Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V19

views
     
SUSKLboy92
post Feb 14 2016, 03:24 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
Su30MKM, Rafale and F22 together... dayummm
SUSKLboy92
post Feb 15 2016, 12:45 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Feb 14 2016, 10:41 PM)
You just pointed out the symptom of this affair: IEDs are more numerous and effective these days because western forces in Afghanistan and Iraq are too bound to the sparse road network. The fact that they need roads for their heavy wheeled armored vehicles like the MRAPs & Strykers and only some few good roads that are available in these countries literally funnel the vehicles into easily mined and ambushed territory. 

Insurgents could safely guess which road a patrol will go through due to the lack of good roads able to take the weight of a heavy wheeled vehicle. Just bury an IED on a road near a significant village or town and you're bound to get some military patrol coming through there eventually.

To avoid the IEDs being detonated by regular traffic, insurgents have learned the absurdly simple method  of burying the detonator system at a certain depth where the only the heavier weight of an armored vehicle will detonate it and not lighter everyday vehicles.
*
You been reading the M113 nuts izit? laugh.gif

In Afghanistan wherever tracks are needed they do employ tracks. Iraq is not Afghanistan, its much more developed. The vehicle is travelling on roads through towns and farmland where offroading is not always possible. The insurgents are also smart enough to put the IEDs at choke points where offroading is not possible.

Stryker and other wheeled APCs complement tracked APCs by offering different capabilities. This is recognised in both doctrine and practice. Strykers are usually assigned to urban areas where they can outrun tracked vehicles on roads. And they equip formations which have been riding in nothing thicker than Humvees. Something the Stryker critics conveniently omit to mention.

This post has been edited by KLboy92: Feb 15 2016, 12:48 AM
SUSKLboy92
post Feb 17 2016, 05:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(IReallyNeed Answers @ Feb 17 2016, 04:27 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


why is it with such formidable power they still cant defense themsleve against the NK?

i kept on reading that SK will only be able to fight back with US help, and that also after NK steamroller it's way all the way till seoul first!
*
Look at a map of Korea, Seoul is quite near to the NK border. Definitely within range of missile artillery, especially if Kaesong is turned into a military camp like NK threaten. SK should invest in Iron Dome type defence and C-RAM IMHO.
SUSKLboy92
post Feb 18 2016, 09:55 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(DDG_Ross @ Feb 18 2016, 12:31 AM)
nk got prc, just like sk got usa

yes seoul is sacrificial lamb, too close to the border
analyst predicted the nk artillery barrage could be up to anywhere at half million rounds per hour
*
Don't think got so teruk lah. Seoul is quite a bit beyond most tube artillery range y'know and even most multiple missile artillery tops at about 60-80km. So what Seoul might face would be SRBMs, the longer ranged Grad missiles and maybe the biggest howitzers NK have unless they invade and successfully set up ALL their artillery inside SK with no interference from SK air/arty... which is highly unlikely.
SUSKLboy92
post Feb 20 2016, 12:19 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
What's the betting that Israel and Saudi have had secret talks and pressuring Lebanon to freeze Hezbollah is part of the deal?
SUSKLboy92
post Feb 23 2016, 04:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
http://theaviationist.com/2016/02/15/tu214...loyed-to-syria/

QUOTE
Russia has just deployed its most advanced spyplane to Syria

The Tu-214R is a Russian ISR (Intelligence Surveillance Reconnaissance) aircraft. In other words, a quite advanced spyplane. As we have already explained here in the past, it is a special mission aircraft equipped with all-weather radar systems and electro optical sensors that produce photo-like imagery of a large parts of the ground: these images are then used to identify and map the position of the enemy forces, even if these are camouflaged or hidden. The aircraft is known to carry sensor packages to perform ELINT (Electronic Intelligence) and SIGINT (Signal Intelligence) missions: the antennae of the Tu-214R can intercept the signals emitted by the enemy systems (radars,aircraft, radios, combat vehicles, mobile phones etc) so as it can build the EOB (Electronic Order of Battle) of the enemy forces: where the enemy forces are operating, what kind of equipment they are using and, by eavesdropping into their radio/phone communications, what they are doing and whatwill be their next move.The aircraft is built by KAPO (Kazan Aircraft Production Association) and flown from the company’s airfield in Kazan.On Feb. 15, the Tu-214R registered RA-64514, serial number 42305014, the second of the two examples of this kind of aircraft built under contract with Russia’s Ministry of Defense,flew fromKazan to Latakia airbase, Syria.

