QUOTE(camper_davidyong @ Jan 28 2015, 03:52 PM)
Hi Boss, I ain't no pro driver. Haven't run at Sepang, Genting and etc. I'm just a local ppl travel from Sban-KL-Sban daily. What is the point if a lab tells you that this is fine but at your end, after driving hard/hot, the gear becomes hard to shift? It takes away all the fun of driving a stick. It's all about the feel. I change to this gear oil from the OEM ones because just like your case, the gears become harder to shift/not smooth after sprinted driving and this is dangerous because after you exit the Lekas toll heading towards Sban, there is a long sweeping high speed corner and the S'ss Mantin Hill roads. If you stuck in one gear and downshift slower by a bit, hamkachan adi.
FYI, this gear oil is recommended by my rally driver friend to counter this problem. Gear oil performs differently from engine oil. Lower range viscosity doesn't mean better and I know you prefer 0-20W for EO but I'm using Mobil1 5-50. It all depends on driver's driving style (one might prefer to up shift faster while some might prefer to pull until the last rpm) and the type of road one drives in. F1 wont use rally-cross lubricants for example.
Cheers.

i think you're having some misunderstanding here.
the hard to shift part is only after my KL > Singapore (one time) Singapore > KL (another time)
in which after the oil cooled down, everything returned to normal.
and imho keeping the car over 220km/h for over an hour isn't something one should (or can do) do all the time.
unless you're going to such serious driving (umm, assume you go 220 for 9 minutes at lekas la, that's still not 1 hour ya) you really have no reason to require much thicker viscosity gear oil.
and at the end of the day, i'm trying to point out to you GL6 gear oils are NOT suitable for our F5MBB gear box.
that's the bottom line story thicker or thinner viscosity aside.
Torco themselves have never specifically mentioned their SGO being compatible to soft/yellow metals as well that are friendly for synchronizers.
It's not a matter of lower viscosity or higher viscosity being better or worse.
not even a matter of style or rally or F1.
not even a matter of how fast (or slow) one shifts.
i'm not even a professional driver (i certainly make 0 cents from my track driving) to begin with much less a F1 driver.
It's merely following specifications that Mitsubishi specified . (you know, the guys who spent years/billions in R&D etc and i think they should know their car/parts better than any of us)
another FYI, i'm pretty new in driving manual, and i've sat in low gears oftenly be it lazy or noob to shift, so you can imagine the amount of fuel cuts bouncing off the 7k+ rpm meter point.
Then there's the huge amount of gear grinds i've done to the gearbox and from what the report i've seen, the wear is still surprisingly not as high as expected.
again, higher (or more expensive) does not necessarily mean better.