Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
9 Pages « < 5 6 7 8 9 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Steam Steam Promotion, Discussion and FAQ Thread V46

views
     
TSCheesenium
post Nov 3 2014, 08:19 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(memphiz_zero88 @ Nov 3 2014, 07:46 PM)
there will always be hackers, doesn't matter what game. those with leaderboards are more proned to hackers like Pacman Championship Edition DX. you can check the #1 score and see the replay, you'll facepalm all the way brows.gif
*
I know but was it as bad as MW2 days where almost every game got hackers? BO1 improved a bit but in freeweekends of other games, its hard to determine cause there are so many new players.
TSCheesenium
post Nov 3 2014, 08:28 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(pikachu01 @ Nov 3 2014, 08:18 PM)
4X games are more time consuming for me as 4X have victory conditions. Grand Strategy games end on a certain date. Like EU4 it's 1800s and you can quit anytime as well. Also you can start at any time as well.
*
I dont think so. Other than Civ V, most 4X can be completed to 3-6 hours on default setting. That isnt too long for me. At the same time, they are a lot easier to learn with better UI in general so I dont have to spend 50 hours to learn how to play a grand strategy. Most 4X are simple enough to learn as you go while if you vaguely know how 4X works, you pretty much can play a lot of 4X in the market as most of them copies Civ V's UI and style.

I dont stay for the victory conditions. Some times, I just quit when I am starting to steam roll them considering most 4X has pretty dumb AI.

Also, I am not a fan of history, especially medieval or earlier so grand strategy at the moment isnt for me.

This post has been edited by Cheesenium: Nov 3 2014, 08:30 PM
TSCheesenium
post Nov 3 2014, 08:29 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(Blackops981 @ Nov 3 2014, 08:22 PM)
MW2's hacker problem isn't as bad as blackops.

Surprisingly there were more hackers in BO compared to MW2 despite the introduction of theatre mode.
*
Still, how was BO2 and Ghost, if you had played them recently?
TSCheesenium
post Nov 3 2014, 08:34 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(Blackops981 @ Nov 3 2014, 08:31 PM)
Barely touched ghost, BO2 is smg fest
*
lawl. How about hackers in BO2? Are there a lot?
TSCheesenium
post Nov 3 2014, 08:38 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(Blackops981 @ Nov 3 2014, 08:36 PM)
quite a few when it first launched, haven't played it in a long time tho
*
Hmm, might just skip AW then. Considering VC is coming out a week after that and Elite Dangerous is announcing their release date soon.
TSCheesenium
post Nov 3 2014, 09:09 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(domo_kun @ Nov 3 2014, 09:02 PM)
eh, suddenly i thought... Titanfall is a multi-player game only? or is it like CoD; solo and multi-player?  laugh.gif
*
Titanfall is only multiplayer. No SP campaign.
TSCheesenium
post Nov 3 2014, 09:14 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(Razortooth @ Nov 3 2014, 09:02 PM)
user posted image
*
What? You didnt know our moderator was only 10 years old?

shakehead.gif
TSCheesenium
post Nov 3 2014, 10:02 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(pikachu01 @ Nov 3 2014, 09:50 PM)
I actually learned to play in under 5 hours for EU4. It's not that hard. Besides, depending on how you're playing 4X, it can be done the same with Grand Strategy games as well. But the difference is, you can't really steamroll in Grand Strategy games. Hence why I'm not playing 4x games anymore. Too boring with predictable outcomes and dumb AI.
*
Im sorry, I am uninterested in grand strategy at the moment. The dull UI, history heavy setting and the steep learning curve isnt for me at all. It just feels like you are giving a vibe that 4X is inferior to grand strategy in the same way how a sim racer looks down on people who play NFS. Feels like grand strategy is great while 4X are garbage these days.

This post has been edited by Cheesenium: Nov 3 2014, 10:03 PM
TSCheesenium
post Nov 3 2014, 10:51 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(pikachu01 @ Nov 3 2014, 10:18 PM)
The UI is pretty dull, that's for sure. No denying that actually. However get past the UI you'll find the history setting mind-f*kin-blowing. Like how playing Japan, you conquer Ming (in EU4) or Qing (in Victoria 2) or doing the dissolving the Holy Roman Empire with France, or playing UK and colonizing the heck out of Africa. The opposite can happen as well when playing Malacca (with Ayuthyya raining blows on you) or playing US and having the British knocking on your door every few decades.