With its ADS-B transponder signals broadcast in the clear and detected by Flightradar24 collecting stations, the aircraft could be tracked as it followed the eastern corridor from Russia, to the Caspian Sea and then to Syria via the Iranian and Iraqi airspaces. It’s not clear whether the aircrafthas already been delivered to the Russian Air Force, even though it is quite weird that a developmental aircraft is deployed abroad (unless the reason is testing it at war in a real scenario…).While it was still under development, the same Tu-214R aircraft flew what appeared to be an operative mission on Jun. 18, 2015, when it flew from Kazan to Crimea and back, closely following the border between Russia and Ukraine, most probably testing some of its sensors against real targets. Previously, the aircraft was spotted flying near Crimea.

Interestingly, while over the Caspian Sea, approaching the Iranian airspace, the Tu-214R performed a couple of 360° turns at 33.000 feet (weird, while enroute): maybe it was working on the diplomatic clearence to enter Iran?

SUSKLboy92
post Feb 24 2016, 07:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(Fat & Fluffy @ Feb 24 2016, 12:25 AM)
no matter what, it is still one of the strongest in the world.. without US's assistance, they can roll into europe n might even manage to take over it
donation  hmm.gif
*
Russia could have parity with NATO I think, except NATO is usually committed to the various 'sandboxes' and notoriously slow acting whistling.gif
SUSKLboy92
post Feb 26 2016, 10:26 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Feb 26 2016, 10:14 AM)
Well, actually its relatively possible to detect stealth technology. Certain wavelength of radar waves, using different radar transmitter and receiver stations all can possibly detect stealth aircraft.

You can also look for disturbances the aircraft causes in the atmosphere rather than looking for the aircraft itself. You can potentially use a Schlieren telescope to detect the movement of atmospheric disturbances as a stealth aircraft moves through the atmosphere.

user posted image
A photograph of a fighter jet's atmospheric disturbances taken from a Schlieren telescope

Basic radar computers and tech are also increasing in complexity and capability, so its entirely possible even basic modern radars can already detect older 1980's-level stealth technology.
*
Keyword, as the article says, is getting targeting locks. But WIB say anything about F35 don't need need hear IMO...

Radar station on that little island? Looks like a perfect target for Tomahawks.
SUSKLboy92
post Feb 26 2016, 02:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Feb 26 2016, 01:15 PM)
Soviet and China style air forces are very big on ground radar-controlled fighter deployments. So they have the advantage of having a bigger picture than individual fighter squadrons acting on it alone without AWACS. So ground controller can potentially 'see' better and have a clearer view of the situation than its fighters the air and guide them to their targets accordingly.

History has shown many examples of 'obsolete' fighters taking on state-of-the-art fighters and shown at least parity with them, with the help of ground controllers.
*
Indeed. But no US fighter is going to go into combat without AWACS cover. Not to mention the sheer amount of jammers that will be directed on that radar.

I don't see why F22s won't be used to penetrate SAM radar networks, that was exactly how they were used in Syria. And Big Daddy haven't been mentioned yet: the B-2 Spirit.
SUSKLboy92
post Feb 26 2016, 02:29 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(yinchet @ Feb 26 2016, 02:10 PM)
Currently hardly any stealth fighter/bomber going to be first to attack.
It usually start with a massive ew and cruise missile spamming for sead ops.
But than again these strategy only work against smaller country.
How well it will perform against russian and china is a big question.
*
why not? just back to Cold War ops.

damnit, our quiet corner of the world suddenly not so quiet vmad.gif
SUSKLboy92
post Feb 26 2016, 10:35 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(Frozen_Sun @ Feb 26 2016, 10:19 PM)
T-90SM with Relikt ERA is even better.....Perhaps what's in Syria is Russian-provided T-90A with Kontakt-5
*
IINM T-90A is for domestic use while T-90S is export variant? could be wrong... Syria T-90 is supposed to be A variant.

Syrian FSA TOW is supposed to be improved E variant, looks like bad news for TOW vs T-90A but we haven't seen the top attack F variant in use yet brows.gif

video mana? maybe the tank damaged but didn't explode...
SUSKLboy92
post Feb 27 2016, 03:05 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Feb 27 2016, 12:59 AM)
Those Russian military advisors should really kick those Syrian forces' asses into attention. With some semblance of proper discipline and tactics, they could've had a much better situation than they are now in.
*
I don't recall where but I read of an informal meetup between Russian and US advisors where they agreed that their respective Arab advisees are just... really shit at taking instruction laugh.gif
SUSKLboy92
post Feb 28 2016, 04:56 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy


Nice video of Arena APS.
SUSKLboy92
post Mar 1 2016, 07:04 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
189 posts

Joined: Aug 2015
From: Cherasboy
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Mar 1 2016, 06:41 PM)
China Security: China’s Strategy to Bar Other Nations From Disputed Waters Is Nearly Complete

user posted image
http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/1979371-ch...early-complete/
*
"Now witness the firepower of this fully armed and operational battle station!"

5 Pages « < 3 4 5
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0623sec    0.61    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 7th December 2025 - 11:56 AM