Nov 6 2014, 09:40 AM
QUOTE(jolokia @ Nov 6 2014, 08:54 AM)
http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysi...ise-study-shows
Wage, property inequality in Malaysia on the rise, study shows BY ANISAH SHUKRY Published: 5 November 2014
November 5, 2014.
Wealth is concentrating in the already affluent as inequality in property and earnings in Malaysia are rising, a joint study by Universiti Malaya (UM) and the Khazanah Research Institute has found. The study covered the private and public sector, and showed that data from the official Household Income Survey (HIS) yielded opposite findings when compared with data on private sector salaries, public sector employment and the National Property Information Centre (Napic). UM's Dr Lee Hwok Aun and Khazanah's Dr Muhammed Abdul Khalid found that while the HIS reported a decline in inequality of gross household income, the other data sources showed that inequality in terms of personal earnings and house ownership was increasing.
"We find evidence that inequality is growing in earnings in both the private and public sectors and increasingly concentrated at the topmost strata," Muhammed told a seminar titled "Has inequality in Malaysia really gone down?" in UM today. "In terms of wealth ownership, there is also rising inequality in property ownership." According to data from the Employees Provident Fund (EPF), the largest retirement fund in Malaysia, the Gini Coefficient of the savings accounts had risen from 0.643 in 2004 to 0.661 in 2013, the researchers said. (The Gini Coefficient Index measures the distribution of income in a certain country. According to the HIS, the Gini Coefficient of Malaysia's gross household income in 2012 was 0.43.) "The savings of the bottom half of EPF account holders has fallen from 2004 to 2013, while there is a slight increase in concentration at the top 1%," said Dr Lee, a senior lecturer with UM's Department of Developmental Studies. The salaries of workers aged 26-35 had also grown at slower rates from 2004 to 2013, and lagged behind the earnings of those above 40 years of age, they said.
Meanwhile, in the public sector, the rank of managers and professionals have expanded disproportionately faster from 1999 to 2012, according to their compilation from the Employment List of Ministries and Departments in the Estimated Federal Budget. "There is a concentration in the uppermost positions, which is similar to the findings from the EPF. The top management enjoys higher income," said Lee. In 1999, the top management comprised 0.09% of the staff, while the management and professionals made up 14.07% of the staff. But in 2012, 0.17% of the staff were top management and 29.80% were of the management and professionals. "The disparity between the top 10% and bottom% may have increased," said Lee. The researchers said the Gini Coefficient of residential properties sold a year had also increased from 0.51 in 1996 to 0.53 in 2011, according to their calculations based on data from Napic. "The value of property purchased by high-end buyers has grown more rapidly than property purchased by low-end buyers throughout the years," said Muhammed.
The share of total property value by the bottom 20% from 2006 to 2011 has remained stagnant at 5%, while the top 10% have enjoyed a growth from 35% to 40% of total shares during the same period, according to the data. The researchers also said that passenger vehicle sales data show increasing proportions of luxury cars from 2001 to 2011. "There is a rising share of vehicles sold at the high end and bottom end, and rapid growth in luxury brands and compact cars," said Lee. Data from private unit trust funds such as Amanah Saham Berhad showed that the majority own very little and have seen their shares declining from 2007 to 2012, said Muhammed. The shares of the bottom 50% of ASB shareholders has dropped from 3% to 2%, while the 80th to 90th percentile have seen an increase from 76% to 77% share ownership from 2007 to 2012, according to the researchers. But the researchers noted that according to the HIS, household income inequality has been on a downward trend since 2004.
"The HIS states that Malaysia's Gini Coefficient of gross household income shrank 0.84% per year from 2004 to 2012, while in the 2000s, the bottom 40% enjoyed relatively higher income growth," said Lee. The researchers suggested that the disparity between the HIS and their own study may be due to the fact that the HIS did not take into account the earnings of each individual in a household. "The HIS reports the aggregate gross household income. There is no distinction between earned income and gross income," said Lee. "Gross household income inequality may be declining while personal earnings inequality rises due to transfers and multiple income earners in a household." – November 5, 2014. -
Bear2 see what i mean ? Didn't i told you this long before this studies ? The rich sibeh rich can afford to buy more & more to keep, 80% bottom earner is no relevant to support the property price, they can go fly kite as far as developer concern, nobody care if they can afford those 400-800K property, they are like BMW, Benz, Audi, Ferrari, Posh don't care if 95% average income earner can afford their car or not.
"The value of property purchased by high-end buyers has grown more rapidly than property purchased by low-end buyers throughout the years," 
.
Bear2, SonicKim88, Ice Cream MX, Lalat Dern (Eat your heart out)..
they will mention everyting under the sky but nth related to:Wage, property inequality in Malaysia on the rise, study shows BY ANISAH SHUKRY Published: 5 November 2014
November 5, 2014.
Wealth is concentrating in the already affluent as inequality in property and earnings in Malaysia are rising, a joint study by Universiti Malaya (UM) and the Khazanah Research Institute has found. The study covered the private and public sector, and showed that data from the official Household Income Survey (HIS) yielded opposite findings when compared with data on private sector salaries, public sector employment and the National Property Information Centre (Napic). UM's Dr Lee Hwok Aun and Khazanah's Dr Muhammed Abdul Khalid found that while the HIS reported a decline in inequality of gross household income, the other data sources showed that inequality in terms of personal earnings and house ownership was increasing.
