I'm keeping my 290X after seeing the block diagram of Fury. Tessellation performance won't be that much faster than 290X, among other things. Disappointing. You can read Techreport explains it

" AMD Considering A Breakup Of CPUs And Graphics – Potentially Spinning Off A Business Division " oh look AMD gonna break-up it's CPU and Graphic...

http://wccftech.com/amd-splitting-enterprise-graphics/

" AMD Radeon R9 Fury X Demoed at 12K Resolution, 60 FPS in Dirt Rally Eyefinity Setup " - Whatt 12K constant 60hz wooo

http://wccftech.com/amd-fury-x-tested-12k-60fps/

eh woo nice SSD than... by way are you jump ship to Red Fury ??

This post has been edited by Unseen83: Jun 20 2015, 11:06 AM

tdp dude.

a lot of ppl dont seem to understand tdp. Got a lot of noobs on PC Gaming Community (Malaysia) FB

nvidia measures tdp at 85C with their own respectable db sound. Thats y the clock rates so low with massive oc reserved
until they see a better yield with lower temps they up it. Just like titan black vs 780ti. Its not for fun.

Fury X in comparison should be at 50C. Need to see the aircool version.

temps affect tdp value.

This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jun 20 2015, 11:28 AM

I remember by lowering R9 290's temperature from 95C to around 50C nets some ~20 watt savings.
Those people slapped in the AIO liquid cooler on the 290

Have you see nvidia gpu result with water cooling yet?
You will be suprised on GTX980 water cooled temperature.

On pcper.com article about EVGA Hydro Copper GTX 980 Water Block testing, the gpu was clocked at base clock 1407mhz with only average temp of 40'C.
Most time spent on boost clock of 1582mhz.
Reviewer said the only limiting factor from further overclocking is software-limited voltage regulation.

If Fury X is aimed to compete with GTX980TI, I think Nvidia probably will follow suit with similar 'official' water cooling edition.
Two can play at that game.
For instance, EVGA GTX 980 Ti Hybrid

Notice that most benchmark claiming Fury X beats GTX980Ti at its stock clock.

Too bad Nvidia will probably artifically limit the maximum allowable voltage.

bro reviewers oc is not stable. Minus about 75-100mhz.

Dunno y gm200 titan X and 980ti.. Benchmark, 2 hour stable and fully stable.. can vary a lot.


This post has been edited by cstkl1: Jun 20 2015, 12:06 PM

so strange... hmm is this Nvidia GTX or AMD R threads ... ?? oh my when AMD R9 Fury X out somebody need to post a lot story about Fury on Nvidia threads on their First HBM memory GPU... on it Sleek small form AMD R9 Nano.. hm too bad competitor wait next year to bring out gpu with HBM..

wait, is there any problem with the discussion? I don't think so.

As a competitor, its obvious that Nvidia's move is going to be to beat a previous gen card with better efficiency. The R9 290 was meant to compete with the GTX 780, no?

I know the current gen of R9 300 is just a rebrand and AMD is paying the price of a case too late to the party, but seems that people seem to forget what the fiasco was about with the foundries on 20nm. It would have made no sense to invest again in 28nm knowing that the next node jump is around the corner, which is why they focused on getting top of the line HBM on 28nm instead of going all out.

No doubt AMD is sinking into debts, but continuing to invest top to bottom cards on 28nm seems like a waste for me. 16nm finfet is a better bet than wasting RnD on 28nm, which would be a bonus if Samsung buys AMD.

Biggest joke of the day right there

Bulk order anyone? 390X/FuryX

why 390x ? the 390 is essentially a 290/390 with lower clocks, but same SP count.

Not even slightly. You'll see.

nice.. respect that guy... and his opinion... i could say same with benchmark(provided by AMD).. by result.. eh AMD R9 Fury X perform 5-10FPS more than GTX 980 Ti


http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/208541-a...dias-gtx-980-ti

wo ! Discussion no problem.. very welcome like most AMD Fan are open minded all good.. is just me seen alot Elite Nvidia on here.. Feel all Honor that..

by way RuffStuff like jap porn got blur up.. or is it just my dirty mind... misrepresented the profile pic u have there.. and if so i think you misrepresented my earlier comment to...

don't trust benchmark from AMD. i prefer to wait more people benchmark it.

sure i'm with you 100% i don't trust if it's from GPU chip maker.. look at Nvidia GTX 970 Mem fiasco.. 4gb.. but only usable 3.5GB hmm YES your correct!

ya nvidia cheater. that time i bought 970 cos i prefer nvidia & the card is new + my budget around that price so no one to blame.

u made a great choice get ur nissan rather 390x.

This post has been edited by ngkhanmein: Jun 20 2015, 10:12 PM

no is misunderstanding between engineer and marketing.. it's still is 4GB just 0.5gb is partition into lower performance.. yet if you gaming on 1080p/1440p Should be no problem IS also BEST GPU to get at that budget why AMD saw it's and Lower down price haha..

off-topic: Nissan my Choice ride.. AMD Radeon is my Choice Gpu

It reminds me of the

Xiaomi > all

or

Inspira > all commend in /k