Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

> Military Thread V13

views
     
thpace
post Sep 6 2014, 11:38 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Sep 6 2014, 11:36 PM)
Korea normal,they own declare 4Gen only .....
*
compared to the japan type 10 which also japan declare themselves 4th gen.. almost same capabilities
thpace
post Sep 7 2014, 12:02 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Sep 6 2014, 11:55 PM)
yes, i know ..... they have some 4gen feature, but overall industry say not full 4 Gen standard yet. it may suite korea/japan geographic/ environment/ weather.
too advance also it give more hard to sell oversea market. seems market still not accept this advance type MBT . maybe few year later. country more advance stage than army will accept it.
*
sold to turkey ad? brows.gif brows.gif

the turret design will be diff only but the auto loader mechanism and the hull will based on the K2.
The only real major problem with the K2 compared to the type 10 would be it powerpack and transmission. Underpowered and unreliable

That why, Turkey was interested in the type 10 powerpack but Japan say dont want sweat.gif But tat was before the export ban lifted, now not sure how,
thpace
post Sep 7 2014, 12:11 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Sep 7 2014, 12:04 AM)
wait and see ... and final spec .... still long wait ..
*
M1A3 coming out soon. US say is gen 3++/4th, then we can do better comparison

Turbine engine suspected is to replaced with standard diesel (guess US canot tahan makan minyak like hell ad)

and possible return of the autoloader reducing crew to 3 man


thpace
post Sep 7 2014, 12:32 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Sep 7 2014, 12:25 AM)
actually for MBT turbine engine more high fuel consumption than diesel engine, M1A1 Turbine engine fuel consumtion 380L/100km vs Leopard 2A just around 230L/100km.
but turbine have alot advantage, it get full engine power after turbine engine start, just like jet engine, good for acceleration and speed,  disadvantage is more complex maintenance,high fuel consumption,hot engine, also low lifespan for Turbine engine。 
but diesel engine just get  full power at max rpm. in low speed, diesel engine get better fuel consumption. 
it all about cost. us not border fuel cost.
*
the turbine T-80 was hated by the russian due to poor on site maintenance capabilities and kuat makan minyak, in end they swap for traditional diesel

US also canot afford ad, there on budget report back in 2012 iinm saying reduce on board time on M1 during training to lower fuel consumption. That why, get more tank simulator to replace real training
thpace
post Sep 8 2014, 02:24 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Sep 8 2014, 12:07 PM)
Probably quite useful for trolling Japanese & ROC air defense systems. Some calls to the Pentagon would be made before the confusion could be cleared up.

Wouldn't surprise me though if China already have a good understanding on Apache capabilities, history shows some secret deals were made with certain countries. Notable was with Israel in the past regarding Israel selling some sensitive data including Patriot missile technology to China. I seem to recall last year Finnish authorities seized a British-flagged ship bound for Shanghai which had a hidden load of 69 Patriot missiles.
*
patriot is an outdated system.. Israel are the ones that pointed out weakness to US. In fact, i wont be surprise, china get to know its weakness from Israel. Even not, there always their cyber-hacking team to snoop around American sensitive information brows.gif

But then again, it not surprising. China have also been speculated to sell secret to US via Israel, russian weapon secret especially ones that was co-developed between china and russia


thpace
post Sep 8 2014, 06:06 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(junchuan @ Sep 8 2014, 05:19 PM)
Guys do u all think buying kora class corvette from india is gd idea??  basically an enlarged version of vietnam molniya missile spam boat, 16 kh35 missile with 130km range, if conflict rly happen i think like 12 of these missile spam corvettes would be more scary than 6 sgpvs, and wikipedia say each ship 40million usd(wtf) but i think that is outdated prices and may or may not include weapons. and its indian, indian relationship w china not that good i think. so, gud idea??  biggrin.gif  brows.gif
*
get Brahmos, there news news Indian is in talk with asean country including malaysia on potential Brahmos sale
Most likely the air launch variant since our MKM and MKI is almost similar and can be equid with little or not effort

This news was back in 2010, i dunno the plan is still on. Once Kedah class is armed with brahmos, we will have our anti-ship frigate brows.gif since the sgpv is mainly anti-sub variant

excoet is subsonic antiship, brahmos is supersonic. It nice to have diff combination of anti-ship system

QUOTE
The missile stole center stage at Malaysia's Defense Services Asia exhibition, with high-profile potential customers including South Africa, Egypt, Oman, Brunei and other African and Middle Eastern countries.

Defense Talk reported this month that India was considering exporting the BrahMos to Chile, Brazil, South Africa and Indonesia. The keenest interest, however, has come from Malaysia, which is looking for a new weapons system to fit its Meko A100 Kedah class ships.

Source

Here another one why can be done

QUOTE
BrahMos’s Market Promotion General Manager, Praveen Pathak, told KLS’s journalist that BrahMos has already been doing assessment on ship body of Meko 100. The result is BrahMos is suitable to be installed on it.

