QUOTE(yinchet @ Feb 4 2015, 11:16 PM)
ATR72 too many crash ... seems un-safe plane ....
Military Thread V15, Gong Xi Fa Cai; Huat ah
Military Thread V15, Gong Xi Fa Cai; Huat ah
|
|
Feb 4 2015, 11:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#61
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Feb 4 2015, 11:47 PM
Return to original view | Post
#62
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 4 2015, 11:28 PM) ![]() Saab unveils C-295 Erieye concept http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/...concept-315879/ but seem not practical, the radar mount too high, it create more balancing and resistance issue... than u should know why AEW plane always like using plane wing mount in bottom of airframe, jike like in Saab 340&300/145 R-99A,also B373 AEW etc... because wing mount in top of airframe will close to radar and block radar down side scan up to 20~25%. that why in picture they mount radar very high。 This post has been edited by waja2000: Feb 5 2015, 12:09 AM |
|
|
Feb 5 2015, 12:06 AM
Return to original view | Post
#63
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 5 2015, 12:00 AM) But so far no interest But would we prefer turboprop or jet engine? price tag and US restriction US things always come with term and conditions. Rather get EU or russian stuff, no TnC as long u have the $$$ AEW always best with long range turbojet plane (usually commercial jet retrofit) that why best for Erieye AEW is install in A319LR/CJ, buy A319LR it have 10,000km range, 11 hrs endurance fly, have speed, small (small than B373-800), AA/MAS can service, parts easy, Erieye use alot Thales system, eazy for Thales to re-trofit in A319LR. event big space enough to install front/rear radar to cover 360%, suface search radar at bottom airframe, price A319LR about usd 90 million,all system install estimated USD 200 million, value enough for AEW&C. This post has been edited by waja2000: Feb 5 2015, 12:08 AM |
|
|
Feb 5 2015, 12:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#64
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Feb 5 2015, 12:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#65
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 5 2015, 12:11 AM) Integration not much, bcos erieye system already use in may AEW jet, it not re-develop entire system, just more like fit & finishing integration no new jet, all system move from existing move over to new A319 plane. my estimation Erieye system cost about usd 50 million, usd 50 million for integration cost. so cost around usd 200 million after add A319LR cost. max also no more than usd 250 million. This post has been edited by waja2000: Feb 5 2015, 12:23 AM |
|
|
Feb 5 2015, 12:27 AM
Return to original view | Post
#66
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(trollboy @ Feb 5 2015, 12:23 AM) technical is like that, but .... tahan 6 hrs in plane? for all 4-5 crew event us navy also usually 2~3 hrs fly only. better give more better environment to crew .... and than " The unit cost of the E-2D Advanced Hawkeye is $179.36 million (flyaway cost in FY 2014)" after add parts, maintenance , training, emulator, cost usd 220+- already. for this price, i get Erieye system, at lease more comfort for crew. This post has been edited by waja2000: Feb 5 2015, 12:33 AM |
|
|
Feb 5 2015, 01:05 AM
Return to original view | Post
#67
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Feb 5 2015, 01:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#68
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
![]() China WZ-10 fire Air-To-Air missile hit target ....(on exercise) This post has been edited by waja2000: Feb 5 2015, 01:50 PM |
|
|
Feb 5 2015, 11:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#69
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 5 2015, 10:12 PM) they maybe no have simulator, only few unit they have, they can send pilot to oversea for training. event have also old version, went get new S-70S all old item dont want already.for me, better S-70i SLEP/re-trofit wiht glass cockpit and engine, electronic first, than simulator buy on new cockpit .... if not soon still still need so slep/upgrade (already 15 year using) This post has been edited by waja2000: Feb 5 2015, 11:26 PM |
|
|
Feb 6 2015, 01:19 AM
Return to original view | Post
#70
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Feb 6 2015, 01:34 AM
Return to original view | Post
#71
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Feb 6 2015, 11:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#72
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
|
Feb 6 2015, 02:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#73
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
![]() my simple PS photo ....ok ah... Airbus A319 Erieye AEW&C |
|
|
Feb 7 2015, 12:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#74
