Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
110 Pages « < 46 47 48 49 50 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Investment EKOCHERAS @ JALAN CHERAS (Ver 3) [MRT PROPERTY], Where Cheras becomes Mont'Jiulai

views
     
soon9913
post Aug 11 2014, 02:18 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
918 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
QUOTE(pepper99 @ Aug 11 2014, 01:46 PM)
actually do u all think the proposed link bridge and ramp up to mrr2 will be materialised?somehow i personally think both r just empty promises.. haha just feeling.. but anyhow.. ekc is just steps away from mrt.. so yeahh
*
Bro, why do think this is empty promise.
From my understanding, EKC will use government grant to build the U-turn flyover..
It was mentioned in the news and u can see there is progress work done in Tmn Billion.

This post has been edited by soon9913: Aug 11 2014, 02:19 PM
Jagalat
post Aug 11 2014, 02:24 PM

(J)et L(ag) Ji(alat)
*******
Senior Member
5,949 posts

Joined: Oct 2013
QUOTE(soon9913 @ Aug 11 2014, 02:40 PM)
which flyover u mean? the proposed U- turn flyover or the existing flyover to KL?
*
The existing flyover to KL...



This post has been edited by Jagalat: Aug 11 2014, 02:34 PM
soon9913
post Aug 11 2014, 02:29 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
918 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
QUOTE(Jagalat @ Aug 11 2014, 02:24 PM)
The existing flyover to KL...
*
bro, existing already got 4 lane. 2 to roundabout and the other 2 lane to flyover toward KL. biggrin.gif


Jagalat
post Aug 11 2014, 02:34 PM

(J)et L(ag) Ji(alat)
*******
Senior Member
5,949 posts

Joined: Oct 2013
QUOTE(soon9913 @ Aug 11 2014, 03:29 PM)
bro, existing already got 4 lane. 2 to roundabout and the other 2 lane to flyover toward KL. biggrin.gif
*
What I hope not to see is that they "utilize" one of the two lanes(that leads to the round-about), as the lane to U-turn flyover...

Current: 2(flyover to KL) + 2(Billion round-about)

Hope: 2(flyover to KL) + 2(Billion round-about) + 1(to U-turn flyover)

Not wish: 2(flyover to KL) + 1(Billion round-about) + 1(to U-turn flyover)

pepper99
post Aug 11 2014, 02:43 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
203 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(soon9913 @ Aug 11 2014, 03:18 PM)
Bro, why do think this is empty promise.
From my understanding, EKC will use government grant to build the U-turn flyover..
It was mentioned in the news and u can see there is progress work done in Tmn Billion.
*
hmmm coz from wat i saw.. the tmn billion hillside is used for pillar for MRT.. it will be too too narrow if they r going to build another pillar to link MRR2..
soon9913
post Aug 11 2014, 02:58 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
918 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
QUOTE(Jagalat @ Aug 11 2014, 02:34 PM)
What I hope not to see is that they "utilize" one of the two lanes(that leads to the round-about), as the lane to U-turn flyover...

Current: 2(flyover to KL) + 2(Billion round-about)

Hope: 2(flyover to KL) + 2(Billion round-about) + 1(to U-turn flyover)

Not wish: 2(flyover to KL) + 1(Billion round-about) + 1(to U-turn flyover)
*
from the photo you shared earlier, i dont think the road can accommodate 5 lanes

biggrin.gif
Jagalat
post Aug 11 2014, 03:00 PM

(J)et L(ag) Ji(alat)
*******
Senior Member
5,949 posts

Joined: Oct 2013
QUOTE(pepper99 @ Aug 11 2014, 03:43 PM)
hmmm coz from wat i saw.. the tmn billion hillside is used for pillar for MRT.. it will be too too narrow if they r going to build another pillar to link MRR2..
*
I am suspecting the Billion "edge-cutting" area is meant for MRT pillar also.

