Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V16

views
     
KYPMbangi
post Mar 19 2015, 03:14 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(waja2000 @ Mar 19 2015, 03:13 PM)
Exclusive: Boustead Confirms NSM for the Future Gowind class LCS of the Royal Malaysian Navy

On day 2 of the Langkawi International Maritime & Aerospace exhibition, LIMA 2015, currently held in Malaysia, Navy Recognition met with Anuar Murad, Director of the Defence & Security Division at Boustead Heavy Industries Corporation Berhad (BHIC). During our interview, Mr Anuar gave us the latest update on the program and confirmed Malaysia's intend to procure Kongsberg's Naval Strike Missile (NSM) for its future frigates.

   
“We are now approaching the end of basic design phase two. We have integrated the systems and equipment into the main whole warship design. We have two more combat system equipments that we have not been able to finalize. For the platform systems equipment, we do have all the major ones already in contract and gone through the design review” said Murad Anuar.

Asked about the anti-ship missile capability of the future RMN LCS, Mr Anuar told exclusively to Navy Recognition: “This is one equipment that has been changed as decided by the Government of Malaysia. We have finished the negotiations with Kongsberg Defense Aerospace and we will soon get into contract with Kongsberg for the Naval Strike Missile”.

full report
http://www.navyrecognition.com/index.php?o...sk=view&id=2521

laugh.gif  thumbup.gif
*
fuuu.. giler sedak abeng~ notworthy.gif
KYPMbangi
post Mar 19 2015, 07:21 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(hafizushi @ Mar 19 2015, 07:13 PM)
since no one posted it yet, I will posted here the brief interview with Mr Anuar Director of the Defence & Security Division at Boustead Heavy Industries Corporation Berhad (BHIC) during LIMA 2015
*
Nice video, didnt know the nsm seeker head can rotate like that drool.gif
KYPMbangi
post Mar 19 2015, 09:32 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(thpace @ Mar 19 2015, 09:31 PM)
Rare glimpse into the SU-34 Fullback aka Duck Face

Distinctive because two pilot and navigator sit side by side and not back and front


*
also the only fighter with toilet
KYPMbangi
post Mar 20 2015, 09:03 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


And then there's two blush.gif

user posted image
Prelude penyerahan Helikopter Nuri kepada Tentera Darat Malaysia. (Foto: Rentaka)

[Rentaka FB]

KYPMbangi
post Mar 20 2015, 10:53 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Mar 20 2015, 10:48 AM)
Any significant effect on these Nuris being redeployed to direct army control (PUTD) instead of TUDM?
*
My guess is some of the current air force pilots will temporarily works under the army to train new pilots or maybe transfer terus to army

And the kluang putd base will undergo some upgrade to support these helis
KYPMbangi
post Mar 20 2015, 11:04 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Mar 20 2015, 10:56 AM)
I mean from doctrine and usage POV.

Now free for army to use helicopters anytime perhaps, instead of filling application forms to TUDM everytime want to use helicopters? laugh.gif
*
They can do more of these

user posted image
KYPMbangi
post Mar 20 2015, 11:32 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Mar 20 2015, 11:29 AM)
Err...maybe this has been posted before, but I am too lazy to backtrack on this forum.... rolleyes.gif

How many Nuri helicopters are actually redeployed to PUTD?
*
15 for army
12 for air force
KYPMbangi
post Mar 20 2015, 12:34 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(junchuan @ Mar 20 2015, 11:55 AM)
Wonder how true this is
6 sgpv and 6 new corvettes still not enough?
*
Not enough if you consider that we have 4 major coastal front to secure
And going by optimal operation standard only 1/3 of the ships is on patrol, 1/3 is on standby and last 1/3 is on maintenance
KYPMbangi
post Mar 20 2015, 12:43 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(OvenBaked @ Mar 20 2015, 12:39 PM)
user posted image
*
Looks like it has a lighter color scheme than last time? or is it just the lighting?