The steep learning curve, I agree. However like other games such as Kerbal Space Program or Prison Architect which have ~3-5 hours of learning curve. You got to agree that those games are legendary when it comes to the enjoyment you get vs cut and dry 4X.

When talking about 4X, it's usually Civ V and recently Civ BE. With Civ V, you can still take in the historical setting. But Civ BE lost it, hence you got to agree that historicity of a game is quite important.
*
Maybe other 4X is dry and boring for you but please keep the arrogance to yourself. Dont have to shit on 4X here because you think grand strategy is superior.


This post has been edited by Cheesenium: Nov 3 2014, 10:52 PM
TSCheesenium
post Nov 3 2014, 11:02 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(pikachu01 @ Nov 3 2014, 10:53 PM)
Umm, the AI in 4X games being dumb is already a known fact. I didn't say that people who play 4X are dumb did I?

Please keep your misbegotten communication errors to yourself, thank you.
*
Pretty much only Civ V had terrible AI. Gal Civ 2, Sword of the Stars, Age of Wonders 3 and Endless Space AI was usable. The way you are writing, you are implying that people who play Civ are people who enjoy "inferior" games are retarded to your "superior" grand strategy. Ie, this line:

QUOTE
You got to agree that those games are legendary when it comes to the enjoyment you get vs cut and dry 4X.


And I never agree that grand strategy was any better than Civ V. Maybe it is dry for you but you do not have shit on other games while thinking that your taste is much more superior. History is not my thing so I choose to ignore it.

Please keep your arrogance and biased opinion with yourself if you cannot post a balanced discussion.
TSCheesenium
post Nov 4 2014, 12:22 AM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(Davidtcf @ Nov 3 2014, 11:30 PM)
Chill you two..  shocking.gif make peace not war..  icon_rolleyes.gif

Each to their own... Civ franchise is already a well known classic and loved by many.

EU4 type of grand strategy also have a large following. Yet ppl lovin' Civ5 might not end up lovin' EU4... and vice versa too. Some will like both.

Other turn-based/4X games like AoW, HoMM, XCOM, Endless Legend are all also awesome.

I personally like to try out as many games as I can. Every game plays differently and has its own fun factor. No need to criticize each other.. most important is to have fun!  laugh.gif

only problem is budget  moneyflies.gif so sales time is always a good time to buy them all and try them all!
*
No offence, but I dislike people who think that they found a subgenre of more in depth games in a genre, then, start to look down on other games in the genres that generally that has less depth. It is common to find sim racer who enjoys Assetto Corsa, rFactor and so on that looks down on other racing games in the genre because they think they are more superior after being exposed to a more complex game.

Its good that you found something you enjoy but do not assume that people who doesnt play the same "superior" game you like are playing Bat Rats or Big Rigs equivalent of the genre. Different games are suitable with different people.


TSCheesenium
post Nov 4 2014, 12:24 AM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(Rei7 @ Nov 4 2014, 12:11 AM)
Everyone speaking about money being the problem..

Money is not the big problem here, the big problem is time.. When are we gonna finish all this backlogs!
*
Exactly, time is the problem for me. I can afford to buy a couple of games each month but the problem is finding the time to play them.

I kinda decided that I wont be getting CoD AW as I like to put some time for Valkyria Chronicles next week instead. Then, probably jump into Elite Dangerous Beta.

Gave up on finishing backlogs now.

EDIT: Dafuq! Why is Space Hulk Ascension coming out so close to VC? cry.gif

This post has been edited by Cheesenium: Nov 4 2014, 12:30 AM
TSCheesenium
post Nov 4 2014, 12:27 AM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(pikachu01 @ Nov 3 2014, 11:08 PM)
Umm, the AI being terrible is already a known fact for 4X games as in what it does is mostly to turtle/harass/expand. It doesn't really react to your own strategy which makes cookie cutter builds achieve victory without problems once you find it.

I didn't say people who enjoy 4X games are retarded. Please don't put words into my mouth. You really like to do thisa a lot, you know that?

People do enjoy 4X games as well. It's the same as Bad Rats or even Big Rigs. Even when the game is broken, it does bring enjoyment. Playing those games certainly ain't retarded but still comparing it to 4X is a little bit weird, but that's a point there if you don't realize what I'm talking about.

I'm not saying my taste is more superior. I'm saying that I don't have to deal with dumb AI in Grand Strategy games. But I have to deal with dull UI as well as steep learning curves. To each his own. I'm not saying Grand Strategy is the holy grail of strategy games. I'm just saying that I can't return to 4X games as I can never deal with it's dumb AI anymore.