"We find evidence that inequality is growing in earnings in both the private and public sectors and increasingly concentrated at the topmost strata," Muhammed told a seminar titled "Has inequality in Malaysia really gone down?" in UM today. "In terms of wealth ownership, there is also rising inequality in property ownership." According to data from the Employees Provident Fund (EPF), the largest retirement fund in Malaysia, the Gini Coefficient of the savings accounts had risen from 0.643 in 2004 to 0.661 in 2013, the researchers said. (The Gini Coefficient Index measures the distribution of income in a certain country. According to the HIS, the Gini Coefficient of Malaysia's gross household income in 2012 was 0.43.) "The savings of the bottom half of EPF account holders has fallen from 2004 to 2013, while there is a slight increase in concentration at the top 1%," said Dr Lee, a senior lecturer with UM's Department of Developmental Studies. The salaries of workers aged 26-35 had also grown at slower rates from 2004 to 2013, and lagged behind the earnings of those above 40 years of age, they said.
Meanwhile, in the public sector, the rank of managers and professionals have expanded disproportionately faster from 1999 to 2012, according to their compilation from the Employment List of Ministries and Departments in the Estimated Federal Budget. "There is a concentration in the uppermost positions, which is similar to the findings from the EPF. The top management enjoys higher income," said Lee. In 1999, the top management comprised 0.09% of the staff, while the management and professionals made up 14.07% of the staff. But in 2012, 0.17% of the staff were top management and 29.80% were of the management and professionals. "The disparity between the top 10% and bottom% may have increased," said Lee. The researchers said the Gini Coefficient of residential properties sold a year had also increased from 0.51 in 1996 to 0.53 in 2011, according to their calculations based on data from Napic. "The value of property purchased by high-end buyers has grown more rapidly than property purchased by low-end buyers throughout the years," said Muhammed.
The share of total property value by the bottom 20% from 2006 to 2011 has remained stagnant at 5%, while the top 10% have enjoyed a growth from 35% to 40% of total shares during the same period, according to the data. The researchers also said that passenger vehicle sales data show increasing proportions of luxury cars from 2001 to 2011. "There is a rising share of vehicles sold at the high end and bottom end, and rapid growth in luxury brands and compact cars," said Lee. Data from private unit trust funds such as Amanah Saham Berhad showed that the majority own very little and have seen their shares declining from 2007 to 2012, said Muhammed. The shares of the bottom 50% of ASB shareholders has dropped from 3% to 2%, while the 80th to 90th percentile have seen an increase from 76% to 77% share ownership from 2007 to 2012, according to the researchers. But the researchers noted that according to the HIS, household income inequality has been on a downward trend since 2004.
"The HIS states that Malaysia's Gini Coefficient of gross household income shrank 0.84% per year from 2004 to 2012, while in the 2000s, the bottom 40% enjoyed relatively higher income growth," said Lee. The researchers suggested that the disparity between the HIS and their own study may be due to the fact that the HIS did not take into account the earnings of each individual in a household. "The HIS reports the aggregate gross household income. There is no distinction between earned income and gross income," said Lee. "Gross household income inequality may be declining while personal earnings inequality rises due to transfers and multiple income earners in a household." – November 5, 2014. -
Bear2 see what i mean ? Didn't i told you this long before this studies ? The rich sibeh rich can afford to buy more & more to keep, 80% bottom earner is no relevant to support the property price, they can go fly kite as far as developer concern, nobody care if they can afford those 400-800K property, they are like BMW, Benz, Audi, Ferrari, Posh don't care if 95% average income earner can afford their car or not.
"The value of property purchased by high-end buyers has grown more rapidly than property purchased by low-end buyers throughout the years," .Bear2, SonicKim88, Ice Cream MX, Lalat Dern (Eat your heart out)..
a) transaction slow down
b) demands lowered (confirmed by junior investors)
c) Bank measures are tightening
d) developers suffering slowdown and loan rejection for new launches
e) developers unable to sell of all units even VP has handed (Oug parklane, altitude 236, sky vista residency, taman pertama, goodview @ sg long 2.5 storey category, taming mutiara 3, strands of projects in mont kiara , cheras heights and etc)
f) sub-sales newly vp ( too long a list, there are 1 year vp list, 2 year vp list, favourite example Amaya & GT 208) and etc
g) the cooling measures (further enhanced)
all these were not within those years when they invested, now they still say 5-6 years ago, they mention only... to boost market.. they know this is over and not the same anymore, thus they are interested in cashing out.. some maybe rental.. the target is of course not mature areas like klcc, mk and etc.. those areas are not related even they bubble also not the major concern..
on the other hand they acknowledge no more superbull run, only left with 5-10% bull run (some jokers say inflation, if inflation property so high,)
they actually know what they are doing...
Quote
0.0513sec
0.43
7 queries
GZIP Disabled