That is why I wish not to see to see: 2(flyover to KL) + 1(Billion round-about) + 1(to U-turn flyover).
If this is the case, traffic congestion at the Billion round-about will not be resolved.

Jagalat
post Aug 11 2014, 03:03 PM

(J)et L(ag) Ji(alat)
*******
Senior Member
5,949 posts

Joined: Oct 2013
QUOTE(soon9913 @ Aug 11 2014, 03:58 PM)
from the photo you shared earlier, i dont think the road can accommodate 5 lanes

biggrin.gif
*
Then, another possible configuration is to force to use the U-turn flyover, ie

2(flyover to KL) + 0(Billion round-about) + 2(to U-turn flyover).


CMW123
post Aug 11 2014, 09:15 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,774 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
QUOTE(neonikson1 @ Aug 11 2014, 10:05 AM)
I think rm2.5 psf is more realistic given the current rental market.
*
Think the eventual critical market rental rate will depend on few factors:

1. The overall success of the EKC as the future landmark of Cheras
2. Whether the MRT is running yet
3. The success of the mall
4. Internal competition. This will involve analysis on the size composition of the different units within EKC vs the demand of the target tenant pool who CAN afford the asking rental. Who CAN and is willing to pay
5. Small units will have higher rental rate psf vs bigger unit
CMW123
post Aug 11 2014, 09:19 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,774 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
QUOTE(CMW123 @ Aug 9 2014, 10:39 PM)
What are the statistics for EKC?

Total Soho units =

Total one room 762 sf Soho units =

Total Soho units with 2 rooms n above =


Total SA units =

Total 596 sf studio =

Total one room 821 sf unit =

Total SA with 2 rooms n above =

*
Any taikor know these statistics as it will provide some guide on the strength or weakness of different sized units vis-a-vis the others i.e. In terms of internal competition for subsale or rental upon VP?
soon9913
post Aug 11 2014, 10:30 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
918 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
QUOTE(CMW123 @ Aug 11 2014, 09:15 PM)
Think the eventual critical market rental rate will depend on few factors:

1. The overall success of the EKC as the future landmark of Cheras
2. Whether the MRT is running yet
3. The success of the mall
4. Internal competition. This will involve analysis on the size composition of the different units within EKC vs the demand of the target tenant pool who CAN afford the asking rental. Who CAN and is willing to pay
5. Small units will have higher rental rate psf vs bigger unit
*
Bro, mind to explain more about item 5 ? I'm having bigger unit. Any example quote?
pepper99
post Aug 12 2014, 09:15 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
203 posts

Joined: Aug 2009
QUOTE(soon9913 @ Aug 11 2014, 11:30 PM)
Bro, mind to explain more about item 5 ? I'm having bigger unit. Any example quote?
*
technically bigger unit will fetch higher rental.. but not all tenants can afford bigger unit n hence higher rental.. so smaller units will fetch better rental in terms of size.. for example.. my fren renting a unit in TCM for rm2.6k fully furnished around 600 sqft.. i think bro CMW123 is trying to imply this??
soon9913
post Aug 12 2014, 10:31 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
918 posts

Joined: Jan 2012
QUOTE(pepper99 @ Aug 12 2014, 09:15 AM)
technically bigger unit will fetch higher rental.. but not all tenants can afford bigger unit n hence higher rental.. so smaller units will fetch better rental in terms of size.. for example.. my fren renting a unit in TCM for rm2.6k fully furnished around 600 sqft.. i think bro CMW123 is trying to imply this??
*
I thou should be the other way, there are many small units available and limited units for 11++ sqf. Therefore, 11++sqf should fetch better rental rate instead?... tongue.gif
neonikson1
post Aug 12 2014, 06:07 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,086 posts

Joined: Feb 2011
QUOTE(soon9913 @ Aug 12 2014, 10:31 AM)
I thou should be the other way, there are many small units available and limited units for 11++ sqf. Therefore, 11++sqf should fetch better rental rate instead?...  tongue.gif
*
The concept is like bulk sale, the higher the volume the lower the unit cost.
Jagalat
post Aug 12 2014, 06:12 PM

(J)et L(ag) Ji(alat)
*******
Senior Member
5,949 posts

Joined: Oct 2013
Weekday Sidetrack 1 - For those interested...

