QUOTE(MasBoleh! @ Jan 30 2015, 02:19 AM)
above just joke only, we not order any SU-50/55
maybe 10 year later possible will buy.
Military Thread V15, Gong Xi Fa Cai; Huat ah
|
|
Jan 30 2015, 09:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#41
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Jan 30 2015, 09:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#42
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Jan 30 2015, 10:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#43
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
quite cute product Dahir Insaat
|
|
|
Jan 31 2015, 02:29 PM
Return to original view | Post
#44
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Jan 31 2015, 03:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#45
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
seems Our A400M success first fly yesterday..... i see some one post photo at twitter
see below: Antonio Rodriguez @antoniovillarin 13h13 hours ago Malaysian first A400M after maiden flight. Included camera equiped chasing aircraft and RAT deployed! @VadeAviones ![]() This post has been edited by waja2000: Jan 31 2015, 03:22 PM |
|
|
Feb 1 2015, 01:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#46
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(trollboy @ Feb 1 2015, 12:01 PM) nice video of advanced super hornet well Marhalim Abas said this just marketing gimmick ... it still Super Hornet. my favourite candidate for mrca mindef pls buy 3 squadron and put 1 in labuan for my view it have pros and cons. and going to end production in 2016~2020, depend order ... this should be last version F-18, call F-18 ASH (F18 SH block3), went we buy it, after 15 year later (2030+) during mid life upgrade maybe we no have upgrade packages or need pay boeing for RnD for technology upgrade. will most of F18 user like US and Australia, they mostly using F18 SH (block2) they will get enhance version during 2020-2022 for mid life upgrade than use until end of life. for as we can try to find 2nd hand from US navy F18 EF then upgrade to Block 2/3 spec so can use until 2030 like current F18D after mid life upgrade。 If still want to get F18 ASH, good to buy 8~10 unit for Butterworth AB to form a full F-18 squadron. than other squadron in Labuan AB. This post has been edited by waja2000: Feb 1 2015, 01:02 PM |
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 08:17 AM
Return to original view | Post
#47
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 07:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#48
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 3 2015, 06:46 PM) HQ-9, I sincerely believe is even too much for our budget. No point getting one battery only to protect one area. We wanted to get a few batteries to cover a wider region FD2000 not same to HQ-9 Make no mistake, instead of reducing intrusions i believe there will be more. Why? simple, we install they sure want to test it They know we wont shoot and to study our doctrine. That china did, they put missile defence near taiwan and japan. US come do join practice, china quickly set up signal intelligence station near the missile defence area to gather information on US planes |
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 07:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#49
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(trollboy @ Feb 3 2015, 07:25 PM) Yeah FD2000 have addition anti ballistic/big size missile capability..... So i think FK-3 suitable because its like a standalone system Meanwhile this is more for the air defence system of the country FK3 more like aircraft size and anti normal missile defense capability. |
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 07:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#50
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 3 2015, 07:33 PM) yes, after they change country Constitution low ....due to china sentiment, seem many country hard to buy directly weapon from japan, now mostly look like Japan they doing via technology transfer/cooperation. still take time to see how Japan sell weapon. |
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 07:50 PM
Return to original view | Post
#51
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 3 2015, 07:36 PM) ya ya typo but still based on the same system just the radar and missile variant diff now now is see we need more UCAV ASAP..... too many sea threat like ship robbery around coast mersing, than our ship need many hrs to location... u know right so slow our kedah class.but then again.. i wound prefer getting s-300 PMU2 although the cost is significantly more than china copies if we can get Yilong UCAV, cost just usd 2 million, get 2~3 unit put in Kuantan AB , can patrol entire east peninsular coast guard, any case happen, UCAV can reach case location less 1 hrs to recon situation. This post has been edited by waja2000: Feb 3 2015, 07:51 PM |
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 08:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#52
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 3 2015, 07:57 PM) u do know right one of their uav just crashed? uav definaly have higer rate of crash/shot down/system/comm error/ that first place we use uav to reduce pilot risk and hardware cost....minus pilot quality.. i serious doubt china product quality than u want to said quality US uav more case crash .... event get iran take over control uav... than china uav just 1/8 of US made price, so no big deal at all for the crash ... |