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(yinchet @ Feb 6 2015, 09:04 PM) What for? might as well buy the wedge tail. A319 Erieye just only one of solution ...other jet also can if meet spec.. and it taking many consideration, A319 best solution for Erieye..The cheapest platform for erieye would be atr72 or we can go for slightly expensive g650 or bombardier global express. All three above have their platform modified for military usage. Though it was not g650 but g550 was modified to be aew by israel. ATR72 just like C-295, it have top wings than block much Erieye radar, than have to mount radar very high...... g650 and bombardier global express. have payload limitation, it only have 3 tons or less payload, event 340AEW also have 10% more payload than this 2 jet, if they hard to fit it, it maybe only can 2-3 console, means capability reduce. Saab2000/EMB145 have more than 5 tons payload. Erieye radar it self already 1.3 tons weight and 9.7 meter length unlike G550 just mount radar at airframe for 2 side. much lighter than Erieye Radar. This post has been edited by waja2000: Feb 7 2015, 12:47 AM |
|
|
Feb 7 2015, 09:48 AM
Return to original view | Post
#75
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(yinchet @ Feb 7 2015, 04:05 AM) Actually erieye radar wieght is 900kg. that 900kg is scaled down version of Saab's Erieye, only about close to 8 meter radar, it install in small plane ike Saab340 AEW.... detection range only 300km... offcouse it can install in G550/650/BGE. but we want more to full version with 9.7 meter radar so can get more detection range. http://www.deagel.com/Aircraft-Warners-and...a001470001.aspx Iinm full mission computer and esm is less than 2tons. I would like to provide the source but it seem like the pdf link was gone. affcouse, it up to engineer to calculate the payload, fitting to airframe, power system and plane capability. if can fit, all welcome. mindef just have come out AEW project, ask aircraft manufacture propose there product to fit Erieye (if Erieye is fix), set mini spec like endurance range and hours/fuel consumption/maintenance packages finally still up to Mindef to think budget/operation/logistic detail. This post has been edited by waja2000: Feb 7 2015, 10:03 AM |
|
|
Feb 9 2015, 02:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#76
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 9 2015, 02:08 PM) and dont why we are getting tat.. no read news ah....even Mil-28NE better if looking at capabilities wise and ability to carry 3 additional special ops crew although it mainly intended to rescue down heli crew Mil-28 very danger, after firing missile, smoke from missile can cause Mi-28 crash. Gas ingestion suspected as Russian army Mi-28N crashes http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/...crashes-329383/ |
|
|
Feb 9 2015, 04:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#77
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 9 2015, 02:40 PM) neh all attack heli face the risk of gas ingestion, viper and apache also faced risk of gas ingestion especially during hover and opposing wind condition and firing multiple rockets than means mi-28 design no good/mistake ? apache have wider plyon to put greater distances between the rocket pod and engine and the same as viper. The rocket pod is always at the edge russian like to put their rocket pod close to the engine while missiles at edge opposite of western style |
|
|
Feb 9 2015, 10:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#78
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 9 2015, 07:27 PM) neh, if design bad, wont have client would like to buy also despite it bargain price but seems like mindef will not get heavy attack helicopter ..... more like medium range. more like their preference to where they like to put their rocket pod. Close to engine higher the risk then again, only in hover position you have greatest risk. Attack heli are on the move most of the time then again 6 biji.. i doubt we will put in anti-tank role. More like a stop-gap attack heli for now. When we got more money, a full battalion so far only Tiger, T129 , AH-1z, WZ10 left only. |
|
|
Feb 10 2015, 01:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#79
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(thpace @ Feb 10 2015, 12:01 AM) i was told.. not necessary a full fledge attack heli with all the fancy anti tank role, what the the media interpret as attack heli supposedly a gunship, basically can be any heli armed with HMG only Attack Helicopter already long time want to get it by army...Do you notice why the announcement is for esscom and the rather small number - 6 biji does make sense right? Why would you want a dedicated expensive attack heli, when most of the time wat you will be doing is shooting sulus.. not tanks, not heavy armed vehicles and doing routine/regular patrol duties little bird stand a good chance Esscom just help them to get it more faster ... ESSCOM just one of duty, attack helicopter can use around entire sabah/sarawak if mission needed, event can send to peninsular (using A400M) if any case needed. attach helicopter just strange our army capability. than think more future, it no limited to esscom only, no so anti army to getting there anti-helicopter .... those gunship no better performance/weapon than attack helicopter。。。。 This post has been edited by waja2000: Feb 10 2015, 01:38 AM |
|
|
Feb 10 2015, 01:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#80
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
137 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0228sec
0.53
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 09:36 AM |