
Military Thread V13
Military Thread V13
|
|
Oct 21 2014, 11:31 AM
Return to original view | Post
#61
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
![]() |
|
|
Oct 25 2014, 02:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#62
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
|
|
|
Oct 25 2014, 03:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#63
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Oct 25 2014, 02:43 PM) Projected largest caliber weapon is 30mm only, although can also fit a 120mm mortar or anti-tank missiles. If there are subsequent R&D projects as planned.....the platform should support guns like 90mm CockerillCan see full projected variants of AV8 in pic below ![]() ![]() |
|
|
Oct 30 2014, 01:07 PM
Return to original view | Post
#64
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
|
|
|
Oct 30 2014, 08:08 PM
Return to original view | Post
#65
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Oct 30 2014, 04:14 PM) ^^^ For PLANI wonder what the PLA will become in the next 20 years in the meantime if China's economy continues to prosper like today. Perhaps nearly comparable to US Navy, in terms of the quality and quantity of missile guided destroyers, but with far more frigates and corvettes. But, still weaker in terms of naval aviation and nuclear submarine force. |
|
|
Oct 31 2014, 06:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#66
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
![]() Should use larger target like derelict cargo ship or LST.....can't asses the destruction effect of Blackshark with such a small target This post has been edited by Frozen_Sun: Oct 31 2014, 06:01 PM |
|
|
Nov 1 2014, 06:28 AM
Return to original view | Post
#67
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Nov 1 2014, 12:11 AM) Modern guided torpedoes won't do that much damage anyway, because the explosive charge is usually much reduced to make way for things like seeker heads and steering controls into the body of a torpedo. So I doubt a torpedo can sink a well-prepared ship nowadays. Cripple, yes,but probably don't have the power to sink a warship by itself. Although some modern torpedoes use shaped charge to maximize damage, its not like the olden days where torpedoes were unguided, but can pack as much as 1 ton of TNT into each torpedo. With such a test, we actually could understand the extent of the damage.Now that's firepower. This is Yang-class destroyer of Taiwanese Navy when being hit by SUT torpedo imported from PT DI, Indonesia ![]() This is Australian frigate with the same design with TNI-AL's Van Speijk class when hit by Mk48 torpedo ![]() |
|
|
Nov 1 2014, 02:28 PM
Return to original view | Post
#68
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Nov 1 2014, 07:51 AM) ^^^ Torpedoes like Mk48 have proximity fuse for under the keel explosion, so I think this effect can be repeated.Yes, nice, but the 'ship breaking in half when hit by torpedo' effect is actually happens only occasionally, with some very specific conditions. Actually what happens is that the torpedo is actually detonated under or at the keel of the ship, creating a supercavitation shockwave bubble. This can actually result in 2 effects, either the hull collapses into the hollow space in the water created by the bubble or is actually pushed up with the bubble's shockwave. Either case, the hull, temporarily unsupported by water along its length and impacted by the high volume and speed of water rushing into the bubble, can break apart quite dramatically,but ONLY if the ship is hit in a specific manner. A simple side impact directly to the hull won't recreate this effect. Of course people associate this 'breaking apart' effect with all torpedo impacts, because its so dramatic but in fact it happens only occasionally if not rarely. ![]() What really happens Reference: Effect of underwater explosions |
|
|
Nov 1 2014, 03:01 PM
Return to original view | Post
#69
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Nov 1 2014, 02:48 PM) Sure it can, but I think real-life scenarios most will try to hit ship directly rather than try to achieve this effect. I think a shot direct to the propeller or steering gear is more preferable and can usually guarantee a mobility kill on the ship. Isn't it easier to destroy ships with torpedo using proximity fuse? Modern ships would easily detect incoming torpedoes through its hydrophones, so they will move away from it. Hitting the ship's propeller with contact fuse while the ship is wildly maneuvering may be difficult. The torpedo could simply swim to the general area under the keel and explode. It may not break the ship in two.... due to the wild maneuvering, but the ship could still have serious structural damage and leaks. This post has been edited by Frozen_Sun: Nov 1 2014, 03:06 PM |
|
|
Nov 1 2014, 03:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#70
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Nov 1 2014, 03:17 PM) I am still thinking with proximity fuze, only that the torpedo should be aimed for the propeller or steering gear. Most torpedoes can do both active and passive homing, but for a torpedo to use active sonar for locking onto the hull of a target is too noisy and can potentially give the target unnecessary warning. A passive mode to lock on, with the torpedo slowly following the general direction of the target ship from behind, following the sound of the propellers before going full speed from close range can give a much nastier surprise to the target. This can be helped by the fact that the wake of the ship is rarely monitored by ship's sonar due to the interference noise of the propellers themselves. That would be similar to the use of G7es TV acoustic torpedo by U-boat in WW2....hit rate more than 50 percent. Also the fact that the propeller and rudder is relatively fragile and can be destroyed quite easily as they are quite exposed. ![]() But with modern torpedo....... I think the procedure is to fire the torpedo with wire guided instruction to general area of the ships and then the torpedo switches to passive homing to approach the targets quietly...and when it gets quite close to the target...the wire is cut, the seeker becomes active and the torpedo swim at max speed to pursue the target.... Maybe LTZ could confirm whether this is true..... |
|
|
Nov 1 2014, 06:15 PM
Return to original view | Post
#71
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(yinchet @ Nov 1 2014, 03:59 PM) Yes....the interception point and countermeasure detection information is transmitted through the wire and the torpedo enters the full-active, high-speed mode at the terminal phase. But, there's no passive homing phase in the video. |
|
|
Nov 2 2014, 06:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#72
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
|
|
|
Nov 2 2014, 09:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#73
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
I think using remote-controlled target ship with running engine and some fuel in the tank will be criticized due to potential environmental risks.
