QUOTE(gogo2 @ Jan 28 2015, 09:58 PM)
RM1260 discounted priceAMD Radeon™ Discussion V12, Latest - 14.12 | WHQL - 14.12
AMD Radeon™ Discussion V12, Latest - 14.12 | WHQL - 14.12
|
|
Jan 28 2015, 10:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#81
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 28 2015, 10:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#82
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
|
|
|
Jan 28 2015, 10:11 PM
Return to original view | Post
#83
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
|
|
|
Jan 28 2015, 10:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#84
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
This is what I found, just rerun the test to get the screenshot. Leftmost picture are High setting while next to it are in ultra setting.
Two settings tried, namely High and ultra setting. both utilises similar amount of GPU which are 30-33% and VRAM was maxed out by using 1.9GB out of 2GB. But I found that ultra setting uses 1.5GB of system memory, i guess this is the sign of bottleneck, while High settings wew use only about 500MB System memory. My experience: High: very playable altho FPS are not that great. Ultra: stuttering like hell... Detail : Ultra setting: everything max out with AA set to MSAA 8x High setting: everything set to high with AA set to FXAA. I hope you all are willing to share your view, your precious view enable me to learn about different point of view. For those who interested, I'm using microsoft process explorer, i hope to see your experience, TQ This post has been edited by wongkoewei: Jan 28 2015, 10:16 PM Attached thumbnail(s) |
|
|
Jan 28 2015, 10:17 PM
Return to original view | Post
#85
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
|
|
|
Jan 28 2015, 10:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#86
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 28 2015, 11:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#87
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
|
|
|
Jan 28 2015, 11:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#88
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
|
|
|
Jan 28 2015, 11:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#89
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
|
|
|
Jan 28 2015, 11:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#90
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
|
|
|
Jan 29 2015, 12:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#91
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
|
|
|
Jan 29 2015, 12:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#92
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
|
|
|
Jan 29 2015, 12:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#93
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
QUOTE(terradrive @ Jan 29 2015, 12:37 AM) There are so many 4GB cards on the market, I would think that's the target for game developers for years to come. I see... too many different opinions around... making me really blurred out~ The ceiling for game developer's VRAM requirement when designing a game now would be 2GB, 3GB and 4GB. On rare cases 6GB or 8GB. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 29 2015, 09:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#94
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
|
|
|
Jan 29 2015, 10:14 PM
Return to original view | Post
#95
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
QUOTE(Unseen83 @ Jan 29 2015, 09:10 PM) If there are any confirmed news of new GPU arriving before GST, I will definitely go for it. I'm concentrating for 290X just following the reason of their dirt cheap pricing now. With similar pricing as GTX 980, I can make it with a 290X plus one decent PSU, may be plus one SSD. If the PSU will not be needed, this option may even offer me much less cost compared with coming gen, which i think it wont be cheap especially for GTX 980 rivalling model~ |
|
|
Jan 29 2015, 10:43 PM
Return to original view | Post
#96
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
|
|
|
Jan 30 2015, 09:38 AM
Return to original view | Post
#97
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
|
|
|
Jan 30 2015, 09:40 AM
Return to original view | Post
#98
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
|
|
|
Jan 30 2015, 09:44 AM
Return to original view | Post
#99
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
|
|
|
Jan 30 2015, 09:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#100
|
![]()
Junior Member
35 posts Joined: Nov 2014 |
QUOTE(gogo2 @ Jan 30 2015, 09:49 AM) CF ? Even single card can fill up 4GB. Two R9 290X will need 8GB. Frankly now only a very few case that 4GB will be bottlenecked. I think now for Crossfire/Sli, we need 8GB per card or 16GB per two card. For CF, the effective VRAM will not be increased as both cards will be provided with identical info, mean if a game that will use 3.5GB in single card, it will use up 7GB in total or 3.5GB per card if u go for CF. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0542sec
0.34
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 5th December 2025 - 09:16 PM |