Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
PS3 and XBOX360 , too weak to play crysis, whoaaaaaa
|
TSjinaun
|
Aug 29 2006, 09:15 PM, updated 20y ago
|
where are my stars???
|
QUOTE Crytek: Next Gen Consoles Are Too Weak for Crysis
Speaking at the Games Convention in Leipzig, Bernd Diemer, senior game designer of Crytek, explained that next-generation consoles don't offer enough computational power to run Crysis, German publication Heise reported.
Although Crysis will support both current and the next version of DirectX, Crytek claims that only DirectX 10 allows the game to run as it was intended by the developers because the next-generation DirectX API, which will ship along with Windows Vista, allows more effects and more objects to be drawn on the screen with a smaller computational cost for the hardware.
Diemer explained that "next generation consoles like the Xbox 360 and the PlayStation 3 do not offer the sufficient power" to assure the quality of gameplay Crytek demand for Crysis.
Crytek reiterated at GC 06 that currently, Crysis in only in development for Windows. We haven't lost hope that we'll eventually see an Xbox 360 version of this first-person shooter.
Source: http://news.teamxbox.com/xbox/11651/Crytek...eak-for-Crysis/
|
|
|
|
|
|
cocklea
|
Aug 29 2006, 09:57 PM
|
|
yalor, read that one just now. waseh, have to wait for PS4 and Xbox720 ler like this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
eone
|
Aug 30 2006, 08:43 AM
|
|
yeah right
|
|
|
|
|
|
xxboxx
|
Aug 30 2006, 10:21 AM
|
|
QUOTE next-generation consoles don't offer enough computational power to run Crysis
Although Crysis will support both current and the next version of DirectX so technically if the game can be run on DX9, thats mean it sure can be run on XB360 and PS3. but nah i don't believe it can't be run on console with as good graphic and effect like PC. computing power that dedicated to fully running games only vs computing power that has to run Windows at the same time, don't think need a proffesor to figure which are more powerful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
windows_sux
|
Aug 30 2006, 10:49 AM
|
Getting Started

|
i think they try to make arcade home console lol...  one big machine for home-user hahaha...
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSjinaun
|
Aug 30 2006, 11:43 AM
|
where are my stars???
|
i've read somewhere that rendering quality of PC equipped with high end 7900gtx SLI surpasses the xbox360's in PREY...
|
|
|
|
|
|
windows_sux
|
Aug 30 2006, 12:29 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(jinaun @ Aug 30 2006, 11:43 AM) i've read somewhere that rendering quality of PC equipped with high end 7900gtx SLI surpasses the xbox360's in PREY... yup no doubt pc will surpasses xbox360...coz with pc we can keep on upgrading..
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mgsrulz
|
Aug 30 2006, 04:59 PM
|
|
Pcs are upgradeable,ofcourse it would surpass the consoles... but think of the price... not EVERYONE can afford to upgrade their graphics card every 2-3 months!
|
|
|
|
|
|
windows_sux
|
Aug 30 2006, 07:37 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(Mgsrulz @ Aug 30 2006, 04:59 PM) Pcs are upgradeable,ofcourse it would surpass the consoles... but think of the price... not EVERYONE can afford to upgrade their graphics card every 2-3 months!  Yup..one high end graphic card already can buy 1 xbox 360 plus xtra games..hehehe.
|
|
|
|
|
|
necromanser
|
Aug 30 2006, 08:48 PM
|
Getting Started

