Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Fund Investment Corner, Please share anything about Fund.

views
     
kingkong81
post Oct 19 2007, 10:43 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


QUOTE(Lover @ Oct 19 2007, 03:04 AM)
means if i saw some return from my UT.. den if i 1 to sell it i can oways do so? o i hv to wait for prospective buyers?
*
QUOTE(David83 @ Oct 19 2007, 06:15 AM)
No need to wait. You can sell (repurchase) at any time.
*
in Unit Trust, Fund Manager will always b ready buyer. You sell they must buy.

But u hv to wait minimum 10 days to get back your money (at least this is PM policy). Mutual Gold, business 2 days only
kingkong81
post Oct 19 2007, 10:55 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


QUOTE(David83 @ Oct 19 2007, 10:51 AM)
Repurchase carries the same meaning right?
*
redemption (by unitholders) = repurchase (by FM?) = sell (more laymen term/stocks term) sweat.gif
kingkong81
post Oct 19 2007, 03:41 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


QUOTE(chidori_nep @ Oct 19 2007, 02:43 PM)
Hihi....I got a noobie question, hope anyone here could enlighten me  icon_question.gif

Normally when u guys wanna lock in profit by switching from an equity to bond/MM fund, do u guys
1) take out ALL ur units into the new fund OR
2) juz take out the capital and leave behind the profits OR
3) take out everything leaving behind 1000units or RM1k NAV inside to maintain average unit cost (another question...what is average unit cost in this context?  rclxub.gif )

What are the pro & cons of each move?
And how about the other way round when ya switch back from bond/MM-->equity fund? Which option is the best?

Hope someone could teach me abit....wanna learn.....thanks!!!!  wub.gif
*
NO. 1
Usually, when you do switch all your units into a new fund is when the fund is not performing up to your expectation. Therefore, you switch to other funds that has more potential.

Full switching may oso be done (to bond/mmf) when the market is down to preserve your capital. and will switch back into equity once the market is more stable.

NO. 2
This kind of switching is what we call profit taking. Once your fund perform to a certain target that u set, then you switch out some of your units to lock-in your profit. (i.e. take out your capital and leave your profit in there)

NO. 3
Mayb by leaving some low-cost units in your fund, when you buy in the fund again, it can helps to lower your cost per units.
Average cost means your average NAV cost/unit (include service charges +/- switching fees). Anyhting above this value is your profit.

as usual, do always take into the account of RM25 switching fees that is imposed as this will be included into your unit cost.

Pro and Cons?? If you switch too many times, in the end, you incur more loss than profit. Switching do save you the service charges for reentering the market. It oso useful in doing your asset allocation.

I would say, determine why you want to switch and when to switch.
not performing? preserve capital? market drop? profit taking?

This post has been edited by kingkong81: Oct 19 2007, 03:47 PM
kingkong81
post Oct 19 2007, 07:38 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


QUOTE(chidori_nep @ Oct 19 2007, 05:47 PM)
haha sorry i'm abit confused with these few statements...

so no. 1 full switching is done when market is going down to preserve capital, while no. 2 profit taking is when there's nothing wrong with the market but u juz wanna take out the profit because u hav reached ur own target issit?  hmm.gif
yep

QUOTE
ic ic.......but wouldn't performing a full switching after the fund has reached ur target be better than leaving behind a small sum of profit behind? Is there any advantage in leaving behind the profit? Wouldn't any future switching incur more costs due to the small sum? Let's say if after u take out the capital the market collapses, wouldn't the profit left behind shrink unless another switching is performed, which would cost another RM25?  blink.gif  (esp for small time investors like me, that's a lot in percentage biggrin.gif )
Profit taking can mean 2 things
1st...u take out all
2nd...u take back your capital...left your profit there to grow some more. So if losses occurs, it is on ur profit, coz u ady take back your capital, so u wont feel the pain. If it grows higher...better, coz ur 'profit' are making more 'profit'.

