QUOTE(Jasoncat @ Apr 18 2015, 10:38 AM)
Samkor, impressed
prof really pro 
Oh yeah, I missed out MBB which I believe it uses blended COF (the actual COF) instead of KLIBOR as its reference. So its BR rate is supposed to be closer to FD/CASA. Theoretically, banks like MBB that uses blended COF may see relatively less volatility in their BR as its liability components which comprises FD will be repriced slower. This implies 2 things - if OPR hikes, then its BR will adjust up slower / smaller and vice versa. Nevertheless, since I / we do not have the privy access to their BR computation methodology, I presume the BR adjustment is elastic and timely to reflect the change in some key reference rate, eg OPR which will have widespread effect to all the funding cost.
For banks that have effective cost control this will give them more room to play around with their spread and remain competitive in the market.
As for your presumption stated in the 2nd part of your note, in terms of quantum different banks will have different amount of statutory funds to be kept but same rate 4% applied across all banks. Naturally banks with higher eligible liability will have higher funds to be reserved for that regulatory purpose. But again, how significant is the weightage of it in BR calculatotion will depend on the methodology used by each banks.
Excellent piece of info... Gain some new knowledge today... Oh yeah, I missed out MBB which I believe it uses blended COF (the actual COF) instead of KLIBOR as its reference. So its BR rate is supposed to be closer to FD/CASA. Theoretically, banks like MBB that uses blended COF may see relatively less volatility in their BR as its liability components which comprises FD will be repriced slower. This implies 2 things - if OPR hikes, then its BR will adjust up slower / smaller and vice versa. Nevertheless, since I / we do not have the privy access to their BR computation methodology, I presume the BR adjustment is elastic and timely to reflect the change in some key reference rate, eg OPR which will have widespread effect to all the funding cost.
For banks that have effective cost control this will give them more room to play around with their spread and remain competitive in the market.
As for your presumption stated in the 2nd part of your note, in terms of quantum different banks will have different amount of statutory funds to be kept but same rate 4% applied across all banks. Naturally banks with higher eligible liability will have higher funds to be reserved for that regulatory purpose. But again, how significant is the weightage of it in BR calculatotion will depend on the methodology used by each banks.
Based on this, it is hard to preclude me assuming Jason gor profession is in finance/actuarial science...
Apr 18 2015, 11:36 AM

Quote
0.0281sec
0.52
6 queries
GZIP Disabled