QUOTE(Intergalactic @ Jun 29 2017, 03:56 PM)
The question arises:
People tend to use the Islamic rules such as no non-halal foods, no alcohol, no filthy animals, etc as reference when describing the Datuk (Malay).
Because people assuming that Datuk is a deceased Malay person's spirit whose faith in Islam and thinking that the Datuk still practising it, am I right?
Then why are people simply ignored some very important concepts in Islam, like a Muslim MUST ONLY serves to one God (Allah S.W.T) and there is no other than Him?
Islam strictly prohibited deification of any human being. According to the Islamic teaching without question, the establishment of "partners" placed beside God is a great sin. The God in Islam (Allah S.W.T) may forgive any sin sorely except for this one.
So will a deceased Muslim person's spirit defy the teaching which he has practised for his entire life before and after his death?
I personally don't think so. Therefore, I highly doubt that the Datuk is a deceased Malay person's spirit.
This is an interesting question, I've also wondered the same. It's like the nature of the non-halal, no alcohol rule of Datuk is very contradictory because if the Datuk is Islam, then he cannot be the same entity that would become a deity, and if he has become a deity, why would he still believe in Islam because what he is now is against the very teachings of Islam. Unless Sufi Islam is something entirely different?
Hope this does not come off as offensive, I'm just curious.