Swicthing fees (PMutual) are based on number of transaction made, not based on your units. Everytime time you switch, RM25 transaction fees r needed. (there are few exceptions, pls look back a few pages where i hv posted the fees of switching)

QUOTE
No. 3 dun understand haha icon_question.gif how can leaving sum units in the fund lower my cost per units when I buy back? especially when I'm only switching between funds...no service charge other than RM25 (assuming it's PM) blink.gif wouldn't buying more units at a go after a full switching have the same cost per units as leaving some in the fund then switching back into the same fund with the same amount of money?  rclxub.gif  rclxub.gif  rclxub.gif

sorry ar I abit slow in understanding rclxub.gif  thanks for ur lengthy reply~ wub.gif
*
(a)
ok...let say initially u bought your fund at RM0.25/unit. assume you put in RM10, 000
No. of units = Rm10k / 0.25 = 40000units

(b)
Your units price shoot up until RM0.30/unit....then market starts to go down, u manage to switch 35,000 units out at the price of RM0.30.

( c)
So, units left in account is 5000 units (with cost price of 25 cents each)

(d)
Price drop until 0.27...then u switch in to buy back. Let say u only switch in RM5000
no of units = Rm5000 / 0.27 = 18518.5 units

(e) Total units you have = 5000 units (previous) + 18518.5 units (new switch in) = 23,518.5 units

Total capital pumped in = (5000 units X RM0.25) + RM5000 = RM6250

Average cost per unit = RM6250 / 23, 518.5 units = RM 0.2657/units

--------
If u switched out all...then buy back in at 0.27...your cost price will be 0.27/units lor.
So, it does helps to average down cost/unit if your initial buy is at low price.

Keep in mind that this is just simple calculation, I did not includes service charges & switching fees into the calculation.

-----------------------

If anyone have better and easier way to explain this please share with us wink.gif

This post has been edited by kingkong81: Oct 19 2007, 07:40 PM
kingkong81
post Oct 20 2007, 12:18 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


QUOTE(chidori_nep @ Oct 19 2007, 08:32 PM)
Sorry sorry, another question...(the last i promise >.< ya muz feel tat i very fan now >.< )
In this case, average unit cost is reduced. may i know what are the pros for lower average unit cost? (sorry another noobie question >.<) Coz if I act according to the 2nd scenario (switch all out & buy back at 0.27), wouldn't i earn more and have more units in my hands even if the average unit cost is higher?

QUOTE
Scenario 1
Starting modal= RM10,000
Initial fund price= RM0.25/unit
Initial no of units=10k/0.25=40,000units

NAV increase to 0.30, switched 35,000 units out=RM 10,500 at hand
5000 units left, price drop to 0.27= RM 1350

So my nett assets worth will be Rm10,500 + RM 1350= RM11850

Let's say I switch back in RM5000 at 0.27= 18518.5 units
with RM5500 left in hand.

So total I got 18518.5 + 5000 (previous) = 23,518.5 units plus RM5500 left in hand
Average cost per unit = [(5000 x RM0.25) + RM5000]/ 23,518.5 = RM 0.2657/unit
Scenario 2
Starting modal= RM10,000
Initial fund price= RM0.25/unit
Initial no of units=10k/0.25=40,000units

NAV increase to 0.30, switched 40,000 units out=RM 12,000 at hand (nett assets worth)
0 units left

price drops to 0.27

Let's say I switch back in RM6500 at 0.27= 24074.1 units
with RM5500 left in hand.

So total I got 24074.1 units plus RM 5500 left in hand
Average cost per unit = RM 0.27/unit
Can count like that ka? biggrin.gif haha....I simply count according to my logic, dunno correct or not~ Pls tell mi if i count wrongly >.< (me study science one, dunno how to do accounting at all cry.gif )

So assuming my twisted logic ( tongue.gif ) is correct, in scenario 2 even though the average unit cost is higher, but in the end the nett assets is worth more (RM12k agaisnt RM11850) and the no of units also more (24074.1 units agaisnt 23,518.5 units). Would it be more profitable to follow scenario 2? blink.gif blink.gif blink.gif or is there any special reason for lowering average unit cost? blink.gif blink.gif blink.gif

arigatou~~~ notworthy.gif
*
Have you heard of buy Low sell High??? The concept is almost the same, we try to buy at low price (accumulate more units at lower price), i.e. and try to lower our cost per unit as much as possible, so when the price go up, our profit margin will be high.

