QUOTE(hellfire8888 @ Apr 19 2015, 10:19 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
i disagree 4k is a bad display having using it for 1 month. In fact after using a 4k screen u would not go back to full hd.
The debate on whether a 4k screen is bad or good is the same as the debate on whether i7 cpu is good or i5 is good. Most of the games are not optimize to use up all core either. So why bother getting i7?
Furthermore having a 48Hz screen does not mean i am limited to 48fps for all games. I can still get 100 +fps depending on the game i am playing.
4K means better when you are running photo editing tool cause you need more resolution not more screen refresh rate.
4K also means you can watch better 4K video. It does not matter if the content is limited cause in the end 4K video is the future. And with such cheap offering from MSI , lenovo etc it is a no brainer. You dont have to break and arm or leg to be an early adopter.
And the statement single GPU cant support 4K gamins is also false. It depend on what type of game. Strategy game will be fine. So it depends on what game you play most. And if there is a need there is such thing call lower the screen resolution. And it is not pointless because it is the same as a car..Why purchase a 2 liter car when the you cant go beyond 120kmh on the road? The reason is simple, it gives you option..the option to go fast or slow. And most of the time you need to be slow due to practicality.

I think there is no point in starting the argument again regarding 4k screen. Do note I mentioned IMO aka In My Opinion. You can disregard it if you feels that it is wrong. I didn't said things like 4k is useless, I just don't recommend it currently. The technology will probably matured in 2-3 years time, and IMHO during that time, you will most likely change a new laptop already. During that time a better screen will be available. It is my opinion, you can disregard it if you don't like it.
Regarding FPS, you will realize on some game you're forced to use v-sync due to screen tearing. Yes you can still go beyond it w/o v-sync. This also means your screen respond time is significantly lesser compared to other screen. More resolution doesn't mean better image quality. You still need to take into account about the color vibrant, density etc etc. I believe the current 4k screen can't be compared to a good FHD IPS screen. Yet again it is my own opinion so disregard it if you feel it is wrong.
Yes I know 4k screen is the future tech, no need to keep emphasizing it. Since you use a car example, I will also use similar example to explain my opinion. Driverless car / autonomous car is the future, and it already has a working prototype available in the market. Why not just purchase it instead of conventional car since it is the future tech ? There exists a reason why it is not suitable to buy it now right ?
Regarding games, I do mention High Demanding Game aka GPU Power Hungry Game. Maybe I didn't explicitly mention it, but since the topic is discussing about GTA V which is a high demanding game, you can implicitly guess the type of games I'm referring to right ? If not I apologize for not making myself clear. Sorry about that. I believe those strategy game you mentioned is not high demanding game. (Popular games =/= high demanding game)
It is a proven fact that single GPU can't support 4k gaming (high demanding game) on ultra settings with x8 SMAA or AA on. Even GTX Titan X can barely hit 60fps in benchmark, so mobile GPU is 100% not able to handle it. Only option currently is SLI. I also did mention games like Star Citizen and Witcher, which is the high demanding upcoming games. Those games looks ridiculously good in FHD, and the gpu now barely can get a good FPS with x8 SMAA, so I can't imagine how it looks like when it is 4k.
Yes you can always tune down. I will not say it again that it defeat the purpose of purchasing a 4k screen since you already mention it yourself. You are emphasizing on the price of the 4k model vs the fhd model. But you realize there is no more promotion ongoing already right ? During that time it may be a good choice, but it may not be now. You also need to take note that if the user plays a lot of high demanding game, it is like telling them to purchase a 4k screen and play it at 1080p every time. Yes no all game is so demanding, but you also need to take into account that future game may be more demanding/gpu power hungry. You keep emphasizing on future, but you forget to take into account about future game will be more demanding and it will stress single gpu more. 1080p will be no problem, but 4k will most likely have issue.
Well cheers. I respect your opinion. We just have different view on 4k screen

P.S: GTA V requirement is low. When you're playing at lowest settings, the graphic just looks like CS 1.6. But when you're playing at ultra settings, it is a whole different story.
This post has been edited by miong93: Apr 19 2015, 11:03 PM