Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Investment TR RESIDENCE @ JALAN TUN RAZAK [OWNERS' THREAD], The Awakening of the City Centre Begins
|
gks
|
Mar 8 2017, 01:22 PM
|
|
MKH made mistake by putting the lifts at both ends
they should make all the lifts in center core, with 5+1 configuration.
Or they can split the lifts to low zone and high zone.
All these measure will help a little to reduce the waiting time.
Nevertheless from purchasers and tenants POV, they normally wouldn't go too much in the details.... until when they move in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gks
|
Mar 8 2017, 01:38 PM
|
|
QUOTE(city homes @ Mar 8 2017, 01:34 PM) in 4 yr's to come, 2021 when property is delivered, it will be open to so many choices for the incoming propective tenants to decide.. they will have Rica, Titiwangsa Sentral, Bistari, all with LRT connections ... Rental and those bought for investment - condo's with problem Lifts will probably will be affected, they cant sell to fetch a good price or rent a good price as other condo's will fare better, Lift is really a big issue. Being in connectivity but the Jamm starts at the Lift Lobby every day and end of day or waiting at lift near carpark floors... it can be disaster. It is not a perfect property. Otherwise it will not be priced at rm600psf+ where now in sih beh far land already selling at this price range. My argument is.. MKH being seasoned developer they should already aware the shortcomings and think of some mitigation solution. By splitting the lift to both ends just make it worse. You need to know your end game and big picture in every investment. This post has been edited by gks: Mar 8 2017, 01:39 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
gks
|
Mar 8 2017, 01:58 PM
|
|
QUOTE(The Jedi @ Mar 8 2017, 01:55 PM) heard building plan is in process and guess to late to change the lift plan I think the alternative option of splitting the lifts to low and high zones is more feasible Yes this can be way but kinda of wasted as you will have two cargo lifts (in 2+1 configuration for both low and high zone) rather than IF in 5+1 configuration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gks
|
Mar 9 2017, 02:02 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Babizz @ Mar 9 2017, 06:58 AM) Friend used to stay in TS and said that apart from all the bangla foreigner in the apartment due to excellent bus connectivity, the whole place has no fnb so it's very inconvenient even if u were to drive out in the vicinity. Shops below apartment here is welcome. Your friend must be just staying for 3 minute only I think. The residents in TS 99% are non banglas. Even the foreigners are consists of many nationalities including British and Australian. And this is the first time I heard ppl complaint it is inconvenience for F&B in TS. Unless your friend is looking for Wagyu to eat every day. Even KFC is a walking distance away. This post has been edited by gks: Mar 9 2017, 02:03 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
gks
|
Mar 9 2017, 02:08 PM
|
|
QUOTE(The Jedi @ Mar 9 2017, 02:05 PM) haha....there are many landed shops outside TS to offer f&b many TR buyers are TS owners....  Many buyers taste the honey.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gks
|
Mar 9 2017, 02:13 PM
|
|
When some development in sbf land like pahsang like Trio, Lead and Adria also selling RM600psf-ish... u know this is real gem smacked right in the city with TOD. Of course.. some nitty gritty details but that didn't stop the value..
|
|
|
|
|
|
gks
|
Mar 14 2017, 09:08 AM
|
|
QUOTE(why.key @ Mar 13 2017, 08:20 PM) Which 1 is better compare with Rica? It depends on what you value more. Strictly location... TR wins hands down. Smacked right in the city centre with TOD and potential spillover from Tamansarie for RM500K++ exposure. Then again when you review the overall package... That is where you see how they can price it so attractive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gks
|
Mar 31 2017, 01:37 PM
|
|
QUOTE(bearbear @ Mar 31 2017, 12:47 PM) pm me if you can access to 750sq ft units  Even the corner 750sqft also habis?
|
|
|
|
|
|
gks
|
Mar 31 2017, 02:28 PM
|
|
IMO, the one bedroom 635sqft should be a good selection given scarcity of supply with exception of Vue Residence.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gks
|
Apr 4 2017, 07:02 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Fighterken @ Apr 4 2017, 04:46 PM) Nice advertisement. Left 710 & 850 units only. Btw... TR Got rooftop pool?