I would not say you are totally wrong in your calculation...it you are considering the total net worth of your cash + investment mayb you have a point there.

But, what we are looking at is not the money/net worth at that time only...we aim at gaining more in longer term

you see...in scenario 1, your average cost price is at 0.2657...Scenario 2, avg cost price is 0.27

then consider this scenario...after switching in back at 0.27, the market soar, and the price go up to RM0.35/unit

wat is the simple return for scenario 1 and 2?

Scenario 1 = [(0.35-0.2657)/0.2657 ] x 100%= 31.73%

Scenario 2 = [(0.35-0.27)/0.27 ] x 100%= 29.63%

Difference = 2.1%

so, u see the difference? so, scenario 1 will be more profitable than scenario 2

then again, these are juz examples, remember u hv to take into account of service charge & switching fees
kingkong81
post Oct 20 2007, 11:21 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


QUOTE(chidori_nep @ Oct 20 2007, 03:08 PM)
Yatta~ Suddenly I get what u mean....thanks a lot!!! U're really helpful de  wub.gif

In scenario 2, i think u actually earn more in terms of total nett worth than scenario 1 IF THE MARKET SOARS ..although if count percentage scenario 1 seems more profitable, but this is only taking into account the 2nd round of buying/selling.... In scenario 2, I end up with more units, so if market soars, i earn more in the end compared to scenario 1 (in ratio to the initial capital invested).

But if market drops & i dun manage to pull out my capital in time, I will lose more in scenario 2 than scenario 1.

So leaving behind some units to lower average cost price is to reduce my risk...lower risk means less returns too.

Correct kah if I understand it this way sifu?  tongue.gif

(PS: U own the Ignis Max Factory ver. in ur signature kah?!?!?!  shocking.gif  shocking.gif  shocking.gif  WOW!!! That's the best ver!!!! I want~~~~ cry.gif  cry.gif  cry.gif Could only afford the Alter ver....not so nice.....sobs.... cry.gif  cry.gif  cry.gif )

*
You are learning fast biggrin.gif

To me, leaving some low-priced (low-cost) units behind is more to lower my average cost during 2nd buy in...this is in order to maximize my return when the markets rebound. The risk is still there, if market continues to drop lower than my cost price, the units left behind are actually making losses now...so, it is still a bit risky.

So, both methods have its pro & cons...depends on which you prefer more...smile.gif

There still lots of things to learn...i'm still learning everyday as well... nod.gif

(P/S: Yep...Max Fact Ignis is the first PVC figurine that i bought...really a nice figurine. Adding Yamato Non-non to my collection soon... wink.gif )
kingkong81
post Oct 24 2007, 02:37 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


QUOTE(KiliKulu @ Oct 24 2007, 01:03 PM)
i still not quite understand after i read the paper, if account 1 got 50k, how much is allowed to withdrawl for UT investment?
*
Under the current EPF requirement for Unit Trust Investment:

20% of the excess amount of RM50k in your Account 1,

i.e. if your Account 1 got 100K, amount u can take to invest is (100k-50k)X20% = RM10k nod.gif

withdrawal can only be done every 3months

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The recent paper announcement oso make me blur ady...minimum 9k in Account 1????????

This post has been edited by kingkong81: Oct 24 2007, 02:40 PM
kingkong81
post Oct 24 2007, 10:06 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


QUOTE(InvisibleShark @ Oct 24 2007, 05:17 PM)
Hi there ,im looking to buy some unit trust any idea which fund is good buy for long term investment ???
*
Well Unit Trust Fund for one is aim for medium to long-term investment. So mayb you should get to know wat is your goal and how much risk to take before hand.