The effect of inflation on mortgage loan repayments

Points picked randomly from the article
- If loan interest rates > inflation
Pay off your Loan

- If loan interest rates < inflation
Use your money for either investments or consumption items

- In most situations, keep only a minimum amount of cash in savings or FD

http://www.starproperty.my/index.php/artic...oan-repayments/

Jagalat
post Aug 12 2014, 06:53 PM

(J)et L(ag) Ji(alat)
*******
Senior Member
5,949 posts

Joined: Oct 2013
QUOTE(CMW123 @ Aug 11 2014, 10:19 PM)
Any taikor know these statistics as it will provide some guide on the strength or weakness of different sized units vis-a-vis the others i.e. In terms of internal competition for subsale or rental upon VP?
*
Based-on the BlkE photos I have.
Total SA units (including L2) = 362
Total 596 sf studio (including L2) = 37
Total one room 8xx sf unit (including L2) = 194
Total SA with 2 rooms (including L2 + 9xx sf located at L2 to L3A) = 131

(Note: There are 3 units of 9xx sf located at L2 to L3A.
Not sure if thy have 1 or 2 rooms.
Due to their locations are right below the 2-roomers, they are classified as "2 rooms"
Feel free to make necessary adjustment if the 9xx sf are 1-roomer)

I give up on BlkH&J as my photo resolution are low.
Need other bosses for BlkH&J statistic....


Jagalat
post Aug 12 2014, 07:27 PM

(J)et L(ag) Ji(alat)
*******
Senior Member
5,949 posts

Joined: Oct 2013
Anyone has the inflation rate of KV for the past few years?
Pls share. Thank you...

QUOTE(Jagalat @ Aug 12 2014, 07:12 PM)
Weekday Sidetrack 1 - For those interested...

The effect of inflation on mortgage loan repayments

Points picked randomly from the article
- If loan interest rates > inflation
  Pay off your Loan

- If loan interest rates < inflation
  Use your money for either investments or consumption items

- In most situations, keep only a minimum amount of cash in savings or FD

http://www.starproperty.my/index.php/artic...oan-repayments/
*
CMW123
post Aug 13 2014, 12:48 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,774 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
Good read for condo investment from the STAR on 9 Aug 2014:

Poser on condo market

BY THEAN LEE CHENG



JOHN, 45, is considering buying a second condominium unit. He bought his first unit for about RM200,000 more than 10 years ago. He is considering upgrading to a bigger unit.

Other than location, he has concluded that the other factor to be considered would be the price point. It must not be a lot more than RM500,000.

Whether one is 30 or 50 years old, half-a-million ringgit seems to be the magic number among house buyers these days.

The problem is, RM500,000 will probably buy John and other like-minded folk a studio unit or a 400-square-feet Small Office, Home Office (SoHo) or variants of it.

John knows the property market is not as hot as before. In fact, he is hoping for prices to dip in order to pick up a choice unit.

The overall property market is consolidating. The pace and degree of increases in prices is certainly not as high as before. This consolidation in the property market has brought into focus a couple of issues besetting the market, specifically, the condominium sub-segment.

For a number of years now, property consultants have lamented the glut in condominium units in the country, particularly in the Klang Valley and subsequently in Johor.

That grouse continues unabated today. But other than shouting from the rooftops about a general glut and the current buyers’ market, property consultants are narrowing down to specifics bedeviling the condominium sector.

Possibly the most glaring of issues, says Raine & Horne executive director Lim Lian Hong, is the high number of units of 2,000 sq ft and above and the dearth of takers, be it buyers or tenants.

He says anything 2,000 sq ft and above is difficult to sell and rent. This is “particularly prevalent” in the Klang Valley.

