Any reason why KLCI dropped 12 points?
Fundsupermart.com v9, QE feeds the bull. Ride along...
Fundsupermart.com v9, QE feeds the bull. Ride along...
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 07:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#341
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
Any reason why KLCI dropped 12 points?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 08:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#342
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 08:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#343
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 08:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#344
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 08:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#345
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(IvanWong1989 @ Apr 29 2015, 08:56 PM) If you want technical aspect, study the:1. Past performance/graph 2. Volatility factor/ratio 3. Sherpa ratio 4. FSM recommended funds list 5. Similar fund comparison between fund houses Enjoy! This post has been edited by David83: Apr 29 2015, 09:00 PM |
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 09:02 PM
Return to original view | Post
#346
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 09:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#347
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 09:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#348
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(yklooi @ Apr 29 2015, 09:33 PM) "Let's say you benchmark against the FBM KLCI, which is at 10%. If your fund is at 5%, you have already outperformed the benchmark, even though [your fund] is at 5%.Beating the benchmark can still mean negative returns". can someone pls explain this statement in layman term?... It means that your fund is doing better than the benchmark it uses. Lower loss and/or lower volatility. This post has been edited by David83: Apr 29 2015, 09:38 PM |
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 09:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#349
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Apr 29 2015, 09:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#350
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
52,874 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(yklooi @ Apr 29 2015, 09:46 PM) sure here it is..... page 2, 5th paragraphs..... https://www.kenangainvestors.com.my/KIB/KIB...ver%20Story.pdf QUOTE De Alwis also prefers to focus on coming up with new unit trust funds that look at absolute returns, instead He's trying to explaining the absolute return concept. Not sure what he meant but he's definitely missed some details in the example.of relying on benchmarking as a performance indicator. Many unit trusts use benchmarks based on stock or bond market indices. In contrast, funds that look at absolute returns are more concerned about the total returns they receive from the assets they are invested in. "Let's say you benchmark against the FBM KLCI, which is at 10%. If your fund is at 5%, you have already outperformed the benchmark, even though [your fund] is at 5%.Beating the benchmark can still mean negative returns. "We have come to a stage where this generation of investors are educated and are not looking for superstar funds or a one-year wonder. They just want it to be consistent. That is why we ensure that our funds have [steady] three, five and 10year records." This post has been edited by David83: Apr 29 2015, 09:50 PM |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0360sec
0.80
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 18th December 2025 - 06:29 AM |