QUOTE(samsungfreak @ Jul 25 2016, 06:03 PM)
The full story is that now pro or low end is no longer represented by GX/GH vs G/GM/GF, but the number of digits, exactly like Canon and Nikon (which allows Canon and Nikon users to immediately make sense of the system). So a
GX9000, which will be a "GF9", will not have an EVF.So single digit cameras sure has EVF, 4 digit cameras probably don't have EVF.
It is very obvious that GF series doesn't make much money to them as compared to GH and GX. The new GX80/85 is surprisingly quite a success, maybe due to its stabilized 4k video at a very compact size. Panasonic is doing more marketing work for this camera esp in the Europe, you can see a lot more reviews on this camera than previous models.
Nothing is ditched and more choices will be available with new naming system. For example it is now possible to have a high end G camera, a G8, exactly a high end "GX8" with features such as huge EVF, weather-sealed and dual-IS but in SLR form factor. I will love that camera as I always hate to pay a premium price for the video features in the GH lineup which I never use. I have previously shoot with GH3 and GH4. So G series can now have at least 2 cameras G8 and maybe G800 (to replace the G7, no IBIS, no weather sealing). GX900 and GX9000 can be added to replace GM5 and GF8.
I can see of 7 different cameras (GX x4, G x2, GH x1). The new naming allows more flexibility. Nikon only needs one D series. It doesn't even need to use "mark II" or "mark IV".
I understand the new naming lah and I would argue there would not be a "GF9" equivalent under the new scheme.
Current systemGH - Video-centric.
G - SLR form factor.
GX - RF form factor
GM - Smallest possible form factor. Premium body.
GF - Entry level
Back in 2009 thereabout, Panny's original lineup consist of no entry level model. Remember that even the GF1 was enthusiast orientated and full metal body.
Then Olympus came out with the super cost-down E-PL1 and Panasonic's response was to dumb down the GF series... and there was the time where Panasonic and Sony was racing to the bottom spamming models of GF's and NEX every few months.
Someone must've noticed their bottom line to make them launch the GX... GX1 being aimed at the enthusiast where the GF1 left off.
Panny tried again with the GM1 and GM5... using premium metal body and claiming smallest ILC in the world (previously used to market the GF) but GM1 was a mess due to overlapping feature set with the GF while the GM5 ended up in a higher price point than it could support.
Your GF9 being a GX9000 wouldve been fine when the ILC market was hot... and to fight market shares.
But Sony no longer pumping out cheap NEXs, Olympus dumped the entry level so IMHO, it doesn't sense for Panny to kill the GF "brand" and then continue the same money bleeding formula to dilute the GX "brand" that were created to fix the former anyways.
Surely there'll be a more entry version of the GX85 but I'm afraid it won't be "entry" like the GF.
This post has been edited by sniper on the roof: Jul 26 2016, 10:31 AM