Whether it is buying or renting, they are staying away from large units, as the bigger the built-up, the higher the price, he says.

“Two factors determine the market today – units with a built-up area of 1,000 sq ft or a ringgit value at the RM500,000 level. This situation has resulted in developers generally planning for their projects based on these two criteria,” says Lim.


“Up to RM700,000, we still think it is affordable. Anything above that is very difficult to sell and banks are finding it tougher to give loans. These are the determining factors today,” he says. Lim says he does not know how long this situation will prevail.

These two criteria upon which buyers base their purchases on is particularly glaring in locations in Mont’ Kiara and the Kuala Lumpur City Centre (KLCC).

The outcome is that buyers are buying into one-bedroom units of about 700 sq ft in Mont’ Kiara (with a monthly rental of between RM2,500 and RM3,500) and developers are building small units of less than 1,000 sq ft in the KLCC area for about RM1mil.

The point is, with an average monthly rental of RM3,000, a young Malaysian may as well buy his/her own unit. Which means, the owner of a one-bedder will be seeking a foreigner to rent the place.

Multiplying usage

Lim says developers are also discovering that their strategy of multiplying usage, which has seen the launch of mixed-use commercial units such as SoHos, SoFos, SoVos - essentially small offices, home offices - may not be as workable as initially thought.

“Developers thought that by multiplying usage – either for residential or office use – they could sell. But this has not been the case,” says Lim.

“They are finding out that they cannot mix the two,” he says.

He points out that this dual mix - as when one occupant uses it as an office and his neighbour uses it as a home - is not beneficial for the overall market.


Many of the issues in the high-rise residential market - mixed usage, prohibitive prices and lack of takers - have resulted in saturation in the market. This has invariably led to the current consolidation facing this residential segment, says PPC International managing director Siders Sittampalam.

“Greater KL is undergoing a broad base consolidation,” says Sittampalam, who is also the president of the Association of Valuers, Property Managers, Estate Agents and Property Consultants in the Private Sector.

He says the market saw a tremendous number of launches in 2011, “one too many for the market to absorb”.

The amount of funds in circulation, coupled with the ease of lending, resulted in “every subsequent launch being priced higher than the next”, a phenomenon not seen in the 1980s, Sittampalam says.

Prices went up in 2009/10 but had a very steep increase in 2011, with the overall market conditions facilitating multiple launches by developers.

Because the physical supply was not there then, that false sense of “smooth sailing” prevalent in the 2011/12 period may reverse this year and next, Sittampalam adds. Come this year and next, many of these units will be ready for occupation and will be placed on the rental market, he says. The time may come when a reality check is inevitable.

“Nobody questioned it then (in 2011) and the developers’ role was to sell,” he says.

In certain high-density areas, Sittampalam has seen a drop in pricing and rent since the middle of last year. The total volume of transactions has also contracted, he says.

In Mont’ Kiara, the more popular sizes are those with smaller built-up areas, with a pricing of about RM500 per sq ft, he says.

He says that location is characterised by a wide price range, variety in sizes and quality, with newer developments priced between RM800 and RM900 per sq ft and the older units about half that price.

“There is a huge discrepancy (there) because you are looking at entirely different levels of housing in terms of quality and amenities,” he says. Density issues have also given rise to congestion.

Rental per sq ft has also been on the decline from RM3.20 psf to RM2.80 psf or less in some developments in Mont’ Kiara. However, the positive side about Mont’ Kiara condominiums is that they offer amenities and security.

Sittampalam says a fully furnished three-bedroom 1,200 sq ft built-up unit in Mont’ Kiara may fetch a monthly rent of about RM3,600 compared with a double-storey house in Taman Tun Dr Ismail for RM3,500 and a Bangsar house for RM3,800.

Sittampalam and Lim’s comments differ markedly from Carey Properties managing director Nixon Paul, who is of the opinion that Mont’ Kiara prices are trending upwards after hitting a consolidation patch last year.

