Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
6 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Buying Advice Anyone owner of Sony Alpha 100 here?, Plan to buy...need opinion

views
     
TSEdwintst
post Oct 2 2006, 11:39 PM, updated 20y ago

New Member
*
Junior Member
17 posts

Joined: Sep 2006


Hi,
Newbie here. Any owner of Sony Alpha 100 here? Planning to buy but dunno if it's good or not...help help..!
gold3knight
post Oct 3 2006, 12:18 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,672 posts

Joined: Jun 2005


try here: smashpOp's Sony Alpha Gallery
scorgio
post Oct 3 2006, 12:26 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,695 posts

Joined: Jan 2005


Decent above average camera.
Though nothing spectacular to shout about.
External flash has a proprietary mount.
Used lenses & accessories are not easily available.
But doesn't matter if you just want a dSLR to P&S. Or you prefer to buy everything (lens & etc) new.
TSEdwintst
post Oct 3 2006, 01:04 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
17 posts

Joined: Sep 2006


RM3050 comes with 18-70 kit lens. What does everyone think? I heard the pic quality are bad under high ISO settings? It is true? Any other bad points to share??
lgs
post Oct 3 2006, 01:10 AM

Certified Noob
*******
Senior Member
2,374 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Subang / PJ



Sony ISO go up till 400 still good ,800 I cant accept ady ,other then ISO ,I would say should be no problem ,just tht the kit lens 18-70mm quality is not that perfect enough ,maybe u should wait for CZ *T 16-80mm F3.5-F4.5 .
BurgaFlippinMan
post Oct 3 2006, 06:12 AM

Wachaaa!
*******
Senior Member
6,486 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
juz go for the D80. wink.gif
minde
post Oct 3 2006, 07:25 AM

dreamt a king, woke up still king
*******
Senior Member
2,911 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: KL



QUOTE(BurgaFlippinMan @ Oct 3 2006, 06:12 AM)
juz go for the D80. wink.gif
*
yeap....i waited for Nikon D80 over this Sony. D80 Noise level at 1600 still near perfect ... can compete with canon edi.
shinchan^^
post Oct 3 2006, 07:40 AM

K66
*********
All Stars
21,256 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pekopon


QUOTE(Edwintst @ Oct 3 2006, 01:04 AM)
RM3050 comes with 18-70 kit lens. What does everyone think? I heard the pic quality are bad under high ISO settings? It is true? Any other bad points to share??
*
there is a shop quote me rm 3000 for kit at bb plaza
near the entrance out
ac98
post Oct 3 2006, 08:50 AM

The Spirit of Photography
*******
Senior Member
3,758 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Selayang


QUOTE(BurgaFlippinMan @ Oct 3 2006, 06:12 AM)
juz go for the D80. wink.gif
... or the Canon EOS 400D. RM3300 (or less) with a EF-S 18-55mm Kit Lens, you got nothing to loose brows.gif
shinchan^^
post Oct 3 2006, 08:51 AM

K66
*********
All Stars
21,256 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pekopon


alpha got the 18-70mm
plus Super Steady Shot on the body
ac98
post Oct 3 2006, 09:01 AM

The Spirit of Photography
*******
Senior Member
3,758 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Selayang


QUOTE(shinchan^^ @ Oct 3 2006, 08:51 AM)
alpha got the 18-70mm
plus Super Steady Shot on the body
That would be the 'technical' advantage they have ... mine would be : When you're actually OUT there you only see Canon-Nikon-Canon-Nikon-Canon-Nikon-Canon-Nikon-Canon-Nikon users ... maybe occasionally Olympus users, no Sony yet and definitely no professional users as far as I am concerned :

1. Cannot borrow lens
2. Cannot borrow flash
3. Cannot borrow battery in case flat
4. No one can help if setting went kelam kabut

My question to Edwintst is : How long can you afford to be a white elephant among your peers before more Sony owners come in (assuming you only wanna be a photo enthusiastes or shooting as a hobby)? Considering the limited amount of accessories (prices aside) i.e lenses and flash Sony have for their SLRs, how far can you bring this interest of yours?

Should you decide to chuck your entire system within this or next year, keep in mind that cutting your purchase price in half and selling also no use. A new Nikon or Canon or Olympus entry level is only less than RM2,000 away from the price you're selling.

Know the truth.

