NO

With All these new transfers, we don't need the wold ones except Stevie for obvious reasons.

The sale of Suarez alone paid for this team

YOU talking!

Totally agree.

Plus we have MORE games now which includes CL.

If anyone think Suarez or Sturridge can play 60 games after the world cup to come, they gotta have their brains examined.

In addition,Lambert's style gives another option. Headers and hold up play which in what i have seen is pretty good.
And of course the assist stats which you have pointed out.
He will add another dimension on the cheap.
At 33, BR would have seen the value he brings since he breaks the age rule.

Cant afford to bring in another 30m plus striker to be on the bench when we already have TWO!

i agree

His stats Goals 14 Assists 11

not bad as 3rd striker

Englang International for 4 mil aint bad

This post has been edited by prophetjul: May 31 2014, 10:48 AM

More risk with Shaw IMO. For an 18 year old? Hmmmmmm

Southampton value Shaw at £30m, with United having previously made a bid of £27m, while offering him around £100,000 a week. Chelsea, one of a clutch of clubs that also want the left-back, are resistant to meeting the £30m price and, it is understood, would propose paying a weekly wage in the region of £60,000.

Perhaps the most obvious value Lambert would bring to the squad is his ability to offer Rodgers a different option. Without wishing to be overly critical of Iago Aspas, Rickie Lambert would have made far more of a difference in the game at Anfield against Chelsea towards the end of the season, giving the team a different way to try and get around that parked bus. Liverpool can expect many more parked buses next season as other sides look to emulate an approach that proved successful in muting the attacking power of the Reds.

Lambert is far more of a threat in the air than any of Liverpool’s current forwards and can hold the ball up well but Brendan Rodgers wouldn’t sign a player for those qualities alone – just ask Andy Carroll. Lambert is quick-footed, skilful and is one of those players who can both see and execute the kind of passes that lead to chances. He’ll also come in handy for any penalties if Steven Gerrard happens to be sitting a game out.

There will be times when Gerrard does sit games out next season, especially when the games are coming thick and fast, and Lambert’s experience is something that Rodgers will value highly. For all that the Reds boss likes to give youth a chance he recognises the importance of having some older heads around to lead and guide them and Lambert will certainly offer him that.

Lambert is quite clearly one of many signings the Reds need to make this summer if they are to challenge on all fronts next season. The shopping list is long and Rodgers will need to budget wisely if he wants to cross all the items off.

At £4m, the question shouldn’t be: “Why Rickie Lambert?” The question should be: “Why not?”



http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/new...6#ixzz33G3XOMBx
Follow us: @DailyMirror on Twitter | DailyMirror on Facebook


Think the writer forgot. Lambert takes a pretty mean free kick as well

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_quer...bert+free+kicks

If Southampton is dragging its ransom, its Markovic possibility

http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/48...er-Adam-Lallana

CBs- we have abundance.
Unless someone leaves.
Skrtel, Agger, Sakho, Toure, Coates, Ilori

Because we already have enough strikers?

Sturridge lacks WC experience as well. But he is a top class striker

First of all you are assuming Borini will be shipped.

Next, you assume Lambert is plan B. Bear in mind, Lambert is plan A for Engerlund.
Maybe Rogers thinks different. Maybe Suarez, Sturr and Lamb are all plan A depending on opponents?

Manzukic may not be that cheap. His wages may also be not so cheap.

BUT i do agree that if those guys are shipped, dont mind having him in the 4 strikers dept.
Really i prefer Sanchez from Barca.
We all have our wishes.

Oil Doallahs 1 Fairplay -1

Don't believe Everything you read.

Anyone saw the Brazil vs Coatia game?

Was watching Lovren a bit....not really impressed.
Quite weak actually compared with Skrtel.
The 2nd goal went through him. Skrt would most probably have dealt with the shot.
Certainly not an improvement on Agger.

What do ya think?

sori

typo.....1st goal and 3rd goal

1st goal went through him without a challenge

3rd goal no convicted challenge at Oscar

Skrt would have thrown himself at the challenge

o My....just realised Cameroon keeper is on our books!

Itanje

was that him?

yes...........

Hit across the ball with yer last three small toes

Aye

THIS Juninho is deadly with freekicks!

15m will buy Muller's left toe...........