Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Beginner Lens Recommendation, Canon EOS DSLR 700D

views
     
-kytz-
post Nov 2 2014, 08:19 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,573 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
QUOTE(supersound @ Nov 2 2014, 07:08 AM)
Nope, because I see most people here will follow what you says.
If you still insist that skill is all, then you shall :
1. use kit lens to take close ups instead of prime lens.
2. use point to shoot for general works.
I won't really want to dig down to your "superior" skills(no point), but still, you are using different lens for different purpose, right?
*
Since when did he say SKILL IS ALL?

Stop putting words into people's mouth and learn to understand and read people's posts here properly.

sweat.gif doh.gif shakehead.gif
kenary820
post Nov 2 2014, 08:55 AM

~(**)~
******
Senior Member
1,862 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
Stick with kitlens..I have tried the stm version and its wonderful..buy speedlight + light modifier - portrait and tripod instead.If still have extra spend on landscape filter like gnd and nd filter.
vankodoq
post Nov 2 2014, 09:05 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
377 posts

Joined: Oct 2013


QUOTE(Cha3m @ Oct 30 2014, 07:36 PM)
Hey,

So Im currently using a Canon EOS DSLR 700D with its standard lens (18-55mm EFS STM).

Im thinking of selling it and get a new lens.

Usage;
-Landscape
-Portrait (Single and group)

Please help recommend me a BANG-4-BUCKS lens,
Below RM800 (Or within that range so I can buy a 2nd hand)
*
Skipping through the arguments here, I'd go with the first comment by goldfries. That 18-55mm STM kit lens should be alright for your intended use. If you're alright with second-hand, then Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 (approx. RM800-900, used) might also be a good lens, IMHO. Haven't really tried a wide-angle lens, so can't comment on that. hmm.gif

This post has been edited by vankodoq: Nov 2 2014, 09:05 AM
mingyuyu
post Nov 2 2014, 09:50 AM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


goldfries shootkk

We really should just ignore that guy, he's so full of himself thinking he is all right and we are all wrong whistling.gif

Cannot take macro with kit lens? What if I say I did? Following 4 shots taken using EosM+22mm kit lens, RM1k combo. If I can, what says you? I am not even a professional, just a hobbyist.

user posted image


user posted image


user posted image


user posted image



and took with 18-135mm + 550D, rm2k combo.

user posted image


user posted image

laugh.gif



[PF] T.J.
post Nov 2 2014, 12:12 PM

20k VIP Club
Group Icon
Elite
24,193 posts

Joined: Feb 2010
From: Perak
QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Nov 2 2014, 09:50 AM)
goldfries shootkk

We really should just ignore that guy, he's so full of himself thinking he is all right and we are all wrong  whistling.gif

Cannot take macro with kit lens? What if I say I did? Following 4 shots taken using EosM+22mm kit lens, RM1k combo. If I can, what says you? I am not even a professional, just a hobbyist.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

laugh.gif
*
Try reversing your kitlens bro haha.. can get even closer brows.gif
Rice_Owl84
post Nov 2 2014, 12:36 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
603 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(mingyuyu @ Nov 2 2014, 09:50 AM)
goldfries shootkk

We really should just ignore that guy, he's so full of himself thinking he is all right and we are all wrong  whistling.gif

Cannot take macro with kit lens? What if I say I did? Following 4 shots taken using EosM+22mm kit lens, RM1k combo. If I can, what says you? I am not even a professional, just a hobbyist.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

laugh.gif
*
The Canon 18-55mm through the BHPhoto site, the specs says it can do 1:3 macro without addon filters and tubes. I didn't know that til later when another forum says how good of a macro capability it can achieve.
mingyuyu
post Nov 2 2014, 01:20 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(PF T.J. @ Nov 2 2014, 12:12 PM)
Try reversing your kitlens bro haha.. can get even closer brows.gif
*
QUOTE(Rice_Owl84 @ Nov 2 2014, 12:36 PM)
The Canon 18-55mm through the BHPhoto site, the specs says it can do 1:3 macro without addon filters and tubes.  I didn't know that til later when another forum says how good of a macro capability it can achieve.
*
yalah, those are cheap lenses, so what? I can still create good quality photos that are acceptable.

PF t.J. I did that with my 50mm before, but dark viewfinder is really hard to use, super sharp images though from that setup since the 50mm is sharp at f8 already.
Ask_Yip
post Nov 3 2014, 09:11 AM

Retired Audiophiles
*******
Senior Member
2,864 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
From: NoWhere
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Corrections, he said close-up, not macro. biggrin.gif
onghy
post Nov 3 2014, 11:27 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
395 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
browsing thru this topic really make me lolz..... TS ask for lens recommendation and come out with so many funny things

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

1st of all, why u want to look for new lens? what you not happy with the 18-55mm?

