Triple pay during deployment and not taxable yo.

Ala duduk rumah pun boleh mati. At least you die awesome

AV8 is supposed to be backbone for the 'future' malaysian army.the condor is old as shit but still workable

why would the MA buy something that would be obsolete once its on the ground?the AV-8 is going to be the main vehicle for the next 30-40 years

the Anoa was developed out of desperation.they needed an APC that could be made quick and cheap,doesnt care if its shit

can something like the anoa provide a cheap solution to the condor?yes for the immediate future.is it any better than the condor?no

TNI wants to establish more motorized units,thus it can be understandable for them to use the Anoa.the MA is trying to move forward to a new phase of fighting capability,the cheap Anoa is not what they need

btw,as a vehicle commander the notion that IFVs are disposable is

This post has been edited by heavyduty: May 31 2014, 12:31 PM

why would the MA need both a 8x8 and 6x6 version?

dont compare the iveco LMV with humvee la weh

the otokar cobra is more likely for malaysia

it can replace the defender and G-class in combat roles .all infantry regiments can be transformed into fully mechanized regiments

proton accord can replace defender in office role

sakit ati aku tengok LR defender dengan pintle mount dia pegi guna buat hantar surat pejabat

This post has been edited by heavyduty: May 31 2014, 12:46 PM

well it is the way to move forward.the LMV is a force multiplier for the infantry

once,we got intel that the enemy was in a town but we couldn't go in because we didn't have any armoured vehicles,took 5 hours for the armour to arrive,by that time the enemy was already entrenched.took 3 days to take it back

if the AV8 provides better protection,better fire support and better C&C then yes

the presence of ATGMs doesnt mean APCs need to be fodder.tanks are just as susceptible to anti armour fire

why provide soldiers with body armour,helmets and NODs while snipers could take them out?

This post has been edited by heavyduty: May 31 2014, 01:04 PM

I hope it wasn't MILF considering their benefactors

applique armour is a broad statement,manatau dia letak AMAP

puih dia cakap macam salesman

modular is the new marketing buzz word.it used to be 'next-gen' or 'run-flats'

fixing it won't be that much cheaper but will take less amount of time.what used to take mechanics 2 weeks to do in a depot can now be done in the field in a few hours

This post has been edited by heavyduty: May 31 2014, 07:58 PM

no SEA nation is ready to invade anyone.none have the logistics to maintain a front for more than a couple of days except singapore

different thinkings,the US and NATO depend on aerial superiority and superior detection for air defence.russia/USSR know that their backs will be against the wall in most cases so they usually have the best anti air and anti ship capabilities

the patriot is nothing to laugh about

office politics la.AD is primarily the job of the USAF whose command are composed of former air jockeys

if you're a former pilot would you spend your money on developingstupid AD systems or moar badass raptors and lightnings?

the fighters and helos can provide cover so don't need any more AD systems

the patriot and stinger systems are good enough to provide a shield alongside the USAF

Both. The M1A1M without DU is still a capable tank

The tank crews are inexperienced and under trained for combined arms warfare

Maybe the tank was already abandoned?

Buat perhiasan je wings dia . Buat jump qualifying je

Nope.

Towed howitzers are simpler and easier to transport . but their roles will be supplemented by mobile howitzers and heavy mortars

9mm polis ada banyak. 5.7mm mahai

PDRM rarely engage body armour equipped criminals so 9mm is good enough and with its attitude of emptying an entire magazine on anything that moves memang mahal la

This post has been edited by heavyduty: Jun 29 2014, 11:14 PM

Their property Sukati depa la nak buat peraturan apa

High center of gravity and it's top heavy. Inherit danger of all armoured vehicles.

They don't have modern safety features. Accident macam duduk dalam kereta zaman 50s

RIP to the VC and cpl. Hope the others recover

It's normal to open the hatches to increase visibility. The vehicles has a lot of blind spots so the driver depends on the commander for directions

I pernah langgar kambing. Vehicle terbalik, gunner patah tangan. Kambing hidup. Wtf

Dah memang Nasib aku dengan kambing nak buat macam mana. Ok lagi dari langgar lembu ke kuda ke. Yang ni dekat dengan base. Driver baru masuk seminggu, x reti nak main brek

In the 80s considered high tech wo..

The case with the MRAP was caused by lack of driving experience . Didn't know what it could take

Dude, you know that anything larger than a 30mm round will likely turn an IFV into butter

This post has been edited by heavyduty: Jul 5 2014, 01:31 AM