QUOTE(alvin aka gHostoNg @ Jul 23 2015, 11:11 PM)
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/01/27/opinion/...oking.html?_r=0
In the study, the Portland State scientists ran the device at both a low voltage and a high voltage. At the low voltage, they did not detect formaldehyde. But at the high voltage, they found some. Formaldehyde is, indeed, a known carcinogen, which also exists, among hundreds of other toxic chemicals and dozens of cancer-causing agents, in combustible cigarettes. The authors concluded that someone who was a heavy user of a vaporizer at the high voltage was five to 15 times more likely to get cancer than a longtime smoker.
Aye. But this test was one using silica wick which is, unless you're using a clearomizer like C4 and such, no 'known' dangers of formaldehyde there. Didn't even bother to jolt down their setup smh In the study, the Portland State scientists ran the device at both a low voltage and a high voltage. At the low voltage, they did not detect formaldehyde. But at the high voltage, they found some. Formaldehyde is, indeed, a known carcinogen, which also exists, among hundreds of other toxic chemicals and dozens of cancer-causing agents, in combustible cigarettes. The authors concluded that someone who was a heavy user of a vaporizer at the high voltage was five to 15 times more likely to get cancer than a longtime smoker.
Wait.. I didn't saw any subscription notice in the survey lvl5ballz. Was it the one about the discount or the mystery juice?
Jul 23 2015, 11:55 PM

Quote

0.0268sec
0.95
7 queries
GZIP Disabled