Currently, the Indian Navy has installed BrahMos on her naval ship with inclined launch style which is different from western style. Whether BrahMos could be installed in crossover style, Praveen Pathak answered that it is certainly no problem!

He said BrahMos has already done an assessment on it that there is no problem to develop crossover style launcher, BrahMos can be designed and integrated according to customer requirement. But, the problem now is Malaysian government hasn’t made any official requirement to install missile on NGPV.

BrahMos is a multipurpose supersonic anti-ship missile and suitable be installed on 500 ton, 1000 ton and 2000 ton above warships. There is no problem to integrate BrahMos into western standard ship. But, 500 ton missile fast attack boat is not suitable to install vertical launch BrahMos system.


Source


thpace
post Sep 8 2014, 06:19 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(LTZ @ Sep 8 2014, 06:15 PM)
2 JMSDF (Japan Navy) destroyers at sepangar base today..... soccer match this evening
*
which class?
thpace
post Sep 8 2014, 06:25 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(LTZ @ Sep 8 2014, 06:21 PM)
I am expecting the question.....aku baca signal hari jumaat lepas so dah lupa nama ape..... but 2 different classes.
*
baca signal?

u inside sub now kah? hmm.gif
thpace
post Sep 8 2014, 07:38 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(junchuan @ Sep 8 2014, 07:30 PM)
I think it would be better to have strategic partner like india more than pakistan bcos afterall india gonna be 3rd largest economy and much more weapons systems, plus ive always thought we were closer to india than pakistan
*
that roles is most likely be turkey

we are closer to turkey compared to pakistan and india
thpace
post Sep 8 2014, 07:41 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(junchuan @ Sep 8 2014, 07:31 PM)
Imagine what would happen if we hijack their sub at night and force the crew to teach us how to operate the sub then steal both subs haha biggrin.gif
*
tat a declaration of war rolleyes.gif
thpace
post Sep 8 2014, 08:24 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(junchuan @ Sep 8 2014, 08:05 PM)
but turkey military industry seems small compared to india, economy oso sad.gif
*
tat why turkey all joint venture

their tanks with korea, K2 Black Panther

AV8 and adnan is also join venture between turkey and FNSS

even SAM either china or russia

This post has been edited by thpace: Sep 8 2014, 08:34 PM
thpace
post Sep 8 2014, 09:57 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(azriel @ Sep 8 2014, 09:26 PM)
I don't think the K2 Black Panther is a JV between SK & Turkey. On the contrary the Turkish new Altay MBT is based from the K2 Black Panther.
*
I saying JV as in joint development and purchase. The K2 is still not fully ready yet but field initial low production to satisfy public opinion whistling.gif , there still some teething issues. Part of the deals also again if i not mistaken is information sharing between turkey and SK armor development

iinm, their tank will be based on the K2 such as the hull and loader mechanism including parts of the fire control system

the turret will be indigenously designed including guns (Most likely licensed produced Rheinmetall L55 similar to the one on K2)

turkey was interested with the TYPE 10 engine pack but Japan does not want to export it. The original K2 engine pack still having transmission issues plus unreliable. Therefore, they still have to relies on germans MTU

QUOTE(junchuan @ Sep 8 2014, 09:30 PM)
But imagine some country whole cbg come visit then we hijack, wat they can do biggrin.gif
*
more of what we can do defend ourself if they send their forces come here
thpace
post Sep 8 2014, 10:29 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011


EVO-105 Self Propelled 105mm howitzer

maybe Malaysia can start by this since we got many 105mm gun and HICOM 5 tan trucks smile.gif

Just the fire control and communication system mayb need outside purchase
thpace
post Sep 8 2014, 10:46 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(heavyduty @ Sep 8 2014, 10:44 PM)
meh,one of the reasons why people go for 105s is because it can be man handled.if vehicle based baik go all out for larger guns
*
just wishful thinking since army got alot of aging 105 and hicom trucks. Some sort of stop gap improvements tongue.gif
thpace
post Sep 10 2014, 12:14 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(patt_sue @ Sep 9 2014, 10:41 PM)
CNO: Malaysia Offers U.S. P-8 Detachment Site

By RICHARD R. BURGESS, Managing Editor

ARLINGTON, Va. — Malaysia has offered the use of a base in East Malaysia on the island of Borneo to the United States as a site for detachments of Navy P-8A Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft.

Speaking Sept. 8 about the Asia-Pacific strategic rebalance to an audience at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington, Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) ADM Jonathan W. Greenert said that “recently, the Malaysians have offered us to fly detachments of P-8s out of East Malaysia. You can see the closeness to the South China Sea. So we have opportunities and we ought to continue to nurture them.”

A staging site in East Malaysia would enable the Navy’s maritime patrol aircraft easier access for operating over the South China Sea and shipping lanes such as the Strait of Malacca and the Sunda Strait, through which much of the world’s commerce passes.

