QUOTE(benny888 @ Oct 10 2015, 06:53 AM)
Anandtech review of the TSMC n Samsung chip. Read their conclusion summary. Is non conclusive. Basically I feel is just an overblown issue.
http://www.anandtech.com/show/9708/analyzi...-and-samsung-a9
Quote
THE CONCLUSION
Wrapping things up then, where do we stand? The short answer is that all we know is that we don't know. What we know is that there isn't enough information currently out there to accurately determine whether the TSMC or Samsung A9 SoC has better power consumption, and more importantly just how large any difference might be. 1-on-1 comparisons under controlled conditions can provide us with some insight in to how the TSMC and Samsung A9s compare, but due to the natural variation in chip quality, it's possible to end up testing two atypical phones and never know it.
To that end I suspect that Apple's statement is not all that far off. They are of course one of the few parties able to actually analyze a large number of phones, and perhaps more to the point, having a wide variation in battery life on phones - even if every phone meets the minimum specifications - is not a great thing for Apple. It can cause buyers to start hunting down phones with "golden" A9s, and make other buyers feel like they've been swindled by not receiving an A9 with as low the power consumption as someone else. To be clear there will always be some variance and this is normal and expected, but if Apple has done their homework they should have it well understood and reasonably narrow. The big risk to Apple is that dual sourcing A9s in this fashion makes that task all the harder, which is one of the reasons why SoCs are rarely dual sourced.
Still back to the same thing. Double sourcing a bad thing. Make consumer concerned for price point they are already paying. Everyone wants to have the best of chips as already paying 4K for a phone. http://www.anandtech.com/show/9708/analyzi...-and-samsung-a9
Quote
THE CONCLUSION
Wrapping things up then, where do we stand? The short answer is that all we know is that we don't know. What we know is that there isn't enough information currently out there to accurately determine whether the TSMC or Samsung A9 SoC has better power consumption, and more importantly just how large any difference might be. 1-on-1 comparisons under controlled conditions can provide us with some insight in to how the TSMC and Samsung A9s compare, but due to the natural variation in chip quality, it's possible to end up testing two atypical phones and never know it.
To that end I suspect that Apple's statement is not all that far off. They are of course one of the few parties able to actually analyze a large number of phones, and perhaps more to the point, having a wide variation in battery life on phones - even if every phone meets the minimum specifications - is not a great thing for Apple. It can cause buyers to start hunting down phones with "golden" A9s, and make other buyers feel like they've been swindled by not receiving an A9 with as low the power consumption as someone else. To be clear there will always be some variance and this is normal and expected, but if Apple has done their homework they should have it well understood and reasonably narrow. The big risk to Apple is that dual sourcing A9s in this fashion makes that task all the harder, which is one of the reasons why SoCs are rarely dual sourced.
The discomfort perfectionist nagging feeling will always be there, especially with Apple fans who always want to get the best and latest. Every time they feel like their battery did not last long( always have that concern after iOS updates), they will question izzit bcoz of their Samsung chip causing that.
I guess it will be good for Apple, as those in doubt will get ip7 next year to try their luck on better chip.
Hopefully no more double sourcing in ip7.
This post has been edited by 666devil: Oct 10 2015, 07:25 AM
Oct 10 2015, 07:00 AM

Quote
0.0538sec
0.78
7 queries
GZIP Disabled