“Prices in Mont’ Kiara are moving up, especially for units with a built-up area of between 1,500 and 2,000 sq ft, the reason being that people are buying for their own occupation. Those who want to remain within close vicinity of Bangsar and Hartamas find landed housing too prohibitive because prices have risen dramatically, so a Mont’ Kiara condominium unit is an alternative,” says Paul.

A double-storey landed unit in the Hartamas area is priced at about RM1.8mil, while Mont’ Kiara landed units are priced from RM4mil upwards.

Both Sittampalam and Paul say it is not possible to compare the Mont’ Kiara condo market with that of KLCC’s, as the latter is a city centre location with prices being two to 2.5 times that of Mont’ Kiara’s.

“KLCC is predominantly an investors’ market and the foreigners’ focal point is the Petronas Twin Towers. There is oversupply there too,” says Paul.

He says there are several projects in Mont’ Kiara which only have units with built-up areas starting from about 3,000 sq ft. These condominium blocks are facing huge challenges. An MK11 unit, with a built-up of 3,317 sq ft, was advertised for a monthly rental of RM12,000. An MK10 unit, with a built-up of 3,668 sq ft, was put on sale for RM3.25mil. Such asking prices are proving to be rather prohibitive.

In its latest report, CBRE Malaysia’s 2014 first-quarter report says activities in the high-end secondary condominium market remain “moderate”.

The report says they continue to see “a slight increase in the average price” for secondary transactions in KLCC, Bangsar and Mont’ Kiara (up 0.97% quarter-on-quarter to RM826 psf). Price movements during the period were most significant in Mont’ Kiara, followed by KLCC and Bangsar. Capital values in Mont’ Kiara and Bangsar have climbed by 14% and 15.63%, respectively, since the beginning of 2011. This suggests that investors continue to view opportunities in the secondary market of these prime markets compared with rising prices in the primary market.

However, the rental market remains a concern, the report says.

C H Williams Talhar & Wong’s Property Market 2014 says the supply of luxury condominiums had been rising at an average of 20% per year from 2008 to the end of 2013, representing one of the fastest-growing property segments in the period.

In 2008, there were 10,674 units in prime areas in the Klang Valley. This rose to 26,816 units by the end of 2013, an increase of 151%.

C H Williams says looking forward, the total supply will rise rapidly this year to 32,020 units, with the majority of them concentrated in KLCC, Mont’ Kiara, Ampang Hilir/U-Thant and Bangsar.

Vacancy also rose from 26% in 2008 to 35% in 2012. With the increase in the net take-up in 2013, the vacancy rate fell to 32% in 2013.
CMW123
post Aug 13 2014, 12:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,774 posts

Joined: Mar 2012
QUOTE(pepper99 @ Aug 12 2014, 09:15 AM)
technically bigger unit will fetch higher rental.. but not all tenants can afford bigger unit n hence higher rental.. so smaller units will fetch better rental in terms of size.. for example.. my fren renting a unit in TCM for rm2.6k fully furnished around 600 sqft.. i think bro CMW123 is trying to imply this??
*
What I meant was not total rental ma...but rental rate psf

For eg:

1,300 sf rental is RM3,600 so rental psf is RM2.76
1,000 sf rental is RM2,900 so rental psf is RM2.90
800 sf rental is RM2,500 so rental psf is RM3.12

So small units will have higher rental rate psf vs bigger unit

QSquare
post Aug 13 2014, 01:19 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
48 posts

Joined: Jul 2014
QUOTE(CMW123 @ Aug 13 2014, 12:48 PM)
Good read for condo investment from the STAR on 9 Aug 2014:

Poser on condo market

BY THEAN LEE CHENG
JOHN, 45, is considering buying a second condominium unit. He bought his first unit for about RM200,000 more than 10 years ago. He is considering upgrading to a bigger unit.

Other than location, he has concluded that the other factor to be considered would be the price point. It must not be a lot more than RM500,000.