So, perhaps that's the reason we never see this performed. Even US never did that, even if they have the money and technology to do that. |
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 06:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#74
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(KYPMbangi @ Nov 3 2014, 01:16 AM) 9 US ships cancel port calls to Subic That marine guy could be secretly paid a huge amount of money by Chinese intelligence agency to hunt and kill transgender Traders cite anti-American sentiments over Laude slay ![]() In this Oct. 17, 2014, photo, a US marine walks inside the USS Peleliu, where US Marine Pfc. Joseph Scott Pemberton was said to be detained after allegedly killing Filipino transgender Jeffrey “Jennifer” Laude at the Subic Bay free port, Zambales province. Read more: http://globalnation.inquirer.net/113820/9-.../#ixzz3HvsIpGQl Follow us: @inquirerdotnet on Twitter | inquirerdotnet on Facebook [Inquirer] |
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 02:25 PM
Return to original view | Post
#75
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(azriel @ Nov 3 2014, 10:57 AM) Lery Romina POLRI now has been mimicking IDF tactic of "encouraging" its attractive female policewomen to appear in the public. These photos are surely endorsed by their public relation department. QUOTE(waja2000 @ Nov 3 2014, 11:23 AM) Typhoon has serious readiness problems in Germany and Spain.This post has been edited by Frozen_Sun: Nov 3 2014, 02:30 PM |
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 02:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#76
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
|
|
|
Nov 4 2014, 08:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#77
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
double post
This post has been edited by Frozen_Sun: Nov 4 2014, 08:33 PM |
|
|
Nov 4 2014, 08:31 PM
Return to original view | Post
#78
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(MilitaryMadness @ Nov 4 2014, 03:53 PM) The turret still looks ridiculously tiny given the small size of the tank. AMX-13 is a light tank and it is not designed resist shells fired by other tanks. But the upgraded AMX-13 should resist 25mm or 30mm fired by IFV.I don't see the turret actually giving much protection against a hit. I also doubt the combat staying power due to the fact while the tank can hold 32 shells, the auto-loader can hold only 12 shells at a time. If the magazine runs out, the crew had to reload it manually (from outside the tank,no less!!). ![]() In field situation, AMX-13 will be better suited to support infantry to fire HE shells on infantry emplacements...or with HEAT shells as IFV/APC killer. Besides, 105mm gun is no longer suitable to damage modern MBT, |
|
|
Nov 5 2014, 10:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#79
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(azriel @ Nov 5 2014, 10:39 AM) Quad-packed Sea Ceptor....so each Bung Tomo ship may have the ability to carry up to 64 Sea Ceptor missiles![]() This post has been edited by Frozen_Sun: Nov 5 2014, 11:00 AM |
|
|
Nov 5 2014, 05:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#80
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Sep 2013 |
QUOTE(junchuan @ Nov 5 2014, 03:56 PM) quadpack is only for sylver vls, the bung tomo (and our lekius too btw) use the british GWS-26 vls designed only for 1 sea wolf per hole , so i dont see how sea ceptors can be quadpacked GWS-26 can support CAMM Sea Ceptor? photo of a sea wolf getting launched from the brit gws-26 vls » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « looks tight enuff our gowinds could possibly get the sylver though I think Sea Ceptor can be launched only from SYLVER and Mk 41 |
| Bump Topic Topic ClosedOptions New Topic |
| Change to: | 0.0843sec
0.43
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 01:15 AM |