LCD Thread Ver 3.1, Everything about LCD monitor
|
|
 Apr 16 2007, 09:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
 
Senior Member
3,945 posts Joined: Jan 2003 
|
QUOTE(eeynhoj @ Apr 16 2007, 02:22 AM) which brand of LCD provide better warranty?? warranty is standard for every LCD in the market is usually 3 years, while DELL provide 5 years when you pay slighly extra for the extended warranty   . |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 17 2007, 09:29 AM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
|
Senior Member
3,945 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(viewview @ Apr 17 2007, 01:24 AM) sorry a noob here... just wondering how to check whether is it an S-IPS or S- read my siggie.. PVA for the 24"? I heard there are some steps to log into the menu and check.. tq  |
|
|
Apr 18 2007, 09:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
|
Senior Member
3,945 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(john@ @ Apr 18 2007, 08:16 AM) From the tech spec i read from dell website, the response time for dell2007wfp is 16ms, is it good enuff for gaming? the 16ms(S-IPS) but it is said to be equivalent to those 4-6ms(TN) in the market...but then it could be lower than 4mslook at the link below http://www.lesnumeriques.com/duels.php?ty=...06&p2=1042&ph=1 even the samsung is rated at 2ms, the ghosting is still more visible than the 16ms dell... the first rule of buying LCD panel is..the response time and contrast ratio doesn't reflect what they are in actual world. Different manufacturer has their own calculation, there is no standard when showing such information. This post has been edited by lonewolf: Apr 18 2007, 09:34 AM |
|
|
Apr 18 2007, 06:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
|
Senior Member
3,945 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(john@ @ Apr 18 2007, 02:41 PM) Thanks lonewolf and bUGG for the explanation. not only that..even the contrast ratio is the samething..some uses dynamic contras ratio, while some use rated/optimum contras ratio (not sure what was the actual term)..Yeah, i continue to search for the review for 2007wfp and found the following comparison: http://www.pureoverclock.com/review.php?id=637&page=8 As conclusion, dell2007WFP's 16ms (or 8ms grey to grey) is far better than samsung 205BW's 2ms in response time. So, the 2ms is kind of deceiving, dun u think?  Sad to say after last weekend's pc fair, dell's monitor price rise up already  Added on April 18, 2007, 6:44 pm QUOTE(NickedAsy @ Apr 18 2007, 05:56 PM) Hey guys, according to someone in the forums, they said the 226BW 'S' panel is no longer in production as of now, and the 'C' panel is by far the best for now. Any truths in that? huh?..aren't all the 22" wide from Chi-Mei..?..am i missing something. This post has been edited by lonewolf: Apr 18 2007, 06:44 PM |
|
|
Apr 18 2007, 10:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
|
Senior Member
3,945 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(pohpiah @ Apr 18 2007, 08:58 PM) Sorry to interrupt the thread, but aiyoh someone took pictures of his Eizo screen and it looks amazing!! $$ oso very http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1180814  |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0162sec
 0.69
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 09:07 PM |
Quote