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 08:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#53
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(ayanami_tard @ Feb 3 2015, 08:13 PM) unless the sub can turn into a giant robot(or a high school girl),i don't think they are that much advanced. granted the RAN only have them faulty collin class SSK, but they could get less faulty ones from South Korea. cheaper and faster to build as well Soryu have few advance ...Them saying that they wont gonna help Japan in the event of China Japan war that made japanese top brass to be reluctant to share strategic assets with them - 500 meter submerge for conventional submarine..... - size 4200 tons - new with AIP with lithium-ion batteries tech .... advance can submerge for long hrs in sea in high-speed。 |
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 08:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#54
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 3 2015, 08:30 PM) german 214 is not far behind.. given it german, they will sell as long u have the money German 214 too small, then they come out Type 216 4000 tons design than propose to OZ .... but it still just a paper spec .... however Soryu already use in Japan Self defense navy, mature and proven. neh.. RMN will nvr go gas turbine again We didnt send an evaluation team but no news after tat, guess that the gas turbine was a turn off. Can be replace with diesal but given its limited useful age and cost, just not worth it RMN navy no mater how they need/face to use gas turbine if buy big ship like over 6000 tons. unless they still keep small ship. gas turbine can provide a lot more power to ship. |
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 08:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#55
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(azriel @ Feb 3 2015, 08:57 PM) Don't know why there is a lot of bashing of Airbus & Eurocopter in MP.Net especially about Tiger helicopter & A400. Petrol price force many country cut budget/spending now .... http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showt...ut-Tiger-orders A400M just too new, sure face many issue... it take 5 year at lease to mature。 This post has been edited by waja2000: Feb 3 2015, 09:01 PM |
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 09:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#56
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(MrUbikeledek @ Feb 3 2015, 09:03 PM) The French also have a large conventional submarine design on the drawing board, the SMX Ocean. The problem is, this large SSK is quite expensive. Almost as expensive as the nuc. Small country will not be able to afford it, while rich country will most likely choose nuclear sub. not only that big submarine need deep and big sea to help them hide...than our water just very Shallow water like at South china sea and selat melaka This post has been edited by waja2000: Feb 3 2015, 09:13 PM |
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 09:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#57
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 3 2015, 09:04 PM) Our EC725 does not come problem free, the a400 have been criticized all around not sure ours will be problem free or not below is 2 issue from many A400M problem ....add to tiger... pls pls no airbus or eurocopter again pls - the cargo bay is 5cm lower than ordered - the loading ramp only holds out 2/3 of the promised weight |
|
|
Feb 3 2015, 09:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#58
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Feb 4 2015, 10:20 AM
Return to original view | Post
#59
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
so many view/commend in AEW and MPA on malaysiadefense report
This post has been edited by waja2000: Feb 4 2015, 10:21 AM |
|
|
Feb 4 2015, 11:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#60
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(madoka @ Feb 4 2015, 06:25 PM) Buy from us, get ELTA/ELBIT made system inside since Indonesia has put several electronic system made in Israel into our MPA and patrol aircraft If not wrong PTDI work with Israel for south korean Coast Guard CN-235MPA ..... they use Israel electronic. and we can give you insurance for their product installation Muslim brotherhood at it's best QUOTE(Dreadstar @ Feb 4 2015, 09:37 PM) If we buy CN-235 MPA will be make sure no Israel parts QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 4 2015, 10:21 PM) anything out right made in Israel.. is a officially no no but is more like radar ocean master search radar still no Israel product, but Thales newest Search Master AESA radar (replace Ocean master Radar) is product cooperation Thales/ELBIT. but made in indonesia mungkin boleh even may have some jews items inside. As long no one mentioned it, no one will know but no need to worry, CN-235 MPA design with 3 system, Thalas AMASCOS, BEA/Selex-es Seaspray , Raytheon system up to customer choose. since our Super-lynx helicopter is using BEA system Seaspray 3000 as search radar, no issue for CN235 MPA using newest Seaspray 5000/7000 AESA search and surveillance radar. This post has been edited by waja2000: Feb 4 2015, 11:09 PM |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0563sec
0.32
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 01:16 PM |