|
oi window_sux. hang tada online ka itu xbox 360. apa da, tak kool la ini macam!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
BurgaFlippinMan
|
Aug 30 2006, 09:05 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Mgsrulz @ Aug 30 2006, 04:59 PM) Pcs are upgradeable,ofcourse it would surpass the consoles... but think of the price... not EVERYONE can afford to upgrade their graphics card every 2-3 months!  you dont actually need to do that often. once a year is hardcore enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mgsrulz
|
Aug 30 2006, 09:06 PM
|
|
QUOTE(BurgaFlippinMan @ Aug 30 2006, 09:05 PM) you dont actually need to do that often. once a year is hardcore enough.   but you dont get exactly the same as in the screenies
|
|
|
|
|
|
prazole
|
Aug 30 2006, 09:25 PM
|
|
if only better graphics means better gameplay.. in reality it doesn't.. with the exception for DOA extreme volleyball 2 This post has been edited by prazole: Aug 30 2006, 09:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
trix
|
Aug 31 2006, 03:19 AM
|
|
using generic code written to cater to all platform, of course it will not be powerful enough the basic of console programming is optimisation for the intended platform, not just relying on raw power like on pc
|
|
|
|
|
|
BurgaFlippinMan
|
Aug 31 2006, 11:16 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Mgsrulz @ Aug 30 2006, 09:06 PM) I dont think that is really true, unless you insist on running them at 1600x1200 with max AA or HDR or whatever...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mgsrulz
|
Aug 31 2006, 11:47 AM
|
|
QUOTE(BurgaFlippinMan @ Aug 31 2006, 11:16 AM) I dont think that is really true, unless you insist on running them at 1600x1200 with max AA or HDR or whatever...precisely what i mean
|
|
|
|
|
|
BurgaFlippinMan
|
Aug 31 2006, 03:24 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Mgsrulz @ Aug 31 2006, 11:47 AM) precisely what i mean  Well you have to understand that game engines are nowadays built to be able to take advantage of ever increasing power to future proof it to a certain extent. No new big engine (think Doom 3, Unreal 3 or whatever) is meant to be able to run decently at its max at release. For example, no rig ran Doom3 decently at its most super duper settings when it first came out. It wasnt crappy coding, it was intentional. Also, you'd need a nice big (and expensive) screen to run stuff at super high res anyway otherwise the fonts would be ridiculously small!
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSMatrix
|
Sep 2 2006, 12:24 PM
|
|
So what? Another PC FPS. Yawnnn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
evilhomura89
|
Sep 2 2006, 12:28 PM
|
|
QUOTE(Mgsrulz @ Aug 30 2006, 04:59 PM) Pcs are upgradeable,ofcourse it would surpass the consoles... but think of the price... not EVERYONE can afford to upgrade their graphics card every 2-3 months!  But if u think again, PC doesn't needs a modchip And PC runs more types of application...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mgsrulz
|
Sep 2 2006, 10:25 PM
|
|
QUOTE(evilhomura89 @ Sep 2 2006, 12:28 PM) But if u think again, PC doesn't needs a modchip And PC runs more types of application... dont forget, the modchip is just a one time payment  also,you dont have to go on with the hassle of installation This post has been edited by Mgsrulz: Sep 2 2006, 10:26 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
mcchin
|
Sep 3 2006, 12:25 AM
|
|
QUOTE(Mgsrulz @ Sep 2 2006, 10:25 PM) dont forget, the modchip is just a one time payment also,you dont have to go on with the hassle of installation  one of the reason why i got into the console scene
|
|
|
|
|
|
prazole
|
Sep 3 2006, 07:44 AM
|
|
QUOTE(mcchin @ Sep 3 2006, 12:25 AM) one of the reason why i got into the console scene not only that.. update patch for graphic driver, sound card, game patch.. etc.. i oersonally feel crysis not coming to console not a big deal to console players.. after all.. FPS is not the reason why ppl owns consoles the first place..
|
|
|
|
|
|
ikanayam
|
Sep 3 2006, 08:51 AM
|
|
QUOTE(prazole @ Sep 2 2006, 06:44 PM) not only that.. update patch for graphic driver, sound card, game patch.. etc.. i oersonally feel crysis not coming to console not a big deal to console players.. after all.. FPS is not the reason why ppl owns consoles the first place.. i'm almost certain it will appear at least on the xbox360 eventually.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUSMatrix
|
Sep 4 2006, 10:55 AM
|
|
QUOTE(evilhomura89 @ Sep 2 2006, 12:28 PM) But if u think again, PC doesn't needs a modchip And PC runs more types of application... Modchip is peanuts compare to keep upgrading PC. And of course PC runs more application...becoz it's a PC!!! I think most people has no intention to run Word/Excel/Pinnacle Studio on a console.
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUScarnbyresurrected
|
Sep 6 2006, 03:31 PM
|
Getting Started

|
Im sure "they will do something bout wont they....i mean SONY...since they are the only one that have not come out 100%...maybe quadrople core processor on ps3.....you never know....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bionic
|
Sep 10 2006, 12:09 AM
|
Getting Started

|
For my opinion, sufficient or insufficient power doesn't really matter
player who select console is because of the variety application are all customize to be play and enjoy the optimal performance without worrying the requirement of the games
hardcore fps player are more dependent on pc processing power due to the high expectation of graphical detail to be displayed
so as for conclusion, if really going for fps, than PC is the choice and easy game control
adventure, action-rpg or so on, console is the choice,
|
|
|
|
|
|
snipersnake
|
Sep 10 2006, 12:36 AM
|
|
thank yhou God in heaven for sparing one more mindless FPS for us all...thank you! one down, morfe to go!
|
|
|
|
|
|
bidfordun
|
Sep 10 2006, 01:04 AM
|
|
i tot ps3 is a superpc with its core, Cell?
|
|
|
|
|
|
BurgaFlippinMan
|
Sep 10 2006, 10:23 AM
|
|
QUOTE(bidfordun @ Sep 10 2006, 01:04 AM) i tot ps3 is a superpc with its core, Cell? Well we dont really know how much of it is real power and how much of it is marketing BS. John Carmack for one has said that the next-gen consoles arent anywhere near as powerful as both MS and Sony would like you to believe. This post has been edited by BurgaFlippinMan: Sep 10 2006, 10:25 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
duke_hunt
|
Sep 15 2006, 12:41 PM
|
Getting Started

|
i bet that the crysis engine will be on the next-gen console, slightly stip down i guess... their market for that game engine is for next-gen gamers, mostly for pc gmers and also the demand from console gamers... i'm quite amazed that even the original xbox can run the crytek engine for farcry, as my dinosaur pc of the latter 865pe can barely handle that game..
|
|
|
|
|