QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Jun 16 2015, 11:37 AM)
Problem is MRAP-style vehicles have a quite limited niche outside of protecting personnel against IEDs and ambushes. The high cost of maintenance and heavy weight doesn't make them that great in doing all round utility duties. Utility military vehicles like the Humvees and Land Rovers have a lot more to do in the battlefield that don't require it to be enveloped in 5 tons of armor plating; like ferrying supplies and light vehicle transport. These mundane jobs don't exactly need a 10-ton beast that will cost the same as 3-4 basic Humvees.
U forgot to factor in crew confidenceSome former soldier even admit they rather be in those slow vehicles than in a hummer. The old higher cost is no longer an issue
The first mrap was a stop gap solution which does not really care about maintenance or operating cost
But as the vehicles matured, it soon become more economical to operate as the engine and parts are soon standardised. All those new vehicles that you listed some of the selling point is lower operating cost. Of course, it wont be lower than a hummer but at least lower compared to the 1st gen mrap
Any added protection goes a long way at least withstanding an rpg hit
Jun 16 2015, 11:52 AM

Quote











0.0224sec
0.70
7 queries
GZIP Disabled