Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Kia Cerato 2015, 1.6 SX vs 2.0 L

views
     
SUSjdgobio
post Aug 10 2015, 05:31 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
Cerato 1.6 is probably the most powerful NA 1.6 litre car in Msia. It doesn't feel underpowered until you reach a certain speed of course.

The 2.0 is obviously more powerful but if you feel the 1.6 is underpowered, maybe you're not driving it right or your expectation is too high.

The differences between the 2 are not worth 20k IMO. But clearly, if you need the power and do a lot of long highway journeys, the 2.0 will be a better choice.
SUSjdgobio
post Aug 11 2015, 09:17 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(Balanced @ Aug 10 2015, 09:54 PM)
Have you tried a toyota 4AGE engine or a VTEC B16A or B16B engine? Above 165hp stock.

You will surprised if you think cerato 1.6 is the most powerful NA 1.6 litre car.
*
Sorry for my ignorance sir. Pls enlighten me which new cars have these engines so that I can go for a test drive.

I hope you are not talking about ancient cars which can only be bought 2nd hand since this is not the topic being discussed currently. Perhaps I should have added more caveats to what I said, but I do believe its correct in the context of the current discussion. icon_rolleyes.gif

As far as I know, both Honda & Toyota don't sell 1.6 cars in Msia currently. I would be happy to stand corrected. notworthy.gif



This post has been edited by jdgobio: Aug 11 2015, 09:22 AM
SUSjdgobio
post Aug 11 2015, 11:57 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(dares @ Aug 11 2015, 10:37 AM)
If I put the Cerato 1.6l in a scania truck, it is still a powerful 1.6l, but can it haul container trailers?

Consider the application, not just paper figures.
*
Don't be a dumbfuck. I said most powerful 1.6L car not engine. The application is to drive the car. Taking out the engine to put in a truck and saying that it's underpowered is not the intended application.

My conclusion is based on actual application not paper figures. But your rhetoric is really idiotic.


SUSjdgobio
post Aug 11 2015, 12:48 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,010 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
QUOTE(dares @ Aug 11 2015, 12:27 PM)
Try to educate yourself what is power-to-weight ratio before calling people names mmkay? Because apparently you did not understand what I mean by "consider the application"

Calling the Cerato the most power 1.6l new car currently on the market makes me laugh.
*
I am well aware of power-to-wait ratios. Your statement is still dumb and out of context. Did the TS say he wants to take out the Cerato's engine and put it in his Scania truck? Or do you seriously think that the Cerato is too big a car for a 1.6L engine? If you think so, you are making a wrong assumption.

Pls enlighten me then on what 1.6L car is more powerful than the Cerato in the same segment? I would be happy to stand corrected. Context here is very important. I am talking about the car as it is against other cars available in the same segment.

Apologies if my earlier comment sounded harsh, but the absurdity of what you said in the context of this discussion is really phenomenal.

 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0205sec    0.64    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 03:21 AM