|
|
|
|
|
|
gks
|
Apr 10 2017, 03:55 PM
|
|
In all the fairness.. Titiwangsa Sentral was priced very cheap and has its bull run from 2012-2014... IMO the appreciation has somehow slowly despite still the signification subsale interest... ie the limit subsale purchaser willing to pay. Another condo.. Vue Residence probably a better comparison than TS... Was launched for about RM450k for 737sqft 2 bedrooms... Now asking about RM600-620K. From Brickz record... RM550K for 726sqft transacted in Aug.2016 http://www.brickz.my/transactions/resident...ces/non-landed/ When MRT2 completed... IMO another catalyst. That's why you see so many people get quite excited... This post has been edited by gks: Apr 10 2017, 03:57 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
gks
|
Apr 10 2017, 04:07 PM
|
|
QUOTE(TokCoc @ Apr 10 2017, 02:48 PM) What do u think about titiwangsa sentral? Freehold,1100sf,600k.. If you can get at such price level.. not bad... as long as not directly facing the shoplots.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gks
|
Apr 11 2017, 06:09 PM
|
|
You buy because of location and the price. Simple as that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gks
|
Apr 11 2017, 11:36 PM
|
|
QUOTE(BEANCOUNTER @ Apr 11 2017, 10:49 PM) It got nothing to do with me. It depends on how mucb developer is willing to pay its architect and how well known is the architect...... And most time or not.....good architecture design cost more money. Basically developer 1. Medium cost apartment facade to reduce construction cost 2. Cut the number of the lifts 3. Super high density of units - 400units/acre In exchange of superior PSF and location. And I will not be surprise if TR comes with inferior structural design with awkward beam placing on ceiling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gks
|
Apr 11 2017, 11:58 PM
|
|
QUOTE(mthc @ Apr 11 2017, 11:41 PM) Chill la. MKH is not a first time developer. Worry about what u invested in rica if you are uncertain about developer track record.  Who knows who will be overly surprise in 5 years time right? Haha And i am referring to the TR the facade and the feature. It can be developed by Sime Darby and Ecoworld and i will still give the same comment if the product, pricing and location still remain exactly the same. Btw... i am talking about TR. What is the relationship with Rica?
|
|
|
|
|
|
gks
|
Apr 13 2017, 09:16 AM
|
|
QUOTE(nda1219 @ Apr 13 2017, 07:35 AM) City center land is scare and we see much higher density development. This will be common norm especially Transit Oriented Development. Few example : 1.Sky Suites @ KLCC comprises of 986 units in three 62-storey service apartments (Tower A, B and C), one 43-storey block (Tower D) of 200-unit serviced residences in 2.5 acres land. 474 units/acre. 2.Riveria KL sentral - 3 blocks 2,182 units. 474 units/acre 3.Desa Green by UOA. 3 blocks 35 storeys 1388 units. 462 units/acre 4. Isola KLCC by OCR Land - 4 blocks 51, 55, 60 and 53 storeys (Tentatively) with 0.37 acres land only. Could be just first block. If want lower density, then can consider Kajang, Semenyih or Setia Alam condo.  I am not disagreeing with your finding. But two wrongs don't make a right. Also doesn't mean if other development is high density, it is ok for TR as well. When you quote Sky Suites, do you aware that each block with approximately 320 units has 4 lifts. How many lifts again for TR with 640 units?  Even Isola with 140 units, they are provided with 3 lifts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gks
|
Apr 13 2017, 09:20 AM
|
|
QUOTE(nda1219 @ Apr 13 2017, 08:05 AM) Not your cup of tea. Some people prefer practical MKH (Toyota) over SimeDarby/EcoWorld ( BMW alike) with good fascade design. Let's see the end product cos Saville workmanship and well balanced price is acceptable for me. BMW property will cost you RM1100psf in this location. How you come to conclusion it is not my cup of tea? If I am not interested in the project, wouldn't waste time to posting here...
|
|
|
|
|
|
gks
|
Apr 26 2017, 04:28 PM
|
|
QUOTE(ondec @ Apr 26 2017, 04:21 PM) btw anybody know if the existing foodstall is going to be demolished to build TR? or the foodstall is not part of the TR's land.. [attachmentid=8766589] I believe already demolished. do not take my words and you can go to visit the site to verify it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gks
|
May 6 2017, 09:05 PM
|
|
QUOTE(propertybbb @ May 6 2017, 08:08 PM) aiyo...all talk about rebate here...bank would lower the ltv le if rebate is too "obvious"...  H*B already cut.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gks
|
May 8 2017, 09:49 AM
|
|
QUOTE(BEANCOUNTER @ May 8 2017, 09:22 AM) there must be reasons why such 'good location' with 3 lines but developer still sell cheap...... they are not here to do charity..... Question BC... on paper do you think TR is better product than TS? which literally just 50m away. Bear in mind Monoland was selling TS for RM250psf about 8 years ago. Usually developer will propose to build better product than subsale around the area to justify higher selling price, apart the new factor. This post has been edited by gks: May 8 2017, 09:50 AM
|
|
|
|
|