Well it can also be because of the camera. Some limits la, like noise and whatnot. I shoot night photogs with my 400d happily with ISO800-1600, no flash. Couldn't be done with the S3.

But yeah I agree. At least half, if not more, of a picture comes from the person using the camera.

Wooo looks like I've justified my purchase, since I like to shoot in low light conditions without flash.
Most def can't be done with this cam.

But yeah I agree generally with kelvin. Those shots, though i'm sure are post-processed, show what you can do with an S3, and in those conditions, you can't say the camera limits you.

And a wee bit blur. Maybe a little sharpening can fix that. This handheld?

Oooh then it's not too bad. IS really helps eh? Gosh I miss IS with my new cam. Bahhhh

Ehhh I need worrr. Cos my tangan keding, so benda berat can shake one. Hahaha.
My next lens will have IS, though I kena starve myself for quite a while. lol

Yep Shashinki is safe. Bought my million dollar home and underwater case from them. Very fast service too.

Edit: Comment - The picture looks a little too saturated, and it could be sharper. What mode and settings were you using? And maybe you could compose the picture better by moving the flower to be higher up and to the right of the picture.

Lol that's what I think anyways.



This post has been edited by tulerst: Sep 2 2007, 04:29 PM

Hahaha. Panning.. Loads of trial and error. But great fun!

@ Keii-Kun : Yeah that is a little better. But try a different picture now. This looks a little too processed.

Post processing is almost inevitable, even when you don't realize it.
The JPEGs that come out from your camera area already processed. Sharpened, Saturated, blah blah blah.
Just that when you do more processing, try to not take it too far.



And I think you're right there.

30 bux. Hahahah.

Woolala! Macam best jer. I'm def getting this. Been eyeing it for a pretty darn long time. Wonder how it works with my setup lol.

No not kit lens. Plan to use it with my 70-200. Play with butterflies and stuff.

This post has been edited by tulerst: Sep 15 2007, 05:40 AM

Panning with a macro filter? hmm? haha. Might be interesting.

Edit: The more i see the pics above, the more I can't wait to get the raynox. Gah! Stim giler!

This post has been edited by tulerst: Sep 15 2007, 10:52 PM

It should. Uses the threads on the end of the lens to clip on, so it's pretty universal. IIRC it's 52-67mm thread.

Me thinks he means decrease.

Yep. Charge mine with my Energizer charger. But be prepared to spend quite a bit on the batts. Realised I spend 70 Bux for 4 pieces. Hahaha. But it was worthwhile.

Oh? Damn means my RM135 Energizer batts bought from a pretty reputable store is fake. Damn.

Yeah he kena racun. Hahaha

This post has been edited by tulerst: Oct 13 2007, 06:58 PM