Whether one is 30 or 50 years old, half-a-million ringgit seems to be the magic number among house buyers these days.

The problem is, RM500,000 will probably buy John and other like-minded folk a studio unit or a 400-square-feet Small Office, Home Office (SoHo) or variants of it.

John knows the property market is not as hot as before. In fact, he is hoping for prices to dip in order to pick up a choice unit.

The overall property market is consolidating. The pace and degree of increases in prices is certainly not as high as before. This consolidation in the property market has brought into focus a couple of issues besetting the market, specifically, the condominium sub-segment.

For a number of years now, property consultants have lamented the glut in condominium units in the country, particularly in the Klang Valley and subsequently in Johor.

That grouse continues unabated today. But other than shouting from the rooftops about a general glut and the current buyers’ market, property consultants are narrowing down to specifics bedeviling the condominium sector.

Possibly the most glaring of issues, says Raine & Horne executive director Lim Lian Hong, is the high number of units of 2,000 sq ft and above and the dearth of takers, be it buyers or tenants.

He says anything 2,000 sq ft and above is difficult to sell and rent. This is “particularly prevalent” in the Klang Valley.

Whether it is buying or renting, they are staying away from large units, as the bigger the built-up, the higher the price, he says.

“Two factors determine the market today – units with a built-up area of 1,000 sq ft or a ringgit value at the RM500,000 level. This situation has resulted in developers generally planning for their projects based on these two criteria,” says Lim.
“Up to RM700,000, we still think it is affordable. Anything above that is very difficult to sell and banks are finding it tougher to give loans. These are the determining factors today,” he says. Lim says he does not know how long this situation will prevail.

These two criteria upon which buyers base their purchases on is particularly glaring in locations in Mont’ Kiara and the Kuala Lumpur City Centre (KLCC).

The outcome is that buyers are buying into one-bedroom units of about 700 sq ft in Mont’ Kiara (with a monthly rental of between RM2,500 and RM3,500) and developers are building small units of less than 1,000 sq ft in the KLCC area for about RM1mil.

The point is, with an average monthly rental of RM3,000, a young Malaysian may as well buy his/her own unit. Which means, the owner of a one-bedder will be seeking a foreigner to rent the place.

Multiplying usage

Lim says developers are also discovering that their strategy of multiplying usage, which has seen the launch of mixed-use commercial units such as SoHos, SoFos, SoVos - essentially small offices, home offices - may not be as workable as initially thought.

“Developers thought that by multiplying usage – either for residential or office use – they could sell. But this has not been the case,” says Lim.

“They are finding out that they cannot mix the two,” he says.

He points out that this dual mix - as when one occupant uses it as an office and his neighbour uses it as a home - is not beneficial for the overall market.


Many of the issues in the high-rise residential market - mixed usage, prohibitive prices and lack of takers - have resulted in saturation in the market. This has invariably led to the current consolidation facing this residential segment, says PPC International managing director Siders Sittampalam.

“Greater KL is undergoing a broad base consolidation,” says Sittampalam, who is also the president of the Association of Valuers, Property Managers, Estate Agents and Property Consultants in the Private Sector.

He says the market saw a tremendous number of launches in 2011, “one too many for the market to absorb”.

The amount of funds in circulation, coupled with the ease of lending, resulted in “every subsequent launch being priced higher than the next”, a phenomenon not seen in the 1980s, Sittampalam says.

Prices went up in 2009/10 but had a very steep increase in 2011, with the overall market conditions facilitating multiple launches by developers.

Because the physical supply was not there then, that false sense of “smooth sailing” prevalent in the 2011/12 period may reverse this year and next, Sittampalam adds. Come this year and next, many of these units will be ready for occupation and will be placed on the rental market, he says. The time may come when a reality check is inevitable.

“Nobody questioned it then (in 2011) and the developers’ role was to sell,” he says.

In certain high-density areas, Sittampalam has seen a drop in pricing and rent since the middle of last year. The total volume of transactions has also contracted, he says.

