QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Jul 24 2016, 11:45 PM)
I do not think so.
From the definition, G, GX and GH all looks like it will have EVF. EVF cost money... see the price difference between the GM1 and GM5.
Also it doesn't make sense to dump the GF moniker as the "Girl Friend" is a known entity among the consumers unless they're exiting that market segment.
The same segment that is being killed by smartphones, RX100's and Canon GX's. The same segment that's being abandoned by Panny's competitors too.
The full story is that now pro or low end is no longer represented by GX/GH vs G/GM/GF, but the number of digits, exactly like Canon and Nikon (which allows Canon and Nikon users to immediately make sense of the system). So a GX9000, which will be a "GF9", will not have an EVF.
So single digit cameras sure has EVF, 4 digit cameras probably don't have EVF.
It is very obvious that GF series doesn't make much money to them as compared to GH and GX. The new GX80/85 is surprisingly quite a success, maybe due to its stabilized 4k video at a very compact size. Panasonic is doing more marketing work for this camera esp in the Europe, you can see a lot more reviews on this camera than previous models.
Nothing is ditched and more choices will be available with new naming system. For example it is now possible to have a high end G camera, a G8, exactly a high end "GX8" with features such as huge EVF, weather-sealed and dual-IS but in SLR form factor. I will love that camera as I always hate to pay a premium price for the video features in the GH lineup which I never use. I have previously shoot with GH3 and GH4. So G series can now have at least 2 cameras G8 and maybe G800 (to replace the G7, no IBIS, no weather sealing). GX900 and GX9000 can be added to replace GM5 and GF8.
I can see of 7 different cameras (GX x4, G x2, GH x1). The new naming allows more flexibility. Nikon only needs one D series. It doesn't even need to use "mark II" or "mark IV".