QUOTE(GNR @ Feb 26 2015, 01:43 PM)
Wtf, then the reason why it's also near the "SKYACTIV Technology" is because people see the badge so nice, so will want to touch it. Therefore it will protect scratches from people's finger nails.
Coating is supposed to cover the kedut kedut? Can I return the car to the SA because of this? Not fair leh, new car is supposed to be very shiny. Not kedut kedut.
i doubt they can do anything, since all mazda coming from thailand is like this. Maybe CKD better paint job?
QUOTE(chinlail @ Feb 26 2015, 02:40 PM)
Your FC a is rather high, been stepping on it? I think VPR is bad for FC, their regular Ron 97 is better. I have switched to BHP 97 for my M2 and getting around a range of 580 km for the same amount of fuel. I'll pump tml to confirm, thinking of switching to Ron 95 as well, to compare. PaulTan says it's better for FC but I do feel the engine is very smooth on 97. Is it still smooth on 95 so far? Skyactiv is supposed to run on regular just as well..
Fyi, my trip comp says 7.8l/100km, ave speed is 31km, what's yours?
not really, the car still less then 1000km, i never rev higher than 3000rpm
i pumped VPR cause in my 2.0l Lancer last time, it gave the most mileage compare to R97 and R95. But as i experience b4, VPR seems to only give more mileage on bigger CC cars. Hence today i use Shell R95 and see if can get the same or similar mileage. if yes then i will use R95 instead and maybe test on R97 next refill
Will check the trip comp later for the avg fc and speed
QUOTE(sanadi @ Feb 26 2015, 02:56 PM)
His FC is better than yours. He's getting 13.81 km/L which is 7.2 L/100km.
i wonder what the average on my trip computer