In Mont’ Kiara, the more popular sizes are those with smaller built-up areas, with a pricing of about RM500 per sq ft, he says.

He says that location is characterised by a wide price range, variety in sizes and quality, with newer developments priced between RM800 and RM900 per sq ft and the older units about half that price.

“There is a huge discrepancy (there) because you are looking at entirely different levels of housing in terms of quality and amenities,” he says. Density issues have also given rise to congestion.

Rental per sq ft has also been on the decline from RM3.20 psf to RM2.80 psf or less in some developments in Mont’ Kiara. However, the positive side about Mont’ Kiara condominiums is that they offer amenities and security.

Sittampalam says a fully furnished three-bedroom 1,200 sq ft built-up unit in Mont’ Kiara may fetch a monthly rent of about RM3,600 compared with a double-storey house in Taman Tun Dr Ismail for RM3,500 and a Bangsar house for RM3,800.

Sittampalam and Lim’s comments differ markedly from Carey Properties managing director Nixon Paul, who is of the opinion that Mont’ Kiara prices are trending upwards after hitting a consolidation patch last year.

“Prices in Mont’ Kiara are moving up, especially for units with a built-up area of between 1,500 and 2,000 sq ft, the reason being that people are buying for their own occupation. Those who want to remain within close vicinity of Bangsar and Hartamas find landed housing too prohibitive because prices have risen dramatically, so a Mont’ Kiara condominium unit is an alternative,” says Paul.

A double-storey landed unit in the Hartamas area is priced at about RM1.8mil, while Mont’ Kiara landed units are priced from RM4mil upwards.

Both Sittampalam and Paul say it is not possible to compare the Mont’ Kiara condo market with that of KLCC’s, as the latter is a city centre location with prices being two to 2.5 times that of Mont’ Kiara’s.

“KLCC is predominantly an investors’ market and the foreigners’ focal point is the Petronas Twin Towers. There is oversupply there too,” says Paul.

He says there are several projects in Mont’ Kiara which only have units with built-up areas starting from about 3,000 sq ft. These condominium blocks are facing huge challenges. An MK11 unit, with a built-up of 3,317 sq ft, was advertised for a monthly rental of RM12,000. An MK10 unit, with a built-up of 3,668 sq ft, was put on sale for RM3.25mil. Such asking prices are proving to be rather prohibitive.

In its latest report, CBRE Malaysia’s 2014 first-quarter report says activities in the high-end secondary condominium market remain “moderate”.

The report says they continue to see “a slight increase in the average price” for secondary transactions in KLCC, Bangsar and Mont’ Kiara (up 0.97% quarter-on-quarter to RM826 psf). Price movements during the period were most significant in Mont’ Kiara, followed by KLCC and Bangsar. Capital values in Mont’ Kiara and Bangsar have climbed by 14% and 15.63%, respectively, since the beginning of 2011. This suggests that investors continue to view opportunities in the secondary market of these prime markets compared with rising prices in the primary market.

However, the rental market remains a concern, the report says.

C H Williams Talhar & Wong’s Property Market 2014 says the supply of luxury condominiums had been rising at an average of 20% per year from 2008 to the end of 2013, representing one of the fastest-growing property segments in the period.

In 2008, there were 10,674 units in prime areas in the Klang Valley. This rose to 26,816 units by the end of 2013, an increase of 151%.

C H Williams says looking forward, the total supply will rise rapidly this year to 32,020 units, with the majority of them concentrated in KLCC, Mont’ Kiara, Ampang Hilir/U-Thant and Bangsar.

Vacancy also rose from 26% in 2008 to 35% in 2012. With the increase in the net take-up in 2013, the vacancy rate fell to 32% in 2013.
*
Good that you posted this news here. I saw the same new being posted in one of the most well known property group in facebook. And you can guess its reception, no one focking care because it is one sensitive issue

110 Pages « < 46 47 48 49 50 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0252sec    0.38    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 06:27 PM