Same serial number m45-07
user posted image
KYPMbangi
post Mar 20 2015, 05:43 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Mar 20 2015, 11:35 AM)
Oh, TQVM.  notworthy.gif
*
Sorry terbalik fakta

12 for army
15 for air force
KYPMbangi
post Mar 21 2015, 05:18 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


found green photoshop of the recent nuri digicamo on the net laugh.gif

user posted image


KYPMbangi
post Mar 21 2015, 06:16 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(thpace @ Mar 21 2015, 06:11 PM)
Tat look quite good actually
*
the first time I see this makes my eyes confuse abit, which means it kinda works? rclxub.gif

This post has been edited by KYPMbangi: Mar 21 2015, 06:29 PM
KYPMbangi
post Mar 21 2015, 11:49 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(thpace @ Mar 21 2015, 11:39 PM)
would be good if cost less than half of a new jet which i doubt it will be  hmm.gif
*
their claim (atsc proposal) cites it cost 20% from the projected 6bil-8bil mrca deal
I think we should move away from the migs, its last gen platform anyway and better sell it to others if it really still have some flying hours left
KYPMbangi
post Mar 22 2015, 09:22 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(waja2000 @ Mar 22 2015, 09:20 PM)
ya i know, MPA can't get it soon. wait other few year later。 laugh.gif
*
maybe cuz recently the 4 beechcraft been upgraded with new radar and workstation
KYPMbangi
post Mar 22 2015, 10:41 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(thpace @ Mar 22 2015, 10:36 PM)
still in final discussion, russia at back looming to get india more MKI brows.gif
then MKM why still not a contender for MRCA hmm.gif

any specific reason? or because it optimized for air to air
*
cuz the M in MRCA stands for medium.. mkm is heavy type tongue.gif
KYPMbangi
post Mar 22 2015, 10:46 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(thpace @ Mar 22 2015, 10:43 PM)
M bukan multi role kah?

india is medium lah  laugh.gif
*
lol just joking.. blush.gif

anyway with strained french/nato relation with russia now, really doubt it even be considered
KYPMbangi
post Mar 22 2015, 11:08 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(thpace @ Mar 22 2015, 10:52 PM)
somehow the serviceability rate of MKM is heavly discussed on malaysia defence but for me as far as i know, the mkm was deem satisfactory by the personals flying it.
*
rmaf is targeting 75-80% readiness level for the mkm, hopefully this ady achieved after the maintenance deal with sukhoi at lima 2013
KYPMbangi
post Mar 22 2015, 11:44 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(thpace @ Mar 22 2015, 11:40 PM)
the murica is heavy promoting little bird.. maybe there will be news soon for attack heli plan
*
little bird as attack heli.. well technically its an attack heli.. sweat.gif
kang pinoy cakap kita tiru diorang pulak cry.gif
KYPMbangi
post Mar 23 2015, 12:01 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(thpace @ Mar 22 2015, 11:53 PM)
my frend keep saying.. murica keep saying the cost effective of its platform. Heard there also a few putd also showing interest but again dont think that what they really wanted

little bird...  laugh.gif
*
but seriously all this guns on helis now (nuri and 109) is a throwback to the commies era when we used the alouette to carry 20mm cannon!

user posted image
KYPMbangi
post Mar 24 2015, 11:24 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
39 posts

Joined: Jun 2008


QUOTE(hantu.laut @ Mar 24 2015, 11:00 PM)
ferry is use in inland waterways not in ocean.
LPD/LCT is much alike commercial ship difference only in armament/Radar/Sensor, which can easily to be installed.

what is different military and commercial one do you think? others than weaponry.

if RMN can afford it, why need to convert container ship to become warship?
*
Anyway that all is just hearsay/gripevines or something, as rmn is more interested in models like the dokdo as past news have surfaced of the trying to acquire the "mini dokdo" which also might serve as the flagship carrier for the menhan's dream of an all-new marine brigade

The bunga mas were like a free gift anyway from misc berhad, it cost only rm1 per-ship blush.gif
A security coperation with local company to secure malaysian asset and interest

7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0617sec    0.29    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 6th December 2025 - 04:46 AM