To me, for really long...long term investment, where u wan to keep until old 1, high risk fund will b an option. For long-term capital growth...else, a moderate-risk, Income fund is oso a good one...which 1? then u hv to hv a look lor.
kingkong81
post Oct 25 2007, 10:02 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


QUOTE(bengang13 @ Oct 25 2007, 07:13 PM)
My UT Agent sent me an article on it...if gusy want i can pose it online..here are the snippet

user posted image
*
Thats interesting...now almost everyone can invest with their EPF money liao!
kingkong81
post Oct 26 2007, 09:18 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


QUOTE(b00n @ Oct 25 2007, 10:35 PM)
Yeap basically next year onwards I would get my account 2 for paying off my housing loans. (first withdrawal) than large portion of my EPF is going into unit trust mainly PM series.
Wonder would EPF reopen the choice of investing in foreign funds.
*
Limiting local funds really narrow down the option and make EPF money to invest in UT less attractive.

Hope EPF will relax the rule a bit
kingkong81
post Oct 28 2007, 09:03 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


QUOTE(Jordy @ Oct 28 2007, 02:21 PM)
Even so, I think not all local funds are approved..
That is the disadvantage of EPF investment..
*
Yup...it makes the EPF investment look less attractive, with juz a handful of fund to choose from.
kingkong81
post Oct 29 2007, 08:21 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


QUOTE(bengang13 @ Oct 28 2007, 09:47 PM)
Anybody knows which UT is allowed?
*
For PM....

PIX, PRSF, PIDF, PIBF, PSBF, PMMF, PIMMF
kingkong81
post Nov 6 2007, 12:43 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


QUOTE(hackwire @ Nov 5 2007, 08:49 PM)
a friend told me to invest in PM and its better to park my money here rather than putting in EPF because of low interest rate.

I told him that im not interested if my principal can shrink. according to him , my principal is safe meaning if i deposit rm 10K , after 5 years i can still withdraw out 10K with high interest rate. is that so?

is this a bullet-proof investment just as EPF ?
*
QUOTE(hackwire @ Nov 5 2007, 09:04 PM)
thanks buddy, i will have a look at it, for the mean time i still stick with EPF until something is 30-50 percent better than it.
*
Nothing is 100% guaranteed.

If you are seeking something that can give you 30-50% return, the thing you can do, is to invest in a higher return investment instruments, be it Unit Trust, Shares, Property, etc.

You have to take the risk in order to gain the return. Even those capital-protection scheme/funds/investment have their risk. Imagine, your money is stuck there for 5 years and in the end, they tell you u r earning nothing. So this is the risk.

Putting your money in EPF or FD is safe, but its return is low, may not even able to offset the inflation.

So, investment is not about how much you want to get in profit. It is more to how much risk you can take in order to get the profit you wanted. If we know wat risk we are taking in wat type of investment, we are taking more to a calculated risk.

The choice is still yours.
Save in EPF with low returns but very low risk, or invest your money, take the risk, get the chance to earn more.
As long as you are comfortable with wat you do with your money

smile.gif


Added on November 6, 2007, 12:51 amInformation with regards to 2 NEW PUBLIC MUTUAL funds,

1) Public Sector Select Fund (PSSF)

2) Public Islamic Sector Select Fund (PISSF)


Launching on 13 November 2007 with issue price/NAV is at RM0.25 per unit during offer period (13 Nov ~ 3rd Dec, 2007).
In addition, promotional service charge of 5.45% of NAV per unit during offer period!.
Limited fund size of only RM 100Million for each of both funds.
Eligible for EPF investment as well!

Fund objective:
To achieve long term capital growth over the medium to long term period by identifying & investing in market sectors with strong earnings growth prospects & attractive valuations.

Investment Policy
Equity Exposure: Generally range from 75% to 90% of its NAV
Will invest in maximum of 6 sectors while will maintain investment in a minimum of 3 sectors.


Investors' Profile
o Aggressive risk-reward temperament
o Medium to long-term investor
o Can withstand extended periods of market highs and lows in pursuit of capital growth

Distribution policy
o Incidental

This post has been edited by kingkong81: Nov 6 2007, 12:51 AM
kingkong81
post Nov 6 2007, 03:09 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


QUOTE(coolgo @ Nov 6 2007, 12:52 PM)
i'm interest with these 2 fund, but must invest via EPF?
*
Open for both Cash & EPF
kingkong81
post Nov 7 2007, 08:47 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


QUOTE(howszat @ Nov 7 2007, 01:56 AM)
Why has Public Mutual got so many funds with similar Investor Profiles?

