QUOTE(kidmad @ Mar 26 2015, 07:50 PM)
anything not near colorless forget about it. your naked eye can differentiate. just go to the shop and do the comparison.
Anything which is small and has more than 58 cut that's pretty much not eye candy anymore again your eye can differentiate it see the selections in poh kong which has 108 cut and compare to a normal GIA stone which has around 58 cuts. those in poh kong for 0.5C with 108 cut... forget about it if the stone which i'm looking for is 0.7 and below.
I'll always go for Carat, Color, Clarity and then Cutting.
If im choosing a bigger rock perhaps 1C and above then i'll go for Carat, Color, Cutting then Clarity. Like it or not Carat and Color comes first for me.
As far as what I know the so called "108 cuts" still does not have significant scientific ground to evidence that it is more better and more sparkling, it tends to a kind of "marketing strategy" rather than real scientific parameter. Nothing about wrong or true, up to you believe or not.
In addition, this is the first times I heard somebody said cutting is the
last consideration among the 4Cs for small stones.
It is advisable to refer the statements and reviews of diamond academicians rather than diamond marketers. Such information is everywhere in website.
An unwell or inferior cutting will significantly affects the sparkling of a diamond, it is easily notified by naked eye.
Let see how GIA describes about cutting:
QUOTE
Cut is the factor that fuels a diamond’s fire, sparkle and brilliance.
The traditional 58 facets in a round brilliant diamond, each precisely cut and defined, are as small as two millimeters in diameter. But without this precision, a diamond wouldn’t be nearly as beautiful. The allure of a particular diamond depends more on cut than anything else.
Though extremely difficult to analyze or quantify, the cut of any diamond has three attributes: brilliance (the total light reflected from a diamond), fire (the dispersion of light into the colors of the spectrum), and scintillation (the pattern of light and dark areas and the flashes of light, or sparkle, when a diamond is moved).
See how Lumera says about cutting:
QUOTE
Cut grade is the most important factor in determining the overall appearance of a diamond, because a poorly cut diamond will seem dull even with excellent clarity and color. Conversely, a well cut diamond can have a slightly lower color (G-H) or clarity (SI1-SI2) and still look quite beautiful, due to its superior ability to create sparkle and brilliance.
See how Martin (Jewellery Expert) says about cutting:
QUOTE
Cut is the most important factor affecting a diamond's beauty and cost, and can also affect its durability. Sparkle and brilliance are determined by the cutting, because it is the cutting that affects the way light travels through the stone, how much is reflected back to the eye, and how much "leaks" out the back.
I agree to the controversial either colour should be prioritised is very
subjective but take cutting as last consideration is very
surely misleading.
Have you ever seen the perfect brilliance small stone before?
This post has been edited by Nobita_lam: Mar 26 2015, 11:26 PM