Malaysia allowed Navy P-8A and P-3C aircraft to operate from West Malaysia during the search for Malaysian Airlines Flight 370 that disappeared on March 8. The Malaysian government expressed appreciation to the United States for its response.

The South China Sea has been a region of increased tensions in recent years because of competing claims over islands and shoals where mineral resources may exist and because of the Chinese naval build-up, particularly the submarine base on Hainan. There have been several incidents at sea involving Chinese coast guard ships and U.S. Navy warships and ocean surveillance ships and aircraft in international waters off China. The most recent involved a Chinese J-11 fighter flying dangerously close to a U.S. Navy P-8A over the South China Sea in late August.

http://www.seapowermagazine.org/stories/20...campaign=buffer
*
Most likely KK airport whistling.gif

since tat the closest to South china sea and alot of US militray aircraft have landed there before

thpace
post Sep 10 2014, 12:33 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(waja2000 @ Sep 10 2014, 12:31 AM)
i guest labuan airforce base
*
I was thinking kk because that the closest edge to south china sea, well labuan is another option

china wont be too happy about this since it almost their backyard tongue.gif
thpace
post Sep 10 2014, 10:29 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Sep 10 2014, 10:23 AM)
Needs a major modification to the mkm fuselage to carry these big guns, their mki modified by the hal india

user posted image
*
that the full size variant if i not mistaken

anyway, brahmos was one of the proposed missile system to arm our kedah class

QUOTE
The missile stole center stage at Malaysia's Defense Services Asia exhibition, with high-profile potential customers including South Africa, Egypt, Oman, Brunei and other African and Middle Eastern countries.

Defense Talk reported this month that India was considering exporting the BrahMos to Chile, Brazil, South Africa and Indonesia. The keenest interest, however, has come from Malaysia, which is looking for a new weapons system to fit its Meko A100 Kedah class ships.

source

QUOTE
BrahMos’s Market Promotion General Manager, Praveen Pathak, told KLS’s journalist that BrahMos has already been doing assessment on ship body of Meko 100. The result is BrahMos is suitable to be installed on it.

Currently, the Indian Navy has installed BrahMos on her naval ship with inclined launch style which is different from western style. Whether BrahMos could be installed in crossover style, Praveen Pathak answered that it is certainly no problem!

He said BrahMos has already done an assessment on it that there is no problem to develop crossover style launcher, BrahMos can be designed and integrated according to customer requirement. But, the problem now is Malaysian government hasn’t made any official requirement to install missile on NGPV.

BrahMos is a multipurpose supersonic anti-ship missile and suitable be installed on 500 ton, 1000 ton and 2000 ton above warships. There is no problem to integrate BrahMos into western standard ship. But, 500 ton missile fast attack boat is not suitable to install vertical launch BrahMos system.

http://www.klsreview.com/HTML/2009Jan_Jun/20090608_06.html
thpace
post Sep 10 2014, 10:25 PM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(yinchet @ Sep 10 2014, 10:19 PM)
Not just shipping container.
it can be anywhere on train on lorry or on some random location.
it can be use as anti ship missile, or cruise missile.
top speed iinm mach2.9.
Not far from brahmos top speed.
*
once approaching target, then will sprint run supersonic in the final stage.. Tat oni give a very short amount of time for the ship defence system to response to the threat

while brahmos is supersonic all the time with with some added feature to trick or avoid the ship defense system
thpace
post Sep 11 2014, 12:26 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(junchuan @ Sep 10 2014, 11:38 PM)
i thot i saw b4 on some official looking website say military equipment cannot disguise as civilian or smth??? and brahmos warhead i think a lot more big than klub if i not wrong  biggrin.gif
*
canot red cross or enemy insignia

or any other civilian logo

but when war, anything goes
thpace
post Sep 11 2014, 12:34 AM

Rising Star
******
Senior Member
1,210 posts

Joined: Aug 2011
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Sep 11 2014, 12:26 AM)
Multipurpose cruise missile maybe impressive,but surely they cost a lot more than purpose-built anti-ship missiles due to the more advanced on-board computers and guidance systems and whatnot. With Malaysian government's notorious penny-pinching when buying defense assets,a smaller arsenal being a trade-off of a few advanced missiles is not a good deal.

Also someone made a good point,can you legally disguise the transport & deployment of weapons as civilian stuff? I thought all military weapons needs to be marked as such? Probably on some Geneva convention clause or somewhere? I suppose you can play with technicalities,like disguising a missile launcher truck as a normal military transport truck,but I feel launching missiles from a civilian looking shipping container breaks some international law somewhere. biggrin.gif
*
that why ppl that have it does not want to be known to have it right?

whistling.gif whistling.gif

This post has been edited by thpace: Sep 11 2014, 12:34 AM

7 Pages < 1 2 3 4 > » 
Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0602sec    0.57    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 12:28 AM