) When (A) & (B) are excluded, there shouldn't be too many stocks which need to be disposed of. And when these stocks are sold, the money can be reinvested in undervalued stocks, i.e. those in category B. |
|
|
Jan 23 2016, 10:21 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#76
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
This thread seems to be active every Saturday evening
This post has been edited by river.sand: Jan 24 2016, 06:58 AM |
|
|
Jan 24 2016, 11:26 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#77
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(Vanguard 2015 @ Jan 24 2016, 10:46 PM) Bro, Monday is a public holiday. You can ask CIS on Tuesday. Please share their advice here if possible. Would they advise that:- If Fund A has positive correlation with Fund B, but negative correlation with Fund C and Fund D, that is not a problem.1. You have deworsified? 2. Over traded? 3. Did not follow VA or RSP? Without knowing your investor profile, I suspect the main problem is No. 1 above. This means you are buying too many funds which have a high degree of correlation. My own definition of high is 0.85 positive correlation and above. An e.g. of deworsification is when Fund A is selling Maybank at RM8 because he thinks it is too expensive. Fund B is buying Maybank at RM8 because he thinks it is cheap. As an investor, you are holding both Fund A and Fund B in your portfolio and paying the transaction costs for this Maybank deal. So what do you get at the end of the day? 1-1 = 0 The problem with over-diversification is that you have no time to monitor your investments. |
|
|
Jan 25 2016, 08:15 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#78
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(Vanguard 2015 @ Jan 24 2016, 11:51 PM) Eh? Apa cakap? I thought we are not supposed to monitor our investments for unit trusts? That's why we have fund managers to do the job? Daily monitoring is only if we are buying shares directly? Therefore only quarterly, half yearly or annual rebalancing is necessary for unit trusts? I don't monitor my UT investment daily, but I know there are some people here who compute IRR everyday Anyway, back to correlation coefficient... Portfolio A - 1 Asia ex Japan fund which makes up 40% of the portfolio Portfolio B - 2 Asia ex Japan funds, each makes up 20% of the portfolio Portfolio B is more diversified, and the two funds are positively correlated, but I don't see a problem with it. |
|
|
Jan 25 2016, 10:46 AM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#79
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2016, 07:30 PM
Return to original view | IPv6 | Post
#80
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,815 posts Joined: Feb 2012 |
QUOTE(lukenn @ Jan 25 2016, 12:59 PM) high correlation and high overlapping coverage is not necessarily a bad thing. Just remember to adjust the allocation.. One post from our Investment Con-sultan is better than 10 posts from ikan bilis like me eg : local equity allocation 40% ==> KGF 20% - or - local quitey allocation 40% ==> KGF 20% + EISC 20% |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0501sec
0.75
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 08:46 AM |