It's so true. Yes, we have had a bad run of result for the first half of the season, but I don't think he should be the one shouldering the blame. Week in week out the players just disappointing to watch and yet in the end he's the one who got sacked.

No wonder we have become the laughing stock for other supporters and we truly deserved to be trolled. Looks like Hiddink is the one going to helm the post till end of the season but I'm just wondering, how are we going to build a dynasty if we keep on switching the gaffer?

Chelsea civil war end now, those crying babies should perform again for the club. If continue with shit performance Chelsea should consider sell them ASAP during January window transfer.

no more dynasty building. back to trophy hunting

Demba Ba has shed light on the managerial methods that led Chelsea to sack Jose Mourinho, describing the Portuguese's style as "very exhausting" and admitting that he is not a coach who looks to rebuild the confidence of his players.

"We've seen it in the past," Ba told French radio station RMC. "It's very tiring -- very exhausting -- because he demands a huge amount. He wants to try to push his players to their limit to know what they have. That's also one of his methods of working.

"He's not someone who's there to give confidence to the players -- he's there to get what he can out of them. And if a player lacks confidence, it's not him who'll give it back to them. He's going to rely on someone else who is confident. If you don't have confidence all he's going to do is to put you on the bench."

"The only times where it was tense was when we lost, so I think that if in the Chelsea dressing room it's been tense in the past few months it's because they weren't getting results," he added.

"He's someone who loves to win and when he loses, you would say that the sky has fallen in on his head. As long as there isn't another win, it's a bit difficult because he's annoyed ... when he loses, it hurts him.

"He's good, he's proved it, he's won a huge number of trophies. After that you like him or you don't like him -- he doesn't leave you indifferent.

"I'm talking about the manager, not the man."

It's so true. Yes, we have had a bad run of result for the first half of the season, but I don't think he should be the one shouldering the blame. Week in week out the players just disappointing to watch and yet in the end he's the one who got sacked.

No wonder we have become the laughing stock for other supporters and we truly deserved to be trolled. Looks like Hiddink is the one going to helm the post till end of the season but I'm just wondering, how are we going to build a dynasty if we keep on switching the gaffer?

Don't write off Mohrinho just yet from the PL. Manchester united is lurking

One of the best and most accomplished manager in the world.

ya..  simeone for specialone

really?
some mu fans claiming Mou only know how to park bus
they will accept this new philosophy?

when this play style in blue is call park the bus...
when this happen in red is call wise....

I think if he goes to MU. He will be happy because the current generation except dor 2 or 3 players are suited for counterattacking football. Plus he very much will have a big piggybank to buy players.

In sentimental sense, the sacking of Mou makes no sense. Roman is a businessman afterall, his sight has always been on how to earn money etc. Maybe he was already thinking no CL next season to generate revenue for us dy.

Choose between sacking Mou and sacking the players n sign new blood. Roman chose the easier and cost saving method, sack manager. It will cost so much to change a new batch of player in the team.

In the end, Business 1 Football 0. Its all in d  business game. Roman x mau spend big on overhauling d squad dy, since a lot of money has been used on the new stadium, renting Wembley stadium while they build us a new stadium. All this nid big money.

Kudos to Mou for understanding it. He noes the club recently nid d money for stadium purpose, rebuilding purpose. Kudos to Mou for waiving off the 40m compensation. He really loves and thinks for the club, even when he is sacked.

u hav to kesian roman oso la, he ledi spent more than 2 billion on chelsea ledi n ledi written off the 2 billion owed to him, not many owners r willing to do dat, his fortune is oni arnd 10 billion, if he is as rich as bill gates then he cn spend more la

n mourinho did ask for 40 million, but chelsea lawyers refused it n oni gave him 10 million instead

Its all the money game

Is it? I read got 2 version. 1 version said Mou breach d contract coz Eva sued him in some court. 2nd version is Mou refuses to accept the 40m. Lol

when this play style in blue is call park the bus...
when this happen in red is call wise....

I think if he goes to MU. He will be happy because the current generation except for 2 or 3 players are suited for counterattacking football. Plus he very much will have a big piggybank to buy players.

u hav to kesian roman oso la, he ledi spent more than 2 billion on chelsea ledi n ledi written off the 2 billion owed to him, not many owners r willing to do dat, his fortune is oni arnd 10 billion, if he is as rich as bill gates then he cn spend more la

n mourinho did ask for 40 million, but chelsea lawyers refused it n oni gave him 10 million instead

LOL...... epic
whoever the chelsea manager, chelsea only park bus

100m at least to buy players he want
source?
BBC reported Mou refused to accept 40m