payroll and some stock file..
multiple file will be open at 1 time.
and also publisher..

im try to looking for quad core laptop..

then u no need FHD mostly dual core will.. more core doesnt mean all those core will be useable while we do computing.. excel stuff and lots of  other computing.

For instance, a dual core processor may have base clock speeds of 3.5 GHz for each processor while a quad core processor may only run at 3.0GHz. Just looking at a single core on each of them, the dual core processor will be able to about fourteen percent faster than on the quad core. Thus, if you have a program that is only single threaded, the dual core processor is actually better. Then again, if you have something that can use all four processors such as video transcoding, then the quad core processor will actually be about seventy percent faster than that dual core processor.

For the most part, having a higher core count processor is generally a good thing but it is a very complicated matter. For the most part, a dual core or quad core processor is going to be more than enough power for a basic computer user. The majority of consumers will see no tangible benefits from going beyond four processor cores currently as there is so little software that can take advantage of it.The only people that should consider such high core count processors are those going tasks such as desktop video editing or complicated science and math programs.

then u no need FHD mostly dual core will.. more core doesnt mean all those core will be useable while we do computing.. excel stuff and lots of  other computing.

For instance, a dual core processor may have base clock speeds of 3.5 GHz for each processor while a quad core processor may only run at 3.0GHz. Just looking at a single core on each of them, the dual core processor will be able to about fourteen percent faster than on the quad core. Thus, if you have a program that is only single threaded, the dual core processor is actually better. Then again, if you have something that can use all four processors such as video transcoding, then the quad core processor will actually be about seventy percent faster than that dual core processor.

For the most part, having a higher core count processor is generally a good thing but it is a very complicated matter. For the most part, a dual core or quad core processor is going to be more than enough power for a basic computer user. The majority of consumers will see no tangible benefits from going beyond four processor cores currently as there is so little software that can take advantage of it.The only people that should consider such high core count processors are those going tasks such as desktop video editing or complicated science and math programs.

Then u can look for y400 or y500 wif 4th gen quad core

Or some old stocks 3rd gen

Millions of ringgit involves in calculation? 5th gen no quad core yet

well, I guess his explanation clear my misconception..
I think i just need to pump more ram instead of more core of cpu for multifile loading..

thx for ur suggestion.

well, I guess his explanation clear my misconception..
I think i just need to pump more ram instead of more core of cpu for multifile loading..

thx for ur suggestion.

And SSD if you are loading big file (If you have the fund). It will load your excel files significantly faster. 

Ulv processor not Design for heavy multitasking so if normal multitasking still ok.. n u need a SSD..

I suggest u look for spec like this

i7-4700mq/HQ or i7-3740qm(not sure bout 3630qm)
8GB ram
256SSD
660m above would be enuf

Spend more on SSD better

Forget to mention dual core oso hv M n H Which better for ur work

well, I guess his explanation clear my misconception..
I think i just need to pump more ram instead of more core of cpu for multifile loading..

thx for ur suggestion.

okay..
for SSD,
does it mean that i only can put solely SSD and no HDD?
it will be very costly if solely SSD..

unless it got another slot for me to slot in HDD..

But i guess most 14" laptop don have this support right?

If the laptop have an optical drive. You can use a caddy to add in SSD. If not save up and get one  or Hybrid drives

If the laptop have an optical drive. You can use a caddy to add in SSD. If not save up and get one  or Hybrid drives

If the laptop have an optical drive. You can use a caddy to add in SSD. If not save up and get one  or Hybrid drives

+1  

for hybrid drive..

the ssd part only so small portion..
does it really significantly better than normal hdd??
since 8gb cant even install OS on it & not all application able to fit inside it..

i doubt it will give significant performance improvement.

for hybrid drive..

the ssd part only so small portion..
does it really significantly better than normal hdd??
since 8gb cant even install OS on it & not all application able to fit inside it..

i doubt it will give significant performance improvement.

I agree wif u... coz I hv 32GB msata SSD for cache.. still slow.. the main HDD is using normal 5400rpm...

Get 128SSD if ur budget not enuf for 250

im willing to spend for SSD, but the problem is
if i only can pick either SSD or HDD..
I guess HDD gonna be my choice..

unless there is a laptop provide both SSD and HDD slot for us..
well,
it might be in my wishlist..

There is but mostly m.2 sata drive which is a more expensive form of a SSD.

im willing to spend for SSD, but the problem is
if i only can pick either SSD or HDD..
I guess HDD gonna be my choice..

unless there is a laptop provide both SSD and HDD slot for us..
well,
it might be in my wishlist..

Do like Arthur say.. take out the optical drive then use HDD candy to install ur 1TB HDD.. main use SSD.

oo.. i see  >.<
but performance same?

well,
this is the best solution for current market I guess..