Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Military Thread V19
|
SUSKLboy92
|
Dec 10 2015, 02:07 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Dec 10 2015, 08:43 AM) In my opinion, armed UAVs have pretty much took over the light strike/reconnaissance airplane role. UAVs have tons more advantages in that role than a piloted plane. Any country that could afford UAVs has really no reason to go back to manned planes in that role.  Agreed, the loiter times are just unbeatable and air power has just about done all it can already. Reaper is doing a fantastic job in Iraq. These guys just wanna push their own pet ideas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKLboy92
|
Dec 10 2015, 02:12 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(azriel @ Dec 10 2015, 12:17 PM) Rafale is not bad, at present more mature than Typhoon though I still wish for the UK plane, its a fine craft and we should be seen to be working with our Commonwealth/FPDA partner. But as UK is not buying new Typhoons per SDSR 2015 as some had hoped, choosing to extend the life of its older variant, its unlikely we will consider the Typhoon...
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKLboy92
|
Dec 10 2015, 11:26 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Dec 10 2015, 06:38 PM) Did Putin just threaten to go NUCLEAR on ISIS? Russian leader says new cruise missiles can be equipped with warheads – but he hopes they would never http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-33...-need-them.html Dunno if this is supposed to be implying he will consider nuclear option to prop up Assad  I used to buy the army hard tack from pasar malams for hiking. They make good trail snacks and are less crumbly or prone to break compared to Lexus biscuits which my friends liked to eat.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKLboy92
|
Dec 11 2015, 04:35 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Dec 11 2015, 01:17 AM) If going on day hiking trips or weekend camping I think you can get away bring something more tasty and filling than dried food. Bring some fresh food like fruits or something you can cook. Armies intentionally have their rations long-lasting so that can be stored in warehouse for a long time, not for them to last on the field. A soldier can only bring so many ration packs. Also downside of food that last a long time is most of them taste real bad or over-preserved. I had Brahims packet curry, rice and instant noodles for mains. This was for a couple of 4-5 day hikes in Tmn Negara and 1 week-plus going up Tahan. I quite liked the biscuits, they're slightly sweetened as well which is great. Not sure what kind of "attack helicopter" you guys are asking for, but I sort of wish we could get those APWKS (sp?) guided Hydra rockets or a 20mm cannon of some kind. Need some kind of high explosive firepower to complement the machine guns. This post has been edited by KLboy92: Dec 11 2015, 04:37 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKLboy92
|
Dec 11 2015, 05:07 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Gregyong @ Dec 11 2015, 04:47 PM) Hindustan QC?  Which is why some people say PAK FA is dead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKLboy92
|
Dec 13 2015, 11:25 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Dec 13 2015, 11:09 PM) You have a good point on this volatile situation because Putin's astro forces doesn't seem to be much bombing the kurds that opposes Assad. Instead, concentrating more on the "Moderate terrorists FSA, Al Nusra & their affiliates". Probably, Putin's real objective is to secure the borders of Turkey & Jordan so that ISIS will be cut off from their logistical support. Finally, the kurds with the help of Putin will end the scurge of ISIS. Of course, Turkey will never let this scenario pan out. IMO Putin wants to court the Kurds away from the US and use them to annoy Turkey too, as Kurdistan is what Turkey absolutely does not want. In the long term a Russia-friendly Kurdistan can together with Syria block NATO's access to the Mid East region, maybe even topple Turkey's government. That will leave NATO with even less influence in the Mid East if they allow it to happen, or suck them into a proxy war against Kurdistan and Syria. All according to plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKLboy92
|
Dec 13 2015, 11:26 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Dec 13 2015, 08:07 PM) This Is Northrop Grumman's Idea Of A Sixth-Generation Fighter, But Is It Feasible? http://foxtrotalpha.jalopnik.com/this-is-n...Fgizmodo.com%2F Graphic artist: photoshop F35 head B2 tail, job done
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKLboy92
|
Dec 14 2015, 02:52 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Dec 14 2015, 01:43 AM) magnum punya website tarak boleh pakai..  nak order pun link takdak..nak pegi kedai jauh pulak.. segan pulak nanti orang kedai tak layan titeww yang badan kecik n pendek ni auww.. thinking of choosing between these two though, quite cheap..what do u think? DT 8" Side Zip Tactical Boots » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « and this Fifty-One 8'' Tactical Boots » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « You considered construction boots? I know its heavy but if you're willing to go tactical boots you can consider this option too. May be cheaper depending. Brands like Iron Steel, Red Wing...
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKLboy92
|
Dec 15 2015, 06:08 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(TechSuper @ Dec 15 2015, 01:27 PM) yes but do they have the benefit of doubt? UAV operators at base would have even more options than jet fighter WSOs. Because of the long loiter time they can check and double-check with other UAV assets, spec forces OPs, Rivet Joint, etc whereas a jet burns loads of precious fuel for every minute they're up there... and have to go home after anything over 30 to 45 mins max. Its all about an integrated strike complex rather than just 1 asset. The Jihadi John mission is a great example.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKLboy92
|
Dec 20 2015, 08:19 PM
|
Getting Started