I am posting a balanced discussion. You're the one reading it wrong. I still think 4X games are good but not for me as I can't deal with dumb AI that will always lose to cookie cutter builds.

Edit: And one more thing, if you just spend 5 hours to learn Grand Strategy, I'm pretty sure you'll come to same conclusion as I am. And I mean without the bias that you're feeling right now cause I hurt you when I said 4X games have dumb AI.
*
Regardless, just enjoy whatever you like. Dont have to resort to looking down on the games that you dont like as you are comparing 4X like Civ to mediocre games like Bad Rats or Big Rigs. 4X are no way as inferior as those games.

Good for you that you dont have to deal with AI but I am not a fan of history in general so i'll skip EU4, CK2 or any Paradox grand strategy until they do a sci fi version of it.
TSCheesenium
post Nov 4 2014, 12:53 AM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(Rei7 @ Nov 4 2014, 12:31 AM)
Time is always my problem, if not finished my physical games backlog already.

You did? I change of heart ey. Actually that is a good decision, considering VC takes quite a while to finish, and the game is suited for you.

Long time already give up for me. Just trying finishing my physical backlogs..Digital..maybe in the afterlife.
*
The problem is, if I buy CoD. I'll either play VC or COD while the other one is abandoned or on the backlog forever. CoD is not cheap, so might as well save the money for winter sales.

Space Hulk is coming too so I am not sure whether I want to preorder now. Probably gonna skip cause I have a bad feeling that its gonna be a mess.
TSCheesenium
post Nov 4 2014, 10:03 AM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(kianweic @ Nov 4 2014, 05:33 AM)
Better wait for reviews. The latest Space Hulk was so so only.
*
I actually like it and I had finished it. It is really hard and really unforgiving but it is quite rewarding if i can finish a mission.

The developers are quite good too, consistently fixing the game until it is good. I am only worried about the buggy release of the game.

QUOTE(ninty @ Nov 4 2014, 06:31 AM)
I hated the last Space Hulk game because of the friggin slow movement speed, it's like watching old people with arthritis moving.
*
They added a checkbox in the Options where now, you can increase the movement speed. The new game will have new animations that is a lot faster.

The movement speed in the game is correct though, Terminators are fairly slow in movement as the suit is very heavy and heavily armed.
TSCheesenium
post Nov 4 2014, 12:13 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(kianweic @ Nov 4 2014, 11:38 AM)
I have also completed the latest Space Hulk. Particularly tough when you want to save everybody.
*
Yeah. The new game will be better too. They will add level progression, squad customization, new weapons and permanent death.
TSCheesenium
post Nov 4 2014, 01:41 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(Rei7 @ Nov 4 2014, 01:22 PM)
Wondering if you guys can help me here. Just something simple.
So i'm gonna do a Master's Thesis in Video Games and I need some more topics to think about, to kickstart my brain.
I've been thinking of doing a research in Story Telling in Video Games, but it seems too general and probably a lot of people have done it already. So I have to narrow down to something specific.

Anything or everything is fine, if you have any ideas. A suggestion of topic of study on Video Games of any sort, or narrowing the story telling topic down to something like in single player games, in mmo, in rpg, or any other interesting ideas.

Example of a simple topic : Story telling in Video games, Narration in Video games, Architecture Design in Video games and etc.
*
How about something about the psychology behind free to play games or even games in general? There are a lot of material out there about Skinner Box, Pain Induction and so on.
TSCheesenium
post Nov 4 2014, 02:10 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(Rei7 @ Nov 4 2014, 02:04 PM)
That one could work. The issue that we face and we have the most  laugh.gif
*
I choose that cause it has probably a lot of material out there from talks/articles from Free to Play convention to various psychology journals. There should be a lot to write.
TSCheesenium
post Nov 4 2014, 03:42 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
Still dont know whether I want to go or not. Looks interesting though.
TSCheesenium
post Nov 4 2014, 04:12 PM

Vigilo Confido
*******
Senior Member
4,852 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
QUOTE(Rei7 @ Nov 4 2014, 03:52 PM)
Registration will close on 9th of November.
Still have around 50 slots I think.
*
Part of me dont want to torture my rig for long hours for 3 days while I really dont know what to play when I am there.

If there are a lot of people going, maybe i'll go. lol.

9 Pages « < 5 6 7 8 9 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0501sec    0.43    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 11:54 PM