Anything different (from existing funds) about these 2 new ones?
*
This is only the 2nd time Public Mutual came out with a sectorial fund.

The 1st one is Public Regional Sector Fund (PRSEC) launched 1.5 yrs ago. It invest in regional market.

The 2 new ones (PISSF, PSSF) are oso sectorial fund, but it will be domestic fund (i.e. Malaysia market only) and bcoz of this, it is eligible for EPF investment. Basically this new funds mainly target at giving EPF investor some new choices after KWSP implement the new ruling on investment using EPF $$.
The difference between the two, one is conventional fund (PSSF), the other is Islamic fund (PISSF), but both have similar investment strategy.

Hope this helps smile.gif
kingkong81
post Nov 7 2007, 11:17 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


QUOTE(Jordy @ Nov 7 2007, 10:57 AM)
A little bit I would add on to this statement.
The Cash and EPF option is only available during the First Day of launching.
If these funds are approved by EPF, then the subsequent days will be EPF Only.
Please take note on this smile.gif
*
Latest news.

Both new funds PISSF & PSSF have been APRROVED BY EPF. Therefore, as Jordy said, for cash investment, the first of of launching is the day u can purchase...coz if response is overwhelming, subsequent day will only for EPF
kingkong81
post Nov 7 2007, 06:39 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


QUOTE(howszat @ Nov 7 2007, 02:10 PM)
1. Let's say I'm looking for a PM fund where the manager has great flexibility in shifting the weighting between equity and fix-income depending on market conditions, which ones should I start reading on?

2. Is the Public China Select Fund too high to be buying into at this time? Just looking for general comments.
*
No.1
You should be looking at Balanced Funds then. Balanced fund profile usually is 60% in Equity & 40% in fixed income securities. The fund manager, depends on market condition, can shift the investment in between the equity & fixed income securities part.

eg. PIABF, PFEBF


No.2
The price seems to be too high for me to go in. But i do believe that PCSF can still go more than RM0.30/unit. So, do u wan to take the risk? smile.gif
kingkong81
post Nov 15 2007, 02:23 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


Latest News Update from PUBLIC MUTUAL


PIBF Fund size increased from 2 billion units to 3 billion units

smile.gif


Added on November 16, 2007, 3:33 pmClosure of Public Sector Select Fund and Public Islamic Sector Select Fund

Please be informed that Public Sector Select Fund (PSSF) and Public Islamic Sector Select Fund (PISSF) will be closed for all sales with effect from 16 November 2007.

This post has been edited by kingkong81: Nov 16 2007, 03:33 PM
kingkong81
post Nov 16 2007, 10:42 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


QUOTE(David83 @ Nov 16 2007, 09:10 PM)
How come it's closed so fast? Got problem or fully sold? The launch date is 13 November.
*
The fund size for both funds are only 100 million each, very small only...it has been informed that this fund will sold out fast, and it did. And in actual fact, cash investment is only accepted on the 1st day, 2nd & 3rd day for EPF only.

HOT!!

For the time being, there is no news that the fund size will be increased. rolleyes.gif
kingkong81
post Nov 16 2007, 10:55 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,351 posts

Joined: Mar 2006
From: KL/S'gor


QUOTE(David83 @ Nov 16 2007, 10:45 PM)
However, why no accounment is being made in PM website?

They're still putting the offer period from 13 November 2007 - 3 December 2007.
*
It was informed to all agents...no public announcement being made yet...

So lets see what is PM next plan for this fund.

Fund closure on the 1st day offer has happened before...Focus Select Fund is one example. Sold on the morning of the 1st launching day.... nod.gif

This post has been edited by kingkong81: Nov 16 2007, 10:55 PM

7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 5 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0212sec    0.37    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 10:47 AM