|
Their new aircraft? Pilot error maybe?
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKLboy92
|
Dec 21 2015, 02:07 AM
|
Getting Started

|
Every new aircraft will have this kind of problems. Doesn't mean it sucks, though those with an agenda will try to use it to promote their cause.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKLboy92
|
Dec 21 2015, 08:46 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(azriel @ Dec 21 2015, 07:00 AM) Even a PAK-FA caught fire that doesn't mean the Russian are unreliable. Yeah it means the yindians are unreliable
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKLboy92
|
Dec 21 2015, 10:14 AM
|
Getting Started

|
With a new aircraft it could be anything. Past errors include pilot tertekan wrong switch, because in the new model its on the left side not the right side, pilot terlupa stall angle, terlupa climb rate, etc.
On the technical side, maintenance crews unfamiliar with the aircraft, terlupa buka dono what, maintain it improperly, left something open/shut, this thing jam that thing blocked.... with the new glass cockpits and fly by wire, electronic faults and system error or refresh or blue screen...
Apalagi during acrobatic manoeuvre. Really no point in pointing fingers in such a case.
This post has been edited by KLboy92: Dec 21 2015, 10:15 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKLboy92
|
Dec 21 2015, 11:33 AM
|
Getting Started

|
Mai gott... We've sunk down to buying Pakistani planes... to go with our top of the line F18s, SU30s and (fairly acceptable) Hawk 208s... cukur ekonomi masih baik
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKLboy92
|
Dec 21 2015, 03:21 PM
|
Getting Started

|
No, we should continue investing in ATGMs and put aside money for medium SAMs. The way its going, no offence but we can't rely on TUDM for air cover. And Syria and Yemen has shown that tank armour (well, excepting the full spec NATO/Russian armour) just can't beat ATGMs.
Speaking of tokok show... when I was in Beijing I had a look at their military channel... brainwash more than RTM mang
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKLboy92
|
Dec 21 2015, 04:22 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(cunnilinguist @ Dec 21 2015, 04:16 PM) I don't suppose you know that we bought plenty of stuff from Pakistan. Really what? *brace for impact* QUOTE(cunnilinguist @ Dec 21 2015, 04:07 PM) If they're going to buy up to 36 MRCA, I don't have problem with them retiring the Migs. Rafale offer sounds good tbh. Not just we're going to get a navalized Rafale, but also M-346 for free (It's high time to retire the 108s anyway) Bbbbut.... India Mindef says Rafale and Typhoon deal lebih kurang same price, when support etc all included... I wants my Typhoons
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKLboy92
|
Dec 21 2015, 04:51 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Gregyong @ Dec 21 2015, 04:28 PM) typhoon was originally designed to be air superiority only, the multirole capabilities were tacked on, while the rafale is more or less like the french F18. Typhoon Tranche 3 compared to Tranche 1 is like FA18 and F18, different beast. Anyway I'm joking, just fanboying over Typhoon... maybe we really should go Rafale its more developed and quite sexy too QUOTE(cunnilinguist @ Dec 21 2015, 04:27 PM) We bought our RPG-7, ATGM, Manpads, even MP-5 and MG-3 parts from Pakistan Its ok tu kira not Pakistan... like iphone is not Chinese  its just that Paki plane look weird next to these Russian/Western aircraft
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKLboy92
|
Dec 21 2015, 08:29 PM
|
Getting Started

|
Meh.... RT, Sputniknews, Southfront all Kremlin source...
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSKLboy92
|
Dec 21 2015, 10:39 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Dec 21 2015, 10:27 PM) basically we maritime nation, fighter we buy sure will have stronger resistance to salinity ... even helicopter we got, all will meet out environment and weather .... like Su-30 also no issue on Naval strike, all multi-role fighter no issue on Naval strike capability. i don't think RMAF will keen other F18. buying new F-18 is more not worth ...end life product..... end technology. no more future upgrade. both D/F block2 already end production only have is F block3 which no one buying yet. Super Hornet lifetime costs are not much cheaper than Typhoon, Rafale or even yes the mass production F-35. That being said F-35 would be a bad buy for us as its electronic capabilities are potentially even more important than its stealthiness. Edit: and we have no way to utilise that capability. I begin to think, given the earlier comment about needing to buy a fighter for the next 30 years, we should opt into the Korean or Japanese programs.... This post has been edited by KLboy92: Dec 21 2015, 10:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|