Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 CIMB-Principal Asia Pacific Dynamic Income Fund, is this good fund to invest?

views
     
night
post Apr 15 2015, 08:56 PM

What doesn't kill you, makes you stronger.
******
Senior Member
1,469 posts

Joined: Sep 2006



QUOTE(Kaka23 @ Apr 15 2015, 08:42 PM)
I notice ocbc personal banker looks better than other banks..  Haha
*
Which branch?
Kaka23
post Apr 15 2015, 08:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,259 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(night @ Apr 15 2015, 09:56 PM)
Which branch?
*
Damansara Utama

nexona88
post Apr 15 2015, 09:58 PM

The Royal Club Member
*********
All Stars
48,566 posts

Joined: Sep 2014
From: REality
QUOTE(Kaka23 @ Apr 15 2015, 08:58 PM)
Damansara Utama
*
u know the name brows.gif
SUSDavid83
post Apr 15 2015, 10:20 PM

20k VIP Club
*********
All Stars
52,874 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Warning: OT
Kaka23
post Apr 16 2015, 06:52 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,259 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(nexona88 @ Apr 15 2015, 10:58 PM)
u know the name  brows.gif
*
Already forgot

eternity4life
post Apr 16 2015, 01:51 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
113 posts

Joined: Nov 2014
From: Kuala Lumpur/Selangor


You should, it's a highly recommended fund in multiple investment seminars I've been through even from independent investment advisors. Not to mention that most fund managers are quite positive with China this year which is one of the main focus market for APDI.

Because of the funds capability of changing from equities, fixed income or money market, it's has better hedging than most funds due to it's flexibility.

Although the target return is 8%, it has outperform the target and consistently provide high returns in the past years. Not to mention that the funds have low volatility relative to it's performance and return. Lower volatility translates to lower risk in investment terms. Hence the reason why it is called Ponzi 2.0.

Nevertheless it is still an equity focused fund which still makes it risky. Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
xuzen
post Apr 16 2015, 02:08 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,436 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(Kaka23 @ Apr 15 2015, 08:42 PM)
I notice ocbc personal banker looks better than other banks..  Haha
*
Good looking person who manages your money are a bad bad combo... too much emo involved. That is why Lee Sook Yee is just an ideal candidate. Matronly, your 40 something average look...

Xuzen
Kaka23
post Apr 16 2015, 03:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,259 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(xuzen @ Apr 16 2015, 03:08 PM)
Good looking person who manages your money are a bad bad combo... too much emo involved. That is why Lee Sook Yee is just an ideal candidate. Matronly, your 40 something average look...

Xuzen
*
shocking.gif
SUSPink Spider
post Apr 16 2015, 03:24 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(xuzen @ Apr 16 2015, 02:08 PM)
Good looking person who manages your money are a bad bad combo... too much emo involved. That is why Lee Sook Yee is just an ideal candidate. Matronly, your 40 something average look...

Xuzen
*
MILF brows.gif
SUSPink Spider
post Apr 16 2015, 03:25 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(eternity4life @ Apr 16 2015, 01:51 PM)
You should, it's a highly recommended fund in multiple investment seminars I've been through even from independent investment advisors. Not to mention that most fund managers are quite positive with China this year which is one of the main focus market for APDI.

Because of the funds capability of changing from equities, fixed income or money market, it's has better hedging than most funds due to it's flexibility.

Although the target return is 8%, it has outperform the target and consistently provide high returns in the past years. Not to mention that the funds have low volatility relative to it's performance and return. Lower volatility translates to lower risk in investment terms. Hence the reason why it is called Ponzi 2.0.

Nevertheless it is still an equity focused fund which still makes it risky. Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
*
Just a nickname tongue.gif
xuzen
post Apr 16 2015, 03:30 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,436 posts

Joined: Oct 2008


QUOTE(eternity4life @ Apr 16 2015, 01:51 PM)
You should, it's a highly recommended fund in multiple investment seminars I've been through even from independent investment advisors. Not to mention that most fund managers are quite positive with China this year which is one of the main focus market for APDI.

