ct2 shoeboxes.
some of the rooms is so small, it's rather unpleasant.
i.e 3 bedrooms unit, the 3rd bedroom can barely squeeze in a single bedder, the 2nd bedroom wall to wall is so tight that once you factor in the bed and wardrobe, hardly any space left.
having said that, ct2, freehold, consider prime city center location, low absolute price.
some of the things which i find a bit puzzling.
2 pools and all towards the front is a bit mind boggling. what is the appeal to tower b and c then?
ct1 design and layout i felt is more appropriate. with the bigger size of course resulting in higher absolute price.
funny thing is with past projects of 1 follow by the 2nd in same series, the former usually prevails.
casa indah 1&2, ken 1,2,3, casa kiara 1&2, midfields 1&2, capers & fennel, etc.
just find it puzzling since logic dictates the later the launches, the better the product is suppose to be?
You mean logically projects suppose to be better if it's newer but it's not happening for the projects you mentioned?