I have thought of a way to bypass the shaping but haven't tested it. Wait for my news.
How to bypass TMNet torrent shaping / throttling?, NEWBIE - Read 1st Post
How to bypass TMNet torrent shaping / throttling?, NEWBIE - Read 1st Post
|
|
Oct 3 2006, 09:10 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
I have thought of a way to bypass the shaping but haven't tested it. Wait for my news.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 3 2006, 11:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
Alright fellas, i have tested the solution that i mentioned before. It may be not a very good news.
I believe in the past few days my BT download rate has never reached 8 KBps. After i tried the solution, i only managed to get the max. speed of 20 KBps . So, I consider it as not a very viable solution as it takes a lot of resources and i read that azureus user can get up to 50 KBps using LAN leech feature. Result might be different with your experiment though. Info : - The software is still in testing mode, it's called TOR (The Onion Router) - I'm running it on P3 550 Mhz machine with 128 MB RAM. |
|
|
Oct 4 2006, 12:23 AM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(kramuse @ Oct 4 2006, 12:17 AM) What is the speed you're getting? I'm connecting to mostly international peers and getting around 15 KBps in average.Ups, i just read your post. Seems like better use azureus, doesn't it? Forgot to tell that I'm using utorrent 1.6. This post has been edited by virtual: Oct 4 2006, 12:26 AM |
|
|
Oct 4 2006, 12:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
|
|
|
Oct 4 2006, 09:18 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
Hi guys, the TOR software is unstable at least on my machine. After a few hours, it crashed and I'm back to the shitty speed < 5 KBps. I might try the unix version later on pessimistly.
This post has been edited by virtual: Oct 4 2006, 09:19 AM |
|
|
Oct 7 2006, 01:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 12 2006, 04:06 PM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
Honestly, I actually thought of providing VPN access for people who wants to download faster. But the poll thread regarding secure tunneling discouraged me to do so. Too less clients, I'll be bankrupt in few months as I have to rent datacentre outside Malaysia which doesn't throttle P2P traffic. LOL.
This post has been edited by virtual: Oct 12 2006, 04:07 PM |
|
|
Oct 12 2006, 04:34 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(ocdetective @ Oct 12 2006, 04:13 PM) Virtual, based on the prices I have seen for dedicated server host - you could get together say 10 people and split the cost and would work out at less than $5USD per month (from a German server). Are you sure about that? I couldn't find a dedicated connection + server rental for < USD 150 a month. If I charge fellas here for USD 10, I still need > 15 people.I am taking my own route at the moment which is ST and as a backup looking at using a secure shell and tunneling through to it using puTTY with my bittorrent client using the secure shell address as proxy. |
|
|
Oct 12 2006, 04:36 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(tangent709 @ Oct 12 2006, 04:22 PM) Using a shell account would probably give you more long-term consistent speeds than the 3rd party tunnel services that have been discussed. Any recommendations for an affordable host? We're not talking about 3rd party tunnel services but a dedicated server which we configure ourselves. |
|
|
Oct 13 2006, 04:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(work_tgr @ Oct 12 2006, 04:41 PM) too less clients ?? If you can find me a dedicated server rental with unmetered bandwidth and allow P2P traffic for < $50 (with free setup fee), then I'll do it. If you can gather > 40 ppl then the rental can be ~$200. no at all. people are crazy for bt. without bt, life is meanless. TM will gonna BLOCK bt once and forever. bt fans will definite agree to pay more ( but with reasonable price around usd5 per month). if you can provide a REAL SUCCESSFUL tunnel to bypass TM's throttle for 24 hour maximum speed + unlimited download. I will be your first customer and follow by thousand/million others |
|
|
Oct 31 2006, 04:55 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
Can someone find confirmation regarding the shaping whether permanent or temporarily until end of the year?
|
|
|
Oct 31 2006, 05:18 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
If really going to be permanent then i'll work something out soon. Otherwise, it'd be useless.
|
|
|
Nov 6 2006, 04:13 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
As far as i know, there's no possible way to know whether normal or p2p traffic is running inside a secure tunnel. TMNet can of course cap the tunnel but that means corporate users who use secure tunneling technology to transfer their data will be affected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 6 2006, 05:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(tirumisu @ Nov 6 2006, 05:05 PM) Well you see problem is very few companies use VPN to send large amounts of data.Even for banks a dedicated dual channel 128kbps ISDN line will work for transfering databases across branches.Of course more is better. What you were saying is right. But, do they have the right to do so? I meant who knows what the VPN users doing. If they transfer large data for research, who knows? Is it legal to do so?The VPN just works like a pipe.Virtual as it implies, it creates a non physical pipe/tunnel/connection between you and the secure server.It's basically a proxy so at the end of the day it still depends on TMnet's network to connect you to the overseas server.Data that is being send across the connection established between you and the server is encrypted.The only benefit that you'll get is that the data is only between you and the tuneling service provider.They'll provide the necessary connection to the servers/peers you request to connect to and send it back to you over the secured link without your isp,the government and 3rd parties from knowing unless they are capable of intercepting these packets. Earlier we used this tunneling service because it could hide P2P packets from being detected by TMnet's P2P filtering solution.But it's a matter of time before they'll notice about the high bandwidth/traffic of users connecting to these secure tunneling servers.All they have to do is to shape the connection speed to these server ips and poof! we get throttled once again.Even if your tunneling service client can establish multiple connections back to its server, you're back to square one when your overseas connection is limited. |
|
|
Nov 6 2006, 07:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
That's exactly my point. TMNet not supposed to throttle VPN but hell, who knows what will they do next.
|
|
|
Nov 7 2006, 03:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
One thing though, how come some areas are not throttled yet? Cyberjaya you can only get 5-8 KBps
|
|
|
Nov 8 2006, 08:12 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(Haruji Sora @ Nov 7 2006, 03:25 PM) Bcoz TMNet is thorttling all those high bandwidth use areas first, and never bother with those area that has low broadband penetrations (yes this CONTRDICT on what they say distrubuting it equally) Good explanation. I think Cyberjaya is one of the area throttled first. It's even nearer to their office/centre. |
|
|
Nov 9 2006, 11:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
If you guys can gather USD 200 / month, i can setup a fast and stable vpn for you. It'd be based on OpenVPN, not lousy PPTP nor L2TP. The server would be in Europe with unmetered 100 Mbps connection. For optimum performance, you all shouldn't be more than 20 people. Payment has to be made in 3 months period as i don't have money to cover for you all.
This post has been edited by virtual: Nov 9 2006, 11:18 PM |
|
|
Nov 10 2006, 12:43 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
|
|
|
Nov 10 2006, 02:58 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
329 posts Joined: Jan 2006 |
QUOTE(awyongcarl @ Nov 9 2006, 11:43 PM) Or if you have a dedicated server which doesn't throttle bittorrent also can. You gather users, manage $$$ and everything, i just need superuser account, flexibility in choosing the OS and creating my own vpn accounts. Fair enough? This post has been edited by virtual: Nov 10 2006, 02:59 PM |
| Change to: | 0.0242sec
0.68
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 27th November 2025 - 05:31 PM |