Whats the magic on 390x other than faster vram???
Its beating 980.

Although most reviews using overclocked 50mhz units.

I trust hardwarecanucks more than anybody else.

980 20-30percent lead gone.

Youve got a point there on the throttle.

390x 8gb atm looks like a steal.

Time to choose. Epeen or efficiency
Part of my brain say go epeen.

But cpu combi atm all boring n so is skylake with ddr4 so immature.

Dp1.3. Y cant amd put this in

Dude thr core clock was oced like 5 percent. But it killed of the previous lead of 30percent 980 had.

tdp dude.

a lot of ppl dont seem to understand tdp. Got a lot of noobs on PC Gaming Community (Malaysia) FB

nvidia measures tdp at 85C with their own respectable db sound. Thats y the clock rates so low with massive oc reserved
until they see a better yield with lower temps they up it. Just like titan black vs 780ti. Its not for fun.

Fury X in comparison should be at 50C. Need to see the aircool version.

temps affect tdp value.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jun 20 2015, 11:28 AM

bro reviewers oc is not stable. Minus about 75-100mhz.

Dunno y gm200 titan X and 980ti.. Benchmark, 2 hour stable and fully stable.. can vary a lot.


This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jun 20 2015, 12:06 PM

Never met an idiot who cling that much to his card.
Another smeagol. Btw its about that johor idiot.

That techreview report was insightful. Although they should put that tonga tess accelaration is a trait in the new gcn. So its not a apple to apple comparison with 290x numbers.

Are those fury throughput data an estimation or facts??
The second data table.

Just put him in ignore. That guy will nvr post something thats informative



This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jun 21 2015, 12:04 AM

Thought so then that throughput numbers n tesselation power is false. Cause the base assumption is 290x .

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jun 21 2015, 07:29 PM

Afaik there was no optimization on r9 390s other than
Third party cooler with significantly higher vddc 1.2v
, overclocked by 50-100mhz, vrams 8gb higher clocked by 20%.

Now there are reports showing there was no increase in tesselation performance. It was driver tweaking.

So if we do a wired setting on heaven we can see "optimization" or lack of tesselation. I call that cheating or just reducing fidelity that game engine intended. But on other perspective users would enjoy better framerates at acceptable graphic fidelity.

Everybody call this r&d . Lol

Dirt Rally. I heard it wasnt maxed out setting. Btw its was about 8.4xx k pixels but marketing is spinning it as 12k.

I am curious as to the aa performance. Early debates said the card will suffer a huge loss in performance.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jun 22 2015, 11:37 AM

thats good. he is pretty much up there among the very few true to his word.

You will need to do a chroma subsampling like what nvidia did before for 4k@60

Thats pretty impressive for 10% oc on stock voltage. I wonder how much is the stock voltage seeing all 390x now running at 1.2v

They can do legacy support like what they did for titan x etc. That need to ask unwinder

only way to confirm the numbers is asking hwlabs how many rads they shipped out

So that answered the bs on limited supply.

Should be. Also lol welcome brown cardbox



This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jun 22 2015, 04:24 PM

This def sapphire thingy. Seriously suprised the rads are not damaged.

The amd review units were all good thick black foam pads.

2899 for that. Should i go right now n grab it??
Hmm test rig/parts all in the box.

Two units. 2899 non nego. Hmm. No case to fit that.
N need to get a freesync monitor.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jun 22 2015, 05:18 PM

kizwan

He is just pointing out frustation as a amd user. We all been there. As for AMD user/fans. I think their tolerance/loyalty to AMD doesnt reflect the performance/experience. Thats what he is trying to say.

Did you flash ure 290 to a 290x??

If nvidia posted a crap like DA 5k@30 fps medium setting closer to 980 launch for maxwell 2, we would see a 10page hate fest in Nvidia thread.

Anyway arkham knights launch now is 12pm instead of 12am.
Amd as i speculated has drivers for it. Read that somewhere.
This is the game fury X will try to show off its edge against 980ti.

vram @1440p reported by some 980 preaccess users is 4gb

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jun 23 2015, 10:09 AM

Think now with cf support freesync reviews should be better

Arkham knights min spec for amd is a 7950. Thats insane

Any benchmarks yet??

Day one patch is not in yet.

So far early access seems to be from steam uk

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jun 23 2015, 10:46 AM