QUOTE(S4PH @ Jul 2 2015, 02:25 PM)
Stock 290x Gaming. I'm on Window 10 btw, you currently on Window 7?AMD Radeon™ Discussion V13, Radeon Software 16.5.3, God Speed
AMD Radeon™ Discussion V13, Radeon Software 16.5.3, God Speed
|
|
Jul 2 2015, 03:03 PM
Return to original view | Post
#21
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 3 2015, 12:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#22
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
QUOTE(S4PH @ Jul 2 2015, 07:09 PM) You should hop in A.S.A.P. Any way you can try dropping Catalyst 1040.0 D3D files into pCars root folder to get benefit of driver optimization without installing the driver. Usually it will work. You can download the files in Catalyst DLLs repo here. QUOTE(terradrive @ Jul 3 2015, 12:26 AM) Banyak orang gaduh pasal ini already lol Sos?-snip- Titan X road lines looked to be half transparent, just like on the first image. Is that Alpha channel error? Discounting the black and gray comments, look at the texture. Fury X's road texture looked sharper, the pillar have better shading. Tanks looked sharper on Titan X but textures looked more washed out. |
|
|
Jul 3 2015, 10:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#23
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
QUOTE(terradrive @ Jul 3 2015, 01:08 AM) I wouldn't judge image quality through video especially when the differences is subtle. |
|
|
Jul 3 2015, 04:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#24
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
|
|
|
Jul 3 2015, 09:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#25
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
QUOTE(S4PH @ Jul 3 2015, 06:25 PM) Official Window 10 start rolling end of this month, you can try it for free right now though.QUOTE(chocobo7779 @ Jul 3 2015, 08:17 PM) +1 Need a proper uncompress video/screenshot comparison before i jump into the bandwagon. |
|
|
Jul 3 2015, 10:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#26
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 4 2015, 10:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#27
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
QUOTE(Unseen83 @ Jul 3 2015, 10:18 PM) Pretty stable with some rare hiccups on the UI.With my processor and 15.200.40 driver, i get 920k+ on DX11 ST 890k+ on DX11 MT 11M+ on Mantle 13M+ on DX12 But after upgraded to current build 10163, i only get 3.9k physic score in Firestrike. |
|
|
Jul 4 2015, 11:13 AM
Return to original view | Post
#28
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
QUOTE(terradrive @ Jul 4 2015, 10:39 AM) -snip- "Optimization"Look at the FPS number, 10% hit on Titan X when running at the same image quality settings as Fury X. All benchmarks partaining to Nvidia's cards are questionable now. What setting is this? In NCP or ingame? Is it only happen in BF4? What about 980Ti? |
|
|
Jul 4 2015, 07:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#29
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
QUOTE(TheHitman47 @ Jul 4 2015, 03:00 PM) Sry, too lazy and "busy". Anyway Unseen83, you can unlock Fury X memory overclock by enabling "Extend official overclock limits" in Msi Afterburner. Voltage coming soon, Unwinder already got his hand on Fury X. |
|
|
Jul 6 2015, 10:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#30
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
QUOTE(siles1991 @ Jul 6 2015, 02:00 AM) IINM, Unseen83 currently selling his 290x Vapor-X for RM1k. One of the best non-ref 290x imo.QUOTE(azsace @ Jul 6 2015, 07:23 AM) Well.. would recommend u to get r9 290 (2nd if u on a budget) if u playing on 1080p... u can get it less than rm900 If i recall correctly, he just sold his 7950 so his upgrade path should be at least an R9-290.R9 280x... would not recommend since its quite an old card.. using gcn1.. previously used r9 280x myself |
|
|
Jul 6 2015, 03:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#31
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
|
|
|
Jul 6 2015, 07:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#32
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
|
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 07:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#33
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
QUOTE(khelben @ Jul 7 2015, 06:56 PM) He's just predicting Nobody going to buy that if they price it higher than the Fury X. Ah wells. I thought the nano would be a slightly more affordable Fiji. Based on AMD 2x Performance/Watt and 175watt TDP claim, i expect the R9 Nano will perform similar or slightly better than the R9-290x. Green camp have mini GTX 970 at that form factor and performance range. ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 09:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#34
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
QUOTE(Human10 @ Jul 7 2015, 08:13 PM) But nano is still shorter than 970ITX, also 970 ITX's performance is a little limited compared to full size 970. Marginally shorter. Indeed the performance is slightly lower but it still 290x tier.A price above 290x is still sensible, price it above Fury (or even Fury X) without justification in performance simply wouldn't work. I think will price it similar or slightly lower than GTX 980. QUOTE(terradrive @ Jul 7 2015, 08:18 PM) Damn, that card is faster than my 290x. |
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 10:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#35
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
|
|
|
Jul 7 2015, 10:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#36
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
Meanwhile.. Radeon Fury from Sapphire.
![]() ![]() |
|
|
Jul 8 2015, 11:02 AM
Return to original view | Post
#37
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
QUOTE(kizwan @ Jul 8 2015, 02:27 AM) But but.. i'm on the same if not slightly better driver. QUOTE(shikimori @ Jul 8 2015, 07:22 AM) looks like 980ti SLI still win against fury X crossfire Most website use reference 980 Ti.Though on other website it is showing that both cards are trading blows Inb4 fcat QUOTE(ruffstuff @ Jul 8 2015, 08:19 AM) In before 95c.QUOTE(Human10 @ Jul 8 2015, 08:21 AM) No doubt about that. |
|
|
Jul 8 2015, 11:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#38
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
|
|
|
Jul 8 2015, 12:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#39
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
|
|
|
Jul 9 2015, 05:53 AM
Return to original view | Post
#40
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,612 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Tomorrow |
New WHQL driver! RAWWWRRR!!! Now with VSR and FRTC for GCN 1.0 card and official Window 10 support. Naissa.
Download them at AMD website. http://support.amd.com/en-us/download Included Highlights: Display Driver version 15.20.1046 -Windows® 10 Technical Preview Support -Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) -Frame Rate Target Control™ (FRTC) -Performance Optimizations versus AMD Catalyst™ Omega -AMD FreeSync™ and AMD CrossFire™ Support -AMD CrossFire™ Profile Enhancements for the following games: QUOTE(S4PH @ Jul 9 2015, 01:07 AM) You should aim higher performance bro. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0268sec
0.45
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 28th November 2025 - 08:07 AM |