A lot of people were quick to label rafa having problems (failure) at napoli at the beginning of the season. lost 2/3 at the league start, bundled out of CL. guess what, napoli bounce back, 3rd in the league, 5 consecutive games won, napolifc owners are happy with him & offered an extension of another 2 years (Of which rafa declined, something to do about missing his family in liverpool, of course the press quickly jumped in to add fuel to fire)
Bringing in De Boer, koeman, klopp means we are going back to square one (to where rodgers began, that's throwing 3 years down).
I'm in Rodgers camp, i don't quite agree with all his selections for the team, team tactics/strategy is not and no where near to top four (managers) despite almost winning it last season. He will learn, I hope he does for the sake of sustaining liverpool for the long run.
and if hypothetically should rodgers step down, i would like a old liverpool friend we have in rafa. he knows the city, he knows kopites, he breathes and lives like scourser.
writer below is pretty much like you bitebug not exactly willing to give rafa another shot (speaking hypothetically that If)
PRos & cons of having Rafa back the article above cited Dalglish second spell at liverpool was not a success. While in definition it might not be a fairy tale success, I don't it was a complete disaster at all. technically Lfc won more with dalglish than of rodgers. Yet many have praised rodgers for bringing
Liverpool back to the way it used to be. They way we played and all.
Well, whichever camp you're on, if the team keep getting bad results, sooner or later someone has to answer for it. And we all know who it's going to be. I don't think our American owners are very patient people.
Daglish's demise came from the fact that we failed to qualify for CL, and that he spent a lot of dough while at it. We all can pretty much expect the same thing to happen to Rodgers should we not qualify for CL this season.