This post has been edited by ac98: Oct 3 2006, 09:08 AM
shinchan^^
post Oct 3 2006, 09:03 AM

K66
*********
All Stars
21,256 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pekopon


QUOTE(ac98 @ Oct 3 2006, 09:01 AM)
That would be the 'technical' advantage they have ... mine would be : When you're actually OUT there you only see Canon-Nikon-Canon-Nikon-Canon-Nikon-Canon-Nikon-Canon-Nikon users ... maybe occasionally Olympus users, no Sony yet and definitely no professional users as far as I am concerned :

1. Cannot borrow lens
2. Cannot borrow flash
3. Cannot borrow battery in case flat
4. No one can help if setting went kelam kabut
*
problem is that
r ur so called friends will borrow their few Ks precious lens for you
maybe test shots from their camera thats it.
ac98
post Oct 3 2006, 09:09 AM

The Spirit of Photography
*******
Senior Member
3,758 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Selayang


Enough-lor Shinchan ... later Alpha owners coming with their flame throwers at us.
shinchan^^
post Oct 3 2006, 09:33 AM

K66
*********
All Stars
21,256 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pekopon


alpha 18mm-200mm Rm1.8k+
alpha 90-300mm Rm800+

keke
InfiniteVoid
post Oct 3 2006, 09:38 AM

シュガ- グライダ-
******
Senior Member
1,143 posts

Joined: Dec 2005
But Alpha can still share KM lens, right?
shinchan^^
post Oct 3 2006, 09:39 AM

K66
*********
All Stars
21,256 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pekopon


yes Minolta A Mount
lgs
post Oct 3 2006, 10:40 AM

Certified Noob
*******
Senior Member
2,374 posts

Joined: Jun 2005
From: Subang / PJ



alpha 18mm-200mm Rm1.8k+ ,why pay RM1.8k for a tamron OEM lens -.-"

mayb look for tamron mount KM 18-200mm cna ady ,less then RM1.5k ,and CZ is a much much better lens

Sony/KM standard

CZ* T lens
KM G lens
KM lens
Tamron OEM KM digital lens

18-70 and 18-200 is the 4rd de tongue.gif
welwitchia
post Oct 3 2006, 10:49 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,219 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Come to think about it..I was supposed to be a Sony alpha user. Then 400D came along with about the same price point.. Most of my friends advised me against a Sony (mainly because its a new comer??).. so I ended up with a 400D. Dang, wish someone had told me how crappy Canon the kit lens is. Now i have to shell out more dough for a better lens. Heard the alpha kit lens kicks a$$.
ac98
post Oct 3 2006, 11:41 AM

The Spirit of Photography
*******
Senior Member
3,758 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Selayang


QUOTE(shinchan^^ @ Oct 3 2006, 09:39 AM)
yes Minolta A Mount
*
I tell you what ... the Golden Years for Minolta was the Dynax, I never deny that. Those were the best years for them.

I still remember when I was in Secondary school and in the Kelab Fotografi. The president is very well off and he was using a Dynax. He tried to poison everyone one to buy the camera but it was obvious beyond the reach of everybody. I was having my dad's Canon AT-1 (Manu. 1973) and I remembered it was in the canteen he laughed out so loud that my camera was an old Manual one.

Cut the long story short, Minolta soon loose out to competition becoz Canon and Nikon was all out against each other in a technology 'cold war' starting from the lower end consumer compact digicams all the way to highend professional DSLRs.

Canon Malaysia actually threw in RM20 Million for advertising ALONE in 2006/2007, can you believe that?! (Source @ thestar.com.my) I think Minolta Malaysia could't even reach that amount of money via camera sales alone!

Remember Sony's 'semi-pro' point-and-shoots? The DSC-R1 and T929? I consider those models 'gone case' liao. Two of my friends are users and one changed to Nikon D70 and the other guy changed to a Canon 300D later. You cannot believe how much they spent on the camera, accesories, flash and not to mention memory sticks!
ac98
post Oct 3 2006, 11:44 AM

The Spirit of Photography
*******
Senior Member
3,758 posts

Joined: Apr 2006
From: Selayang


QUOTE(welwitchia @ Oct 3 2006, 10:49 AM)
Come to think about it..I was supposed to be a Sony alpha user. Then 400D came along with about the same price point.. Most of my friends advised me against a Sony (mainly because its a new comer??).. so I ended up with a 400D. Dang, wish someone had told me how crappy Canon the kit lens is. Now i have to shell out more dough for a better lens. Heard the alpha kit lens kicks a$$.
*
You call the Kit Lens CRAPPY-ah? It can focus in a foggy cubicle with a model showering in hot water inside you know?! Dun believe me? Lets yumcha I show you the pic, in A4 size! tongue.gif

6 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0217sec    0.69    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 20th December 2025 - 09:01 AM