Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V18

views
     
thpace
post Oct 3 2015, 09:29 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


this would have been a better option instead of our open top mortar variant
thpace
post Oct 9 2015, 10:59 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Oct 9 2015, 12:30 AM)
Malaysia are offered to join the JSF programme back in... aku pun dah lupa
but we politely decline and give janji palsu kata nak beli super hornet  tongue.gif
*
We was also offered to participate in the pak fa also right?
thpace
post Oct 9 2015, 04:54 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Oct 9 2015, 04:18 PM)
not even close to mature
plus the amount to join the program is too expensive
that's the prototype iinm
yep by the India and the Russian
Not even close to operation pun
All government car and gomen car no need to pay toll
but state government need to pay
*
Indian version is the two seater which really appeal to us
thpace
post Oct 11 2015, 01:19 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(HangPC2 @ Oct 11 2015, 01:16 AM)

*
canot bramoh too expensive to waste on tent ppl.
thpace
post Oct 12 2015, 08:58 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Oct 12 2015, 06:29 PM)
Malaysia and Singapore Have Trouble Putting Out Fire

user posted image
http://en.tempo.co/read/news/2015/10/12/05...utting-Out-Fire
*
dint know we have chinook drool.gif

thpace
post Oct 18 2015, 02:51 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(SouzaDE @ Oct 18 2015, 07:42 AM)
It has been said many times. Russian do very much like what US did in first Gulfwar. Why? No money for smart weapons? No. it's stock clearance.
*
It cheaper plus unlike US which have a law to minimize surrounding damage and casulties. Russian does not apply the same rule

That why the saying for russian operation style

Terroist 10k

Civilian 5k

Total body count 15k

Mission sucessful
thpace
post Oct 19 2015, 01:01 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(KLboy92 @ Oct 19 2015, 12:59 AM)
Sorry I'm gonna ask for proof. Because the amount of SOPs and public criticism the US army incurs re: reducing collateral damage doesn't seem to indicate such an attitude. Mistakes happen and they've certainly killed their share of civvies. But they practically invented the whole idea of precision guided munitions and less-lethal ordnance whereas Russia is most well known for their artillery barrages and flamethrower weapons.
*
He will give the total casualties through out the war for certain by us alone

He should wait for the same total time with russian operation and compare.
thpace
post Oct 19 2015, 10:48 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Oct 19 2015, 10:41 PM)
looks like more just a hear say to me
*
some hear say have a point.. his is more i say but instead of i hear from other.. i create my ownself
thpace
post Oct 19 2015, 10:50 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Oct 19 2015, 10:41 PM)
looks like more just a hear say to me
*
anyway.. ada desus desis say sgpv batch 2 is in early discussion..

oh well, i think it more of testing the water and see how deep it goes
thpace
post Oct 19 2015, 11:34 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Oct 19 2015, 11:29 PM)
some hearsay is true, for example
our involvement with MILF now MNLF were even confirm at one point on including monetary aid towards them
but you have to see from our POV, at that time we were technically in dispute with Indonesia at the waters of Sabah regarding Sipadan and Ligitan
enough about that

there is as the NGPV 2nd batch is no technically impossible as we have a problem with the rights with Blohm and Voss
*
i still unclear about the right dispute on the ngpv

so far i know there a poor quality control.. defects list bunch of them. Given they are Blohm and Voss and a reputable one, i doubt they would allow that to tarnish their reputation


thpace
post Oct 19 2015, 11:35 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(BorneoAlliance @ Oct 19 2015, 11:31 PM)
boss 2008


7 year ago news
thpace
post Oct 19 2015, 11:39 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(atreyuangel @ Oct 19 2015, 11:36 PM)
lel this Hamas story again?
the story was made to misguide people and apparently they worked

well do you know that there is even a ex sarayat matkal commando come to Malaysia and play motor glider.
how you say? it's easy he has dual citizen ship and he enter Malaysia with EU (iinm can't remember which) passport.

it's easy here in Malaysia, you come here you pay you fly.
and it's easy to bend the story to suit you.
*
guess the army intelligence is hard at work also not duduk saja whistling.gif
thpace
post Oct 20 2015, 12:15 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(hafizushi @ Oct 20 2015, 12:03 AM)
Recently MMP have been reporting the navy have propose a budget to upgrade all ngpv, two of them will be fully arm with ASM and Anti-air missile
*
old news

proposal.. budget not released
thpace
post Oct 24 2015, 12:41 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(kerolzarmyfanboy @ Oct 23 2015, 11:23 PM)
why they always offer F-16 instead of...idk F-15 or F-18 maybe...
*
because they already operating f16 already
thpace
post Oct 24 2015, 01:14 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(alaskanbunny @ Oct 24 2015, 01:09 AM)
it is not only them..
*
yayaya.. your beloved SG operating them as well. ok anymore? move on sweat.gif
thpace
post Oct 27 2015, 09:45 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(IReallyNeed Answers @ Oct 27 2015, 09:04 AM)
ini comparison so bias,

the writer must be Dassult employee
*
I can say malaysia evaluation for our mrca is almost similar. Rafale is the better of the bunch just that the price tag is mahal gila
thpace
post Oct 27 2015, 10:03 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(AxeFire @ Oct 27 2015, 09:49 AM)
Super Hornet vs Eurofighter vs Rafale

hmm.gif  hmm.gif  hmm.gif
*
U can go ask around. If not for the price tag. Rafale would have been chosen earlier on.

Super hornet need to keep big boss happy
thpace
post Oct 29 2015, 11:22 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(cunnilinguist @ Oct 29 2015, 11:12 PM)
I have reservation towards the decision of acquiring MD530G. Not only that the helicopter doesn't have support facilities that is currently enjoyed by Eurocopter/Airbus helos, it also has lower range and minimally equipped, something that Afghani pilots complained during operation against Taliban.

Somehow, I'm interested with Airbus LAH helicopter. It could double as attack helicopter as well as troop transport and is cheaper than dedicated attack helicopters. Even the market segment is geared towards countries that need a gunship but reluctant to spend on, let say, an Apache

user posted image
*
Pls avoid airbuss military products if you are early customer or adopter

Example of EC725 and a400 early stage is already good enough for us.




thpace
post Oct 31 2015, 10:51 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(Gregyong @ Oct 31 2015, 10:37 AM)
average joe don't know enough to judge, but still spew out stuff like political ammo......Maybe should have considered a Mi24 so can carry Paskau inside to act as a flying police vehicle so people have less to complain tongue.gif
*
Mi24 is notoriously hard to find spare parts and need to maintain depot for constant operation..

The ka52 is expensive even for our standard
thpace
post Oct 31 2015, 02:26 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Oct 31 2015, 01:01 PM)
Huh? so many more poorer third-world countries like Sudan, Kenya and Zimbabwe also use Mi-24 but I haven't heard that they have many problems with spare parts and supplies. Also some Mi-24 parts are also compatible with Mi-8 transport helicopters, which even more countries currently use, so its not like the Mi-24 a unique one of a kind helicopter with specialized parts.

Also what aircraft doesn't need depot for constant operation?  laugh.gif
*
U should be asking the question how many are actually flying by canabilizing parts before actual replacement arrive.


4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0648sec    0.37    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 08:34 PM