QUOTE(joe_mamak @ Nov 2 2015, 01:28 PM)
I can't agree with you.
Arul didn't even agree to the first invitation, so all bets are off.
Tony Pua made a new offer after seeing Arul happily go on Bernama TV. This is important to note.
I am guessing Tony Pua thinks he can do a far better job than the Bernama TV interviewer.
Hence, the new offer or challenge.
Nothing chicken about that.
If Arul is given free rein, I think the show would feature questions from Arul such as -
"Did you meet Justo?"
"Did you expose any information that you know first hand from PAC meetings?"
Etc. etc.
And we won't be any closer to finding out the truth about 1MDB.
If it needs to be a Q & A, a prosecution trial style, they have PAC to do it, and you can't say its not helpful because Tony himself is sitting on the board, so why the need to have another repeated process for such trial? I mean...what is the impact for doing the same thing at 2 different place?
If you say it is a both side Q&A, then it is different from questioning like what they can do in PAC, and everyone can know the truth for both side, then it is worth doing it infront of public.
and I don't think tony will be afraid of those questions? OR is he?
comon la, Tony is like a bull, running into every single trap laid by najib and his cronies, please ask him to think twice before spitting out a statement, after all his statement have public impact, unlike /k/ where people can kopitiam whatever they can.
PS
don't really care about LSS also