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


1. why use prime lens to take so called close up? that never a must
2. who tell u DSLR is a must for those purpose?

This post has been edited by onghy: Nov 3 2014, 11:28 AM
SUSsupersound
post Nov 3 2014, 01:54 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
11,554 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(onghy @ Nov 3 2014, 11:27 AM)
browsing thru this topic really make me lolz..... TS ask for lens recommendation and come out with so many funny things

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

1st of all, why u want to look for new lens? what you not happy with the 18-55mm?

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


1. why use prime lens to take so called close up? that never a must
2. who tell u DSLR is a must for those purpose?
*
Already have a joker posted his 15/16 photos to justify the limitations of a lens.
As I said before, everything is created with a purpose. Like you purposely quote me just to insult me.
fun_feng
post Nov 3 2014, 02:55 PM

One Cat to Rule Them ALL
*******
Senior Member
2,289 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Stairway to Heaven
Just my thoughts on this, there are a few main attributes when choosing a lens

1. Image quality - Generally speaking, this is not very important. Any decent lens kit lens included will produce sufficient quality for small print/internet/pc viewing.
2. Focal length - DUH, this of course is the first criteria of a lens
UWA - This is not a "cram it all into a scene" lens. UWA is supposed to get close to the action lens. Excellent for landscape pics that has foreground for better depth. Great also couple pics that blends into landscape.
portrait - Generally for focal length above 70mm as they create less distortion, but your creativity is your limit
3. Fast lens - Fast lens actually is getting less of importance actually. With higher ISO usability and IS, low light capture is easier. Also, you really should consider flash photography is light is a concern.
4. Bokeh - Actually I view bokeh as one of the tricks/guide for photography like rules of third, leading line etc... Very useful for portraiture because it's easier to use.

Anything else? I can't think of now. But REALLY the best lens for a beginner is a kit lens (zoom lens 18-55 etc..)
onghy
post Nov 3 2014, 03:37 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
395 posts

Joined: Apr 2011
QUOTE(supersound @ Nov 3 2014, 01:54 PM)
Already have a joker posted his 15/16 photos to justify the limitations of a lens.
As I said before, everything is created with a purpose. Like you purposely quote me just to insult me.
*
whatever, if you think you the correct one, and ppl here are insulting you by not agree with your point
closed, i wont reply you anymore

QUOTE(fun_feng @ Nov 3 2014, 02:55 PM)
Just my thoughts on this, there are a few main attributes when choosing a lens

1. Image quality - Generally speaking, this is not very important. Any decent lens kit lens included will produce sufficient quality for small print/internet/pc viewing.
2. Focal length - DUH, this of course is the first criteria of a lens
    UWA - This is not a "cram it all into a scene" lens. UWA is supposed to get close to the action lens. Excellent for landscape pics that has foreground for better depth. Great also couple pics that blends into landscape.
    portrait - Generally for focal length above 70mm as they create less distortion, but your creativity is your limit
3. Fast lens - Fast lens actually is getting less of importance actually. With higher ISO usability and IS, low light capture is easier. Also, you really should consider flash photography is light is a concern.
4. Bokeh - Actually I view bokeh as one of the tricks/guide for photography like rules of third, leading line etc... Very useful for portraiture because it's easier to use.

Anything else? I can't think of now. But REALLY the best lens for a beginner is a kit lens (zoom lens 18-55 etc..)
*
there are more factors to consider, the weight of the lens, size of the lens, ur budget, lens distortion...
bokeh actually is a by product of wide aperture and focal length, we cant eliminate it, so we include bokeh in composition. a lot of time, bokeh will cause failure to a picture

This post has been edited by onghy: Nov 3 2014, 04:07 PM
mingyuyu
post Nov 3 2014, 06:12 PM

B A N N E D
Group Icon
Elite
3,249 posts

Joined: Oct 2011


QUOTE(Ask_Yip @ Nov 3 2014, 09:11 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Corrections, he said close-up, not macro. biggrin.gif
*
Kinda same thing, depends on how you call it.

Funny to see when everyone is against you yet you call others joker instead of asking yourself if you did anything wrong, what kind of attitude is this. laugh.gif
SUSCha3m
post Nov 3 2014, 08:01 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
88 posts

Joined: Sep 2012
Okay thanks, will compile the recommended lens and refer to it later (Except the no zoom one, not looking for that kind).



3 Pages < 1 2 3Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0171sec    0.76    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 05:47 PM