Because of the funds capability of changing from equities, fixed income or money market, it's has better hedging than most funds due to it's flexibility.

Although the target return is 8%, it has outperform the target and consistently provide high returns in the past years. Not to mention that the funds have low volatility relative to it's performance and return. Lower volatility translates to lower risk in investment terms. Hence the reason why it is called Ponzi 2.0.

Nevertheless it is still an equity focused fund which still makes it risky. Don't put all your eggs in one basket.
*
Ponzi 1.0 is easier to type compared to Affin Hwang Select Asia Pacific ex Japan Quantum Fund

Ponzi 2.0 is easier to type compared to CIMB-Principle Asia Pacific ex Japan Dynamic Income Fund.

Those fund manager need to be more marketing savvy. Dull boring fund name. Compare that to Vanguard, Spyder, or Spartan. Uber Gen-Y'esque cool name.

Xuzen

This post has been edited by xuzen: Apr 16 2015, 03:36 PM
wil-i-am
post Apr 16 2015, 09:14 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
10,001 posts

Joined: May 2013
Wat is d approved fund size for Ponzi-2?
TSknight
post Apr 18 2015, 01:10 AM

The Truth is Out There..
******
Senior Member
1,842 posts

Joined: Jan 2003



So, now they have good positive return for 3 years. What do you think in future? Will it be same growth?

I don't mind if the NAV does not grow in my case, I just thinking of dividend. Hmm. wonder should I go for it or not.
nexona88
post Apr 18 2015, 12:50 PM

The Royal Club Member
*********
All Stars
48,566 posts

Joined: Sep 2014
From: REality
there's a reason why it's called Ponzi 2.0 whistling.gif
SUSPink Spider
post Apr 18 2015, 01:09 PM

Formerly known as Prince_Hamsap
********
Senior Member
16,872 posts

Joined: Jun 2011


QUOTE(knight @ Apr 18 2015, 01:10 AM)
So, now they have good positive return for 3 years. What do you think in future? Will it be same growth?

I don't mind if the NAV does not grow in my case, I just thinking of dividend. Hmm. wonder should I go for it or not.
*
https://forum.lowyat.net/topic/3509481
Please read Post #1 thoroughly to understand dividend in the context of unit trust
billytong
post Apr 18 2015, 01:53 PM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


what is the worst performance they get? How many years they running already?
SUSDavid83
post Apr 18 2015, 02:01 PM

20k VIP Club
*********
All Stars
52,874 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(billytong @ Apr 18 2015, 01:53 PM)
what is the worst performance they get? How many years they running already?
*
Details: http://www.fundsupermart.com.my/main/fundi...umber=MYCIMB007
nexona88
post Apr 18 2015, 07:57 PM

The Royal Club Member
*********
All Stars
48,566 posts

Joined: Sep 2014
From: REality
QUOTE(billytong @ Apr 18 2015, 01:53 PM)
what is the worst performance they get? How many years they running already?
*
https://my.morningstar.com/ap/quicktake/ove...ceId=0P0000SVIH

icon_rolleyes.gif
Kaka23
post Apr 18 2015, 08:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
8,259 posts

Joined: Sep 2009


QUOTE(billytong @ Apr 18 2015, 02:53 PM)
what is the worst performance they get? How many years they running already?
*
So far cannot complain about the performance... their benchmark is 8%pa, but may not be helpful
billytong
post Apr 19 2015, 05:29 PM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


QUOTE(Kaka23 @ Apr 18 2015, 08:16 PM)
So far cannot complain about the performance... their benchmark is 8%pa, but may not be helpful
*

not very if u are looking for consistency, a few years alone is not enough. Not to mention the economy was going up during 2012-2014.

4 Pages < 1 2 3 4 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